Jail Gets a Bad Rap

pabloesqobar said:

And all the folks in the thread you posted here disagree with your use of the Hindu religion and your defense in general:

http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139006

Click to expand...

And that's funny that you bring that up as an example, that is the exact case I won in Texas. So your example of my 'legal theory' being torn apart by lawyer trolls, is an example of it also working perfectly in court.

Finshaggy said:

Here are the actual words of the Religious Laws in America, because you seem confused about what is protected and what is not.

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–5 - Definitions
(7) Religious exercise
(A) In general
The term “religious exercise” includes any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.

42 U.S. Code § 2000cc–3 - Rules of construction
(g) Broad construction
This chapter shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter and the Constitution.

42 U.S. Code § 2000bb - Congressional findings and declaration of purposes
494 U.S. 872 (1990) the Supreme Court virtually eliminated the requirement that the government justify burdens on religious exercise imposed by laws neutral toward religion; and
374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972) and to guarantee its application in all cases where free exercise of religion is substantially burdened; and
(2)
to provide a claim or defense to persons whose religious exercise is substantially burdened by government.

42 U.S. Code § 2000bb–3 - Applicability
(a) In general
This chapter applies to all Federal law, and the implementation of that law, whether statutory or otherwise, and whether adopted before or after November 16, 1993.
(b) Rule of construction
Federal statutory law adopted after November 16, 1993, is subject to this chapter unless such law explicitly excludes such application by reference to this chapter.
(c) Religious belief unaffected
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize any government to burden any religious belief.

Click to expand...

pabloesqobar said:

Those weren't members from this forum. What was it about their assertions that was wrong? They seemed much more knowledgeable about Hinduism than you.

Click to expand...

Then why are people from this forum posting it 5 years later?

Another example is the Joe Rogan forums. They are all complete trolls, literally dick measuring.

Finshaggy said:

And that's funny that you bring that up as an example, that is the exact case I won in Texas. So your example of my 'legal theory' being torn apart by lawyer trolls, is an example of it also working perfectly in court.

Click to expand...

You pleaded guilty and were convicted and sentenced to probation. That was never reversed on appeal, correct? If it never went to trial, no jury ever heard your religious defense.

pabloesqobar said:

You pleaded guilty and were convicted and sentenced to probation. That was never reversed on appeal, correct? If it never went to trial, no jury ever heard your religious defense.

Click to expand...

Again, it was deferred adjudication, not a conviction and probation. If you do not know how deferred adjudication works, it is where the judge (the adjudicator) deferres (hence the word deferred) the judgment (the adjudication) to a Probation Officer, to usually be settled at the end of Probation with no Conviction, or it gets Revoked and goes to court.

They revoked my Probation and the case was dismissed when we went to court for it.

Also, my Public Defender was Kerrie Walker, and she was part of a DUI scandal where she was helping an xFBI agent win a case for his client because she wanted to go into the FBI. She has since let her law license run out and has stopped practicing law. So I had inadequate representation of counsel, and conflict of interest in my case. It needed to be reheard anyway.

srh88 said:

ive been practicing and everything, i only eat fossils and leaves now

Click to expand...

Do you juice bro?

6ohMax said:

I'm speaking to everyone in general, but telling fin to chill with the copy paste stuff

Also saying I know I'm not very savory around here, but hey...I like it here.

Click to expand...

I'd add a bit more salt, rosemary, and a healthy shot of garlic

pabloesqobar said:

Ok, so I tried to find it like you asked. Damn, you are all over the internet. But you did plead guilty, meaning you were convicted and sentenced to probation. Your religious defense never came into play.

View attachment 3673594

According to you, you pleaded guilty. By definition, you were convicted. And placed on probation.

Click to expand...

As I said.

A deferment is a guilty plea. It should be off his record after completion of probation.

The justice system will always know about it.

A deferment is for first time offenders. Mainly, guts what?

Non violent drug charges. Sound familiar? Lol.

If fin gets in trouble again he will be in more trouble. They won't give him another deferment.

Singlemalt said:

I'd add a bit more salt, rosemary, and a healthy shot of garlic

Click to expand...

Sweet n savory?

Ok ok finshaggy you win! Jail is the fuxking shit! You learn so much! You always got a hommie to WASH you're back! The food is great! And the salt peter in the water is the icing on the cake!

You can bet, pablo gets a mini erection when he researches other forum members.

And that is one Paragraph. I Submitted 144 pages of that to the court before they dismissed the case.

And in my current lawsuit the PD's arugment is that they are part of the City and therefore out of Jurisdiction and Immune.

