Carne Seca
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry you didn't understand that your sentence structure was the issue, not my memory.I'm sorry that brain don't retain information about America bailing out gm.
I'm sorry you didn't understand that your sentence structure was the issue, not my memory.I'm sorry that brain don't retain information about America bailing out gm.
hmm.. aren't you the one always saying you need proof? Well, where is it? What's good for the goose is good for the gander.I can't find it. But it is a statistical fact. It would take me an hour to compile a data timeline on my own. You don't have to believe me, but if you can prove otherwise than I will admit that I'm wrong
What? No way dude the burden of proof is on you.I can't find it. But it is a statistical fact. It would take me an hour to compile a data timeline on my own. You don't have to believe me, but if you can prove otherwise than I will admit that I'm wrong
Don't get your panties in a twist. I said don't believe me! I could care less simpletonWhat? No way dude the burden of proof is on you.
You 2 don't have any proof that I'm wrong otherwise you would have spewed it all over the thread by now. I know liberals better than you all know yourselves.hmm.. aren't you the one always saying you need proof? Well, where is it? What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Yeah, sure.Don't get your panties in a twist. I said don't believe me! I could care less simpleton
Yeah, sure.
Tell me, what exactly happens to the economy whenever Obama speaks? You say more jobs just get lost, what about Obama speaking would cause that? It sounds like an awesome talking point, but there has to be causation - do you have any evidence?
And what is normal for new unemployment claims during a period of 6% unemploymentBut that was then and this is now and the president is pandering to his union base and somebody has to pay for his union jobs program.
The weekly jobless claims report came out with 428,000 people filing for first time unemployment benefits, which was significantly higher than the 412,000 economists had expected; and, the 414,000 figure from last week was adjusted up to 417,000, according to Rueters.
More important however, as a Bloomberg chart helps to illustrate, is the fact that the 4-week moving average figure rose from 415,500 to 419,500, a distinct upward trend, which began when President Obama began touting his highly-hyped jobs plan
If you have a question look it up. Lazy socialistAnd what is normal for new unemployment claims during a period of 6% unemployment
Do you have a answer?
And what were the number of New Unemployment claims being filed january of 2009 when Obama took office?
hmm.. aren't you the one always saying you need proof? Well, where is it? What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
What? No way dude the burden of proof is on you.
Yeah, sure.
Tell me, what exactly happens to the economy whenever Obama speaks? You say more jobs just get lost, what about Obama speaking would cause that? It sounds like an awesome talking point, but there has to be causation - do you have any evidence?
Already didIf you have a question look it up. Lazy socialist
I'm not a republican!Already did DICKHEAD
In Good times new Unemployment claims hover around 400000 a week
When Obama Took Office they passed the half million mark
Look I know its all fun coming here to "rattle the Liberals" from the Free Republic website
But your not capable of the job. You are an Idiot
I'm sure all real conservatives are relievedI'm not a republican!
Ya whatever
Business people hire when they need more people to meet demand
If they dont sell
They dont hire
Sorry mr. moneybags aint gonna lay off a guy if it means he cant meet demand
any other idiotic economic theorys you wish to toss off to?