infrared
Active Member
My last grow was similar to the first in that I made a bunch of mistakes and learned a ton about this plant as a result. It was dissimilar in the sense that popping my own seeds in round two led to finding an extra frosty Kushberry pheno, one that I'll be growing six (or seven) plants for this, my third grow cycle.
These cuttings were taken on New Year's and put into a 2:1 Roots Organics and perlite on January 14th. They'd only gotten tap water in the 40ppm range along with 1mL Roots Excelurator set to 6.4-6.6 pH.
'Life' got in the way of these getting the kind of attention I would have liked, but they seem healthy after two weeks in the soil spent mostly under T5s, and the last several days under a 600w MH. The reflector's been at various heights in an attempt to combat some of the leaf curling (they also stretched a bit ) you see from heat stress. I finally got the materials necessary for a proper exhaust and now the numbers are right around 75deg and 50% rh.
These six were transplanted into 5 gallon containers (three each hard plastic and Smart Pots) of 2:1 Sunshine Mix #4 and perlite combo plus 1c/cu ft of dolomite lime on February 2nd. They were 'supposed' to get 1.25mL ProTekt, 2.5mL Dyna-Gro Grow and 1mL Roots Excelurator, but I severely underestimated this mix' water retention capacity. After the first plant it was clear I wouldn't have enough dechlorinated water to make enough nutes, I began to use the 'plain' (just RE) water to get up to a small runoff. A couple ended up getting more of this 'plain' solution than the nutes, but it was about 50/50 all around. Each plant got about three quarts and all of that will be a nutrient solution next time.
The roots were sufficiently robust when I transplanted these that I believe they should have been done earlier. I also wanted to top them earlier, but wanted to wait a couple days before adding more stress. I cut each one down to 6 nodes (7 in the cases where the bottom one is puny) and might top again to get these really bushy before they go under a 1000w HPS for flower. I'm probably going to put a relatively young clone right in the middle too so that the canopy has a shape that maximizes the footprint, as well as a bit of a comparison between the two styles' outputs.
These cuttings were taken on New Year's and put into a 2:1 Roots Organics and perlite on January 14th. They'd only gotten tap water in the 40ppm range along with 1mL Roots Excelurator set to 6.4-6.6 pH.
'Life' got in the way of these getting the kind of attention I would have liked, but they seem healthy after two weeks in the soil spent mostly under T5s, and the last several days under a 600w MH. The reflector's been at various heights in an attempt to combat some of the leaf curling (they also stretched a bit ) you see from heat stress. I finally got the materials necessary for a proper exhaust and now the numbers are right around 75deg and 50% rh.
These six were transplanted into 5 gallon containers (three each hard plastic and Smart Pots) of 2:1 Sunshine Mix #4 and perlite combo plus 1c/cu ft of dolomite lime on February 2nd. They were 'supposed' to get 1.25mL ProTekt, 2.5mL Dyna-Gro Grow and 1mL Roots Excelurator, but I severely underestimated this mix' water retention capacity. After the first plant it was clear I wouldn't have enough dechlorinated water to make enough nutes, I began to use the 'plain' (just RE) water to get up to a small runoff. A couple ended up getting more of this 'plain' solution than the nutes, but it was about 50/50 all around. Each plant got about three quarts and all of that will be a nutrient solution next time.
The roots were sufficiently robust when I transplanted these that I believe they should have been done earlier. I also wanted to top them earlier, but wanted to wait a couple days before adding more stress. I cut each one down to 6 nodes (7 in the cases where the bottom one is puny) and might top again to get these really bushy before they go under a 1000w HPS for flower. I'm probably going to put a relatively young clone right in the middle too so that the canopy has a shape that maximizes the footprint, as well as a bit of a comparison between the two styles' outputs.