January 6th hearings on Trump's failed insurrection.

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
Judge sets July trial date in Bannon case
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols said during a pretrial hearing that while he was not convinced by federal prosecutors' efforts to accelerate the schedule, he did not believe that a trial should wait for nearly a year, as Bannon's defense team had argued

While Nichols's scheduling order did not give the defense as much time to prepare as they asked for, the summer trial date could hamper the select committee's ability to get information out of the one-time Trump White House strategist.

The judge indicated on Tuesday that he would allot about two weeks of time for the trial, meaning that it could wrap up in early August, just three months before the 2022 midterms.
he has to stay in a cell until then, right? the fat rummy doesn't get to run loose spreading more shit till then, does he?
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
I'm 61 years old, been married 41 years, have raised 3 incredible kids, have since 6 grandchildren, have been self employed for most of my entire career and currently run a very successful business that I started from scratch 18 years ago, spent 6 years in the Marines, lived in Alaska, California, Washington, and North Carolina, and even pastored a church for 20 years, building it from the ground up (during my religious stint in life). I've been around the block, more than once. And I grow fantastic fucking weed! I'm also an athlete, take no fucking meds, and I'm actually a nice guy. And, I don't watch the fucking news! I stay informed, but not by sitting in front of a TV while CNN, FOX, CBS, and all of the other media outlets pour out their constant negative bullshit that does nothing but go in circles. I have better things to do.

And I never joined Rollitup to talk politics, and quite frankly, I think it's sad that people do. But hey, what the fuck. And I strummed through this Thread watching everyone plow Trump under the bus. Shit, you want to see an insurrection, go back to 1861. Not only did countless motherfuckers die in the Civil War, the Confederates almost took over the White House and wanted to oust and kill Lincoln, which eventually did happen. This little protest, where a guy dressed up like a fucking bull, stealing a lectern is a fucking joke. And if this was a real Civil War, there would have been dead bodies everywhere.

And I'm so tired of people dropping Trump bombs, while a lunatic is in the White House running our Country. If this is the best the Democrats can do, and people keep voting for these left wing whackos, we are in deep shit. We are the laughing stock of the World and our enemies are going bonkers building up their military while this weak ass crazy fucker is taking a nap. Biden hasn't done jack shit in his 40 year political career. Go ahead, name one major accomplishment. Look at the circus at the Southern Border. Look at inflation. Look at the tax and spend spree the Democrats want to take this Country on. Like I said, we better wake the fuck up or this great Country will see an actual Civil War.
well, you're fucked then...you got to 61 and you never got over being an angry young man...everyone i know like that has died before 65, stroke, heart attack, gun shot wound from running their mouths to the wrong people...hope you do better...
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
I'm 61 years old, been married 41 years, have raised 3 incredible kids, have since 6 grandchildren, have been self employed for most of my entire career and currently run a very successful business that I started from scratch 18 years ago, spent 6 years in the Marines, lived in Alaska, California, Washington, and North Carolina, and even pastored a church for 20 years, building it from the ground up (during my religious stint in life). I've been around the block, more than once. And I grow fantastic fucking weed! I'm also an athlete, take no fucking meds, and I'm actually a nice guy. And, I don't watch the fucking news! I stay informed, but not by sitting in front of a TV while CNN, FOX, CBS, and all of the other media outlets pour out their constant negative bullshit that does nothing but go in circles. I have better things to do.

And I never joined Rollitup to talk politics, and quite frankly, I think it's sad that people do. But hey, what the fuck. And I strummed through this Thread watching everyone plow Trump under the bus. Shit, you want to see an insurrection, go back to 1861. Not only did countless motherfuckers die in the Civil War, the Confederates almost took over the White House and wanted to oust and kill Lincoln, which eventually did happen. This little protest, where a guy dressed up like a fucking bull, stealing a lectern is a fucking joke. And if this was a real Civil War, there would have been dead bodies everywhere.

And I'm so tired of people dropping Trump bombs, while a lunatic is in the White House running our Country. If this is the best the Democrats can do, and people keep voting for these left wing whackos, we are in deep shit. We are the laughing stock of the World and our enemies are going bonkers building up their military while this weak ass crazy fucker is taking a nap. Biden hasn't done jack shit in his 40 year political career. Go ahead, name one major accomplishment. Look at the circus at the Southern Border. Look at inflation. Look at the tax and spend spree the Democrats want to take this Country on. Like I said, we better wake the fuck up or this great Country will see an actual Civil War.
You must not read the news. The lunatic in the White House has been succeeded by an average Joe.
 

HGCC

Well-Known Member
I am having a hard time with "radical Leftist Joe biden."