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CP/htm/CP.110.htm
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
TITLE 5. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY
CHAPTER 110. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
(2) "Government agency" means:
(A) this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state; and
(B) any agency of this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state, including a department, bureau, board, commission, office, agency, council, or public institution of higher education.

pabloesqobar said:

And all the folks in the thread you posted here disagree with your use of the Hindu religion and your defense in general:

http://www.expertlaw.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139006

Click to expand...

A direct quote.

"I even yelled it as I was brought into detention centers, and spoke to people about it for months as I was imprisoned. They made talking about religion against the rules in my pod because of me. They'll remember."


Sounds like people got tired of him and made it again st the rules to keep fin from getting hurt.

abe supercro said:

You can bet, pablo gets a mini erection when he researches other forum members.

Click to expand...

He asked me to research it you dimwit. I see you're still angry about me not liking that silly Trump meme.

According to you, you were gonna "troll me indefinitely ", correct? Is this where it starts? Please let me know when I'm supposed to be magically upset because of what you type into your computer.

Finshaggy said:

And that's funny that you bring that up as an example, that is the exact case I won in Texas. So your example of my 'legal theory' being torn apart by lawyer trolls, is an example of it also working perfectly in court.

Click to expand...

Dude, get a grip on reality. You pled guilty and it was deferred.

You were a first time offender. Thats how a deferment works.

You pled guilty. Just because you finished probation and they sealed doesn't mean you won.

You were lucky and it won't happen again. You get arrested there again for pot, you will be charged and will get a charge out of it.

Corruption in Collin County/Texas Government
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2015/09/ken-paxton-hires-terri-moore-dan-cogdell-to-lead-defense-team.html/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/public_corruption
http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/docs/PE/htm/PE.39.htm

Rick Perry
Kirk Watson
Mary Ann Wiley
David L Botsford

Ken Paxton
Eldorado-Collin L.P.
Cornerstone Development
Chicago Title Insurance Co.
Collin County Appraisal District
Unity Resources LLC
WatchGuard Video
Enforcement Video LP
Greg Willis
Don Day
Byron Cook
Anthony Holm
Dan Cogdell
Terri Moore
Ted Cruz
Dan Patrick
Howard Hamilton
Judge Willis
Servergy Inc.
William Mapp
Joel Hochberg

Jason Gray
Jason Cooley
Ty Lake
Joe Williams
Todd Philips
Cheree Bontrager
Geralyn Kever

John Roach
Judge Sandoval
Judge Roach Jr.
Patricia Wysong Crigger
Hannah Kunkle
Rebecca Littrell
Sherry Bell

Kerrie Walker
Curtis Howard

Dwayne Henderson

Rick Perry threatened to, and did because if personal disputes with other officials, use his office to veto otherwise passable bills and coerced an official into resignation.

Ken Paxton & Byron Cook voted for spending bills that gave state business WatchGuard video which they own stock in. Byron Cook is on the board of WatchGuard and Ken Paxton helped form the company and loaned it money. WatchGuard was contracted to provide cameras to McKinney Police.

El Dorado-Collin, a company Ken Paxton and Greg Willis are partners in, bought land from North Dallas Loan and Trust, then lobbied to rezone it. Days after rezoning it sold the land to Cornerstone development who used a company Ken Paxton has interest in called Chicago Title Insurance Co., cornerstone then sold the land to Mckinney's appraisal district, who Paxton was aware the whole time wanted to buy the land.

1 Grand Jury in Collin county has:
5 members from one church, the pastor is the Foreman, 2 associate pastors are jurors and 2 more church members are on the same jury. One juror hosted a fund raiser for Greg Willis in her home and donated to Ken Paxton's campaign, one supported Greg Willis' campaign. 2 have served on the executive committee of the Collin county Republican Party.

2nd Grand Jury in Collin county:
The foreman and vice foreman were actively involved in Ken Paxton's campaign.

http://www.leagle.com/decision/19801200446US754_11169/HANRAHAN%20v.%20HAMPTON

whitebb2727 said:

Dude, get a grip on reality. You pled guilty and it was deferred.

You were a first time offender. Thats how a deferment works.

You pled guilty. Just because you finished probation and they sealed doesn't mean you won.

Yoh were lucky and it won't happen again. You get arrested there again for pot, you will be charged and will get a charge out of it.

Click to expand...

I won the case. I have 0 convictions on my record for anything. So I really don't care what your opinion is.

And I won the case by pleading not guilty to all claimed probation violations and asserting my Religion as a defense. So deal with it.

Ever had a real motivated blow job Fin?