cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
really?
go cry on your mom's shoulder and tell her all about it. i'm sure she'll come over here and let me have it...
oh wait, it's my turn to go to her place... fuck...
Is the World Flat? The Flatlander's theory..
- Thread starter ODanksta
- Start date
- Status
go cry on your mom's shoulder and tell her all about it. i'm sure she'll come over here and let me have it...
oh wait, it's my turn to go to her place... fuck...
Padawanbater2
Well-Known Member
56 feet, not 3,433 feet
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
obloquy is not the same as slander. get a dictionary; most libraries give them out for free to pitiful, not-quite-educated dunces like yourself...
tangerinegreen555
Well-Known Member
It's all you got. You have zero facts. Zero.
As a matter of fact, that's your new name.
Zero. How's your Jewish boy friend treating you Zero?
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
he can't answer right now, he's busy being spanked and dominated atm...
Mellowman2112
Well-Known Member
Here is a handy dandy gizmo that will do the math for ya
https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=30&h0=10&unit=imperial
a senile fungus
Well-Known Member
forewarning. this is a long post but i was asked earlier to prove a curved earth. there will be paragraphs. and video proofs.
BULLSHIT.
the height of the south stack lighthouse is 92 feet on its own. it has a focal height of 200feet above the surface of the water. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Stack_Lighthouse
i'd venture to say that the photo that you posted is yet another 100ft at least above the top of the lighthouse, so now we are looking over the horizon with an eye height (H0) of about 300ft. now, we check out the map of the area in question, https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3045401,-4.7018803,15z/data=!5m1!1e4 and we can conclude that the photo was probably taken from tower ellin. Draw a straight line from tower ellin, through where the the south stack lighthouse is, and that line actually continues onto cross the path of the patch of higher elevation that is 10-20miles to the northeast of dundalk. check the map, draw the lines. i did.
using the earth curve calculator at https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=80&h0=300&unit=imperial one can determine that with an eye height (H0) of 300ft above the surface of the earth that the distance to the horizon would be 21.21 miles and that any object with a height of less than 2304ft will be obscured by the horizon when viewed from a distance of 80miles.
now we check elevations, specifically focusing on the area 10-20miles to the Northeast of dundalk. http://en-ie.topographic-map.com/places/Dundalk-6431/ the patch of higher elevation that is 10-20miles to the northeast of dundalk has elevations of over 2000 meters, or over 6000 feet. so, from 300ft above the surface of the water, looking with a powerful telephoto lens over the horizon of the curved earth, a view of a patch of terrain 10-20miles northeast of dundalk with elevations of over 6000ft is totally possible. in fact, you've posted a picture of it for all of us to see! no photoshop, lol
oh yeah, and remember that push/pull video i showed you of the cool trick where you can push and pull the background of a shot by using a telephoto lens?
well obviously the person taking the photo is in possession of a powerful telephoto lens capable of miles and miles of zoom. that would sufficiently explain why the landmass in the background seems to fill the width of the photo.
i could do the math and show my work, but i'm not going to waste any more of my own time lol. and yes it is the distance squared times the 8inches per mile, but that only works for short distances, longer distances and you have to start working with sin and cos and thinking in radians. i can help you with the maths for a fee, get in touch with me for tutoring services.
so , using the shorthand method, about 80miles, squared, times the approx 8inches per mile, divided by 12inches in a foot, equals out to around 4,267ft, assuming the path of travel is directly upon the surface of the earth. things change when you take into account the height of the observer, as evidenced by the video that @Padawanbater2 posted of the two sunsets from the same spot, just different heights and lines of sight. plugging those numbers into the earth curve calculator gives me a target hidden height of 4267ft, assuming an eye height of 0ft (your head is laying on the ground and you're looking sideways over the curvature of the earth before you).
lol by the end of that rant i smoked myself stupid but i'm pretty sure i've made my point already.
OHHHH and i'm nearly at 10,000 likes with under 5000 posts, but i'm cutting it realllllll close. I'd like to get there, it'd mean a lot to me @mr sunshine love you boo
maybe some loving, or liking, people could help me out with this predicament?
much appreciated!