Tan suites and Dijon mustard....motherfucker let's burn it down! Wild times. So much radical.

That view is why I think trying to constantly tack to the center is silly. The democrats party keeps moving towards the right, the Republicans also move right. Now the center is some weird bullshit and still...an 80 year old boring as shit dude that a bunch are viewing as a pussy is now a radical Leftist.

We can't even get single payer. Fuck.
 

mooray

Well-Known Member
I am having a hard time with "radical Leftist Joe biden."

Tan suites and Dijon mustard....motherfucker let's burn it down! Wild times. So much radical.

That view is why I think trying to constantly tack to the center is silly. The democrats party keeps moving towards the right, the Republicans also move right. Now the center is some weird bullshit and still...an 80 year old boring as shit dude that a bunch are viewing as a pussy is now a radical Leftist.

We can't even get single payer. Fuck.
They'll tell you the opposite, that they're only pushing back to a party/world that's shifting to the extreme left.

When you look at actions, they complain about the Green New Deal and other bills that are endlessly circling the drain, while simultaneously ignoring fifty years of abortion laws that are actually being changed. Their main metric/reference is just their feelings.
 

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
I am having a hard time with "radical Leftist Joe biden."

Tan suites and Dijon mustard....motherfucker let's burn it down! Wild times. So much radical.

That view is why I think trying to constantly tack to the center is silly. The democrats party keeps moving towards the right, the Republicans also move right. Now the center is some weird bullshit and still...an 80 year old boring as shit dude that a bunch are viewing as a pussy is now a radical Leftist.

We can't even get single payer. Fuck.
It illustrates how dishonestly the Fascist right defines the left. Every time I see a centrist get tagged “far left” that dishonesty, and the authoritarian intention, is on display.
 

printer

Well-Known Member
Meadows suing Pelosi, Jan. 6 committee
In a civil complaint filed Wednesday afternoon, Meadows's lawyers said the select committee does not have the authority to issue the subpoenas directed at him or obtain his phone records from a third party and that President Biden's refusal to assert executive privilege opens constitutional questions that should be decided through legal action.

"As a result, Mr. Meadows, a witness, has been put in the untenable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims that are of constitutional origin and dimension and having to either risk enforcement of the subpoena issued to him, not merely by the House of Representatives, but through actions by the Executive and Judicial Branches, or, alternatively, unilaterally abandoning the former president’s claims of privileges and immunities," the complaint reads. "Thus, Mr. Meadows turns to the courts to say what the law is."

The lawsuit says Meadows believed the committee would "act in good faith" until he learned over the weekend the lawmakers had subpoenaed Verizon for his personal phone records. The telecommunications company told Meadows in a letter dated Saturday that it would comply with the committee's subpoena by Dec. 15 unless a court ordered otherwise.

"If indeed Mr. Meadows refuses to appear, the Select Committee will be left no choice but to advance contempt proceedings and recommend that the body in which Mr. Meadows once served refer him for criminal prosecution," Thompson said in a joint statement Tuesday with the committee's vice chairwoman, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.).

Thompson said that Meadows needs to tell the committee "about voluminous official records stored in his personal phone and email accounts, which were required to be turned over to the National Archives in accordance with the Presidential Records Act."

"The Select Committee’s subpoena to Mr. Meadows unlawfully seeks information covered by executive privilege and improperly attempts to compel testimony by a senior Executive Branch official," the lawsuit reads. "During his time as Chief of Staff, Mr. Meadows was among the most senior Executive Branch officials and his communications and deliberations were covered by executive privilege."
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
Meadows suing Pelosi, Jan. 6 committee
In a civil complaint filed Wednesday afternoon, Meadows's lawyers said the select committee does not have the authority to issue the subpoenas directed at him or obtain his phone records from a third party and that President Biden's refusal to assert executive privilege opens constitutional questions that should be decided through legal action.

"As a result, Mr. Meadows, a witness, has been put in the untenable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims that are of constitutional origin and dimension and having to either risk enforcement of the subpoena issued to him, not merely by the House of Representatives, but through actions by the Executive and Judicial Branches, or, alternatively, unilaterally abandoning the former president’s claims of privileges and immunities," the complaint reads. "Thus, Mr. Meadows turns to the courts to say what the law is."

The lawsuit says Meadows believed the committee would "act in good faith" until he learned over the weekend the lawmakers had subpoenaed Verizon for his personal phone records. The telecommunications company told Meadows in a letter dated Saturday that it would comply with the committee's subpoena by Dec. 15 unless a court ordered otherwise.

