Jail Gets a Bad Rap

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And the Church of Neuroscience has already been to the 5th Circuit court of appeals. So I told them (the detective) to issue a warrant if they really feel like it so we can settle this in court. And say they issued a county warrant, and for some reason the county convicted me. I would appeal to the Federal District Court, say I lose there too. Next is the 5th Circuit Court of appeals and the Church of Neuroscience has already won there, so we just have to show them the case we won and they will rule in our favor.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And again nothing I had was illegal, so not only would they lose, they would have to file false charges. Unless they just want to give me a paraphernalia ticket, that is all they can do. And I'll fight that too.
 

pabloesqobar

Well-Known Member
Why didn't you demand a jury trial?

I see your Judge is a well respected Obama appointee. And was the 1st openly gay judge in the entire 5th circuit.

Maybe he smokes weed.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Why didn't you demand a jury trial?

I see your Judge is a well respected Obama appointee. And was the 1st openly gay judge in the entire 5th circuit.

Maybe he smokes weed.
No charges were filed. I am the Plaintiff, they are the Defendants. And now that my property is being released the lawsuit is the only thing left, there is no longer an investigation. But they will have to justify the 4 months they kept my stuff in the lab for, or I am guaranteed to win the lawsuit even at the lowest court.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And they can't justify it, I am just saying that is their only hope. I talked to the PD and the Property room this whole time and they have been telling me it should have been released after like 2 weeks. So they have 18 weeks to account for.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And the 5th Circuit case wasn't me, it was Dr. Jeremy Kerr and the DEA, but it is pretty much the exact same situation as me and the City, and is literally the same Church.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
We just aren't allowed to call them cures if we sell them (according to the FDA), that would make them Drugs under the law. But currently they are Religious Sacraments, not Drugs. We use them for our Religion, not as a cure.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE


TITLE 5. GOVERNMENTAL LIABILITY


CHAPTER 110. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM



Sec. 110.001. DEFINITIONS. (a) In this chapter:

(1) "Free exercise of religion" means an act or refusal to act that is substantially motivated by sincere religious belief. In determining whether an act or refusal to act is substantially motivated by sincere religious belief under this chapter, it is not necessary to determine that the act or refusal to act is motivated by a central part or central requirement of the person's sincere religious belief.

(2) "Government agency" means:

(A) this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state; and

(B) any agency of this state or a municipality or other political subdivision of this state, including a department, bureau, board, commission, office, agency, council, or public institution of higher education.

(b) In determining whether an interest is a compelling governmental interest under Section 110.003, a court shall give weight to the interpretation of compelling interest in federal case law relating to the free exercise of religion clause of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.




Sec. 110.002. APPLICATION. (a) This chapter applies to any ordinance, rule, order, decision, practice, or other exercise of governmental authority.

(b) This chapter applies to an act of a government agency, in the exercise of governmental authority, granting or refusing to grant a government benefit to an individual.

(c) This chapter applies to each law of this state unless the law is expressly made exempt from the application of this chapter by reference to this chapter.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.




Sec. 110.003. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM PROTECTED. (a) Subject to Subsection (b), a government agency may not substantially burden a person's free exercise of religion.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply if the government agency demonstrates that the application of the burden to the person:

(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and

(2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.

(c) A government agency that makes the demonstration required by Subsection (b) is not required to separately prove that the remedy and penalty provisions of the law, ordinance, rule, order, decision, practice, or other exercise of governmental authority that imposes the substantial burden are the least restrictive means to ensure compliance or to punish the failure to comply.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.



110.003 may assert that violation as a defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding without regard to whether the proceeding is brought in the name of the state or by any other person.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.




Sec. 110.005. REMEDIES. (a) Any person, other than a government agency, who successfully asserts a claim or defense under this chapter is entitled to recover:

(1) declaratory relief under Chapter 37;

(2) injunctive relief to prevent the threatened violation or continued violation;

(3) compensatory damages for pecuniary and nonpecuniary losses; and

(4) reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and other reasonable expenses incurred in bringing the action.

(b) Compensatory damages awarded under Subsection (a)(3) may not exceed $10,000 for each entire, distinct controversy, without regard to the number of members or other persons within a religious group who claim injury as a result of the government agency's exercise of governmental authority. A claimant is not entitled to recover exemplary damages under this chapter.

