legitimacy of strains in breeder crosses

silverhazefiend said:
If a strain is really good it will last the test of time no amount of hype can save it with that said we do have some that’s here to stay and cookies even with the sketchy history is for sure one of them

Gsc ,Gg4 ,Gelato ,Sherbert ,Zkittlez ,cherry pie those strains are the building blocks of the last 10 years of new strains and are deff worth the hype

wedding cake / ice / birthday.. runtz / kush mints / MAC1 are deff more than just hype and are becoming the building blocks of the next generation.. to say that it’s not improving is not true

Now I agree with the saturation of the market it will make it seem like nothing new is happening but when u step back and look at it as a whole for sure it’s making moves and with everyone tryna to make the same move first with the same gene pool it gets boring quick

The good thing Is it brings room for nostalgia and that is what keeps it fresh .. there’s been a huge resurgence of haze and hybrids with strains like bandaid haze and A5 haze being really sought after .. I just had some really good real blue dream and the disappointment on people’s faces when I said it was finished .. that taste and High is special u won’t find it in the newer hybrids not everyone wants to be stoned like a zombie
Click to expand...
I totally agree with you here. Once people