"If indeed Mr. Meadows refuses to appear, the Select Committee will be left no choice but to advance contempt proceedings and recommend that the body in which Mr. Meadows once served refer him for criminal prosecution," Thompson said in a joint statement Tuesday with the committee's vice chairwoman, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.).

Thompson said that Meadows needs to tell the committee "about voluminous official records stored in his personal phone and email accounts, which were required to be turned over to the National Archives in accordance with the Presidential Records Act."

"The Select Committee’s subpoena to Mr. Meadows unlawfully seeks information covered by executive privilege and improperly attempts to compel testimony by a senior Executive Branch official," the lawsuit reads. "During his time as Chief of Staff, Mr. Meadows was among the most senior Executive Branch officials and his communications and deliberations were covered by executive privilege."
Maybe, he still could just be playing the clock to stretch it out a bit by pretending that he is going to cooperate but as soon as he gets asked anything he then claims Executive Privilege/5th.

Lucy and the football kind of game is something that should be expected at this point.

Hopefully the courts will go full Peter Griffin on Meadows.

And Charlie Brown can finally kick the football.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Mark Meadows In Contempt of Congress & With No Viable Executive Privilege, It's Indictment Time

Donald Trump's former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows committed the crime of contempt of Congress today by failing to appear on a lawfully issued congressional subpoena. The committee has announced it will move to hold Meadows in contempt and refer him for criminal prosecution.

Although Meadows is trying to claim executive privilege (and there is some caselaw from the Nixon days suggesting a former president might have some lingering executive privilege), this video sets out the three reasons any executive privilege claim by Meadows should be rejected.

Also, the committee reveals a deeply incriminate text from November 6, 2020 - after Trump lost the election - showing that Meadows was all in on the efforts to corruptly overturn the election results. So with nowhere left to go, Meadows decides his best play is . . . to file a frivolous lawsuit against Nancy Pelosi and the House select committee in a transparent attempt to weaponize the courts, delay the matter and run out the clock - a page straight out of Trump's playbook. .
 

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Meadows suing Pelosi, Jan. 6 committee
In a civil complaint filed Wednesday afternoon, Meadows's lawyers said the select committee does not have the authority to issue the subpoenas directed at him or obtain his phone records from a third party and that President Biden's refusal to assert executive privilege opens constitutional questions that should be decided through legal action.

"As a result, Mr. Meadows, a witness, has been put in the untenable position of choosing between conflicting privilege claims that are of constitutional origin and dimension and having to either risk enforcement of the subpoena issued to him, not merely by the House of Representatives, but through actions by the Executive and Judicial Branches, or, alternatively, unilaterally abandoning the former president’s claims of privileges and immunities," the complaint reads. "Thus, Mr. Meadows turns to the courts to say what the law is."

The lawsuit says Meadows believed the committee would "act in good faith" until he learned over the weekend the lawmakers had subpoenaed Verizon for his personal phone records. The telecommunications company told Meadows in a letter dated Saturday that it would comply with the committee's subpoena by Dec. 15 unless a court ordered otherwise.

"If indeed Mr. Meadows refuses to appear, the Select Committee will be left no choice but to advance contempt proceedings and recommend that the body in which Mr. Meadows once served refer him for criminal prosecution," Thompson said in a joint statement Tuesday with the committee's vice chairwoman, Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.).

Thompson said that Meadows needs to tell the committee "about voluminous official records stored in his personal phone and email accounts, which were required to be turned over to the National Archives in accordance with the Presidential Records Act."

"The Select Committee’s subpoena to Mr. Meadows unlawfully seeks information covered by executive privilege and improperly attempts to compel testimony by a senior Executive Branch official," the lawsuit reads. "During his time as Chief of Staff, Mr. Meadows was among the most senior Executive Branch officials and his communications and deliberations were covered by executive privilege."
Executive Privilege that are of Constitutional origin is designated for Sitting President only.

If Mark Meadows claims Trump President of the World; will we hear it?

i know we'll add up all of Trumps holdings and declare him president based upon accomplishment WTF?!!!!!!!!!!

some how some way he will not stop until he has 'president' in front of his name, locked up or dead.

1639054478005.png

this kind of person never stops and must be removed in some way from the landscape or we're goners..just like Vermim Supreme never stops but he's just eccentric.
 
Last edited:

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
Hopefully the courts will go full Peter Griffin on Meadows.

And Charlie Brown can finally kick the football.
the Charlie Brown football thing is often referred to by men i speak with (not meaning this post) IRL and here.

you guys have really been traumatized by that; the writer didn't realize what he was doing to our future men by emasculating.

FTW i am not a fan of Charlie Brown franchise even as a kid;; had to watch it because it was what was on. Lucy was a bully and then some.
 
Last edited:
Top