IceStoner420
Member
R. v. Mernagh 2011 Ontario Superior Court
On April 12th, 2011, Justice Donald Taliano found that Canada's Marijuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) and "the prohibitions against the possession and production of cannabis (marijuana) contained in sections 4 and 7 respectively of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act" are "constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect". The government has 90 days from this date (until July 11th) to fill the void in those sections or the possession and cultivation of Marijuana will become legal in all of Canada. This includes the non-medical use of the drug. The governing body may choose to appeal this decision, however, if it is denied as their last appeal was, there will be no shortage of scrambling to fix the gaping hole in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, as there is currently no backup plan agreed upon.
What do you guys think? I read this article in Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_Canada
On April 12th, 2011, Justice Donald Taliano found that Canada's Marijuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR) and "the prohibitions against the possession and production of cannabis (marijuana) contained in sections 4 and 7 respectively of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act" are "constitutionally invalid and of no force and effect". The government has 90 days from this date (until July 11th) to fill the void in those sections or the possession and cultivation of Marijuana will become legal in all of Canada. This includes the non-medical use of the drug. The governing body may choose to appeal this decision, however, if it is denied as their last appeal was, there will be no shortage of scrambling to fix the gaping hole in the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, as there is currently no backup plan agreed upon.
What do you guys think? I read this article in Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_Canada