BULLSHIT.
the height of the south stack lighthouse is 92 feet on its own. it has a focal height of 200feet above the surface of the water. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Stack_Lighthouse
i'd venture to say that the photo that you posted is yet another 100ft at least above the top of the lighthouse, so now we are looking over the horizon with an eye height (H0) of about 300ft. now, we check out the map of the area in question, https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3045401,-4.7018803,15z/data=!5m1!1e4 and we can conclude that the photo was probably taken from tower ellin. Draw a straight line from tower ellin, through where the the south stack lighthouse is, and that line actually continues onto cross the path of the patch of higher elevation that is 10-20miles to the northeast of dundalk. check the map, draw the lines. i did.
using the earth curve calculator at https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=80&h0=300&unit=imperial one can determine that with an eye height (H0) of 300ft above the surface of the earth that the distance to the horizon would be 21.21 miles and that any object with a height of less than 2304ft will be obscured by the horizon when viewed from a distance of 80miles.
now we check elevations, specifically focusing on the area 10-20miles to the Northeast of dundalk. http://en-ie.topographic-map.com/places/Dundalk-6431/ the patch of higher elevation that is 10-20miles to the northeast of dundalk has elevations of over 2000 meters, or over 6000 feet. so, from 300ft above the surface of the water, looking with a powerful telephoto lens over the horizon of the curved earth, a view of a patch of terrain 10-20miles northeast of dundalk with elevations of over 6000ft is totally possible. in fact, you've posted a picture of it for all of us to see! no photoshop, lol
oh yeah, and remember that push/pull video i showed you of the cool trick where you can push and pull the background of a shot by using a telephoto lens?
well obviously the person taking the photo is in possession of a powerful telephoto lens capable of miles and miles of zoom. that would sufficiently explain why the landmass in the background seems to fill the width of the photo.
i could do the math and show my work, but i'm not going to waste any more of my own time lol. and yes it is the distance squared times the 8inches per mile, but that only works for short distances, longer distances and you have to start working with sin and cos and thinking in radians. i can help you with the maths for a fee, get in touch with me for tutoring services.
so , using the shorthand method, about 80miles, squared, times the approx 8inches per mile, divided by 12inches in a foot, equals out to around 4,267ft, assuming the path of travel is directly upon the surface of the earth. things change when you take into account the height of the observer, as evidenced by the video that @Padawanbater2 posted of the two sunsets from the same spot, just different heights and lines of sight. plugging those numbers into the earth curve calculator gives me a target hidden height of 4267ft, assuming an eye height of 0ft (your head is laying on the ground and you're looking sideways over the curvature of the earth before you).
lol by the end of that rant i smoked myself stupid but i'm pretty sure i've made my point already.
OHHHH and i'm nearly at 10,000 likes with under 5000 posts, but i'm cutting it realllllll close. I'd like to get there, it'd mean a lot to me @mr sunshine love you boo
maybe some loving, or liking, people could help me out with this predicament?
much appreciated!
zeddd
Well-Known Member
Fuk off stupid
SunnyJim
Well-Known Member
This clown gets his information from watching Oliver Stone films. So funny.
Mellowman be like "But Kevin Costner is a real lawyer. I should know - we went to 'pretend' law school together and I would fellate him after class."
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
This has got to be the most ironically hilarious post in the entire thread. You, a xian, are poking fun at scientific theory, likening it to 'magic'. Talking snakes, zombie messiahs, demons, angels, and a plethora of other childish B movie mythology. An omnipotent deity with no origin snaps his fingers to create the complexity of the cosmos AND an afterlife, and WE believe in magic? Even you have to see how delicious that is. Also, it's evident that you don't understand BB theory at all, no where does it state that everything came from nothing. Prattle on, doofus. You're such a joke...
tyler.durden
Well-Known Member
zeddd
Well-Known Member
And I will come back from the dead in a few days, sounds legit
Drowning-Man
Well-Known Member
Praise the Lord, I think this tread is finally dead.
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
not anymore... lol
claypipe69
Well-Known Member
My pet rat ate all my garlic again
He told me it keeps him young an keeps his fur shiny an he can see better in the dark
He reckons the mushrooms are ready he ate them to 
now who`s a naughty rat 
He told me it keeps him young an keeps his fur shiny an he can see better in the dark He reckons the mushrooms are ready he ate them to now who`s a naughty rat
cat of curiosity
Well-Known Member
@DavidKratos92 ?My pet rat ate all my garlic again
- Status