(c) An action under this section must be brought in district court.

(d) A person may not bring an action for damages or declaratory or injunctive relief against an individual, other than an action brought against an individual acting in the individual's official capacity as an officer of a government agency.

(e) This chapter does not affect the application of Section 498.0045 or 501.008, Government Code, or Chapter 14 of this code.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.




Sec. 110.006. NOTICE; RIGHT TO ACCOMMODATE. (a) A person may not bring an action to assert a claim under this chapter unless, 60 days before bringing the action, the person gives written notice to the government agency by certified mail, return receipt requested:

(1) that the person's free exercise of religion is substantially burdened by an exercise of the government agency's governmental authority;

(2) of the particular act or refusal to act that is burdened; and

(3) of the manner in which the exercise of governmental authority burdens the act or refusal to act.

(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), a claimant may, within the 60-day period established by Subsection (a), bring an action for declaratory or injunctive relief and associated attorney's fees, court costs, and other reasonable expenses, if:

(1) the exercise of governmental authority that threatens to substantially burden the person's free exercise of religion is imminent; and

(2) the person was not informed and did not otherwise have knowledge of the exercise of the governmental authority in time to reasonably provide the notice.

(c) A government agency that receives a notice under Subsection (a) may remedy the substantial burden on the person's free exercise of religion.

(d) A remedy implemented by a government agency under this section:

(1) may be designed to reasonably remove the substantial burden on the person's free exercise of religion;

(2) need not be implemented in a manner that results in an exercise of governmental authority that is the least restrictive means of furthering the governmental interest, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter; and

(3) must be narrowly tailored to remove the particular burden for which the remedy is implemented.

(e) A person with respect to whom a substantial burden on the person's free exercise of religion has been cured by a remedy implemented under this section may not bring an action under Section 110.005.

(f) A person who complies with an inmate grievance system as required under Section 501.008, Government Code, is not required to provide a separate written notice under Subsection (a). In conjunction with the inmate grievance system, the government agency may remedy a substantial burden on the person's free exercise of religion in the manner described by, and subject to, Subsections (c), (d), and (e).

(g) In dealing with a claim that a person's free exercise of religion has been substantially burdened in violation of this chapter, an inmate grievance system, including an inmate grievance system required under Section 501.008, Government Code, must provide to the person making the claim a statement of the government agency's rationale for imposing the burden, if any exists, in connection with any adverse determination made in connection with the claim.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.




Sec. 110.007. ONE-YEAR LIMITATIONS PERIOD. (a) A person must bring an action to assert a claim for damages under this chapter not later than one year after the date the person knew or should have known of the substantial burden on the person's free exercise of religion.

(b) Mailing notice under Section 110.006 tolls the limitations period established under this section until the 75th day after the date on which the notice was mailed.


Added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Aug. 30, 1999.



110.006, sovereign immunity to suit and from liability is waived and abolished to the extent of liability created by Section 110.005, and a claimant may sue a government agency for damages allowed by that section.

(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), this chapter does not waive or abolish sovereign immunity to suit and from liability under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And the US Bill of Rights (1st Amendment) and Texas Bill of Rights (Article 6) say that laws can't be made against any Religion.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
And since they used the Forensic Lab to test my Religious Materials, they could try to make laws against what they found (since it is all currently legal), but if they do that I get to be part of a City of Hialeah V Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, -esk case.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
I'm guessing they spent all our tax dollar's to do NMR testing, and I even told them they could just call me and ask "what's the one that... What's the one that...?"
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
The Narcotics Conspiracy Sergeant told me to go up to Austin's Forensic Lab yesterday, so I went (details in an earlier post). Then he told me to go back up there today to get my stuff, so I went.

First they just seemed confused, then they tried to have someone tell me they don't keep things there, so I showed them the email where the Narcotics Conspiracy Sergeant told me it was there. Then they had someone else come out and tell me the chemist wasn't there, then I told him to just go get my shit, so they called out a cop and a detective and I talked to them and we called the Sergeant and I have to go up next week to get it because the chemist wasn't there.
 
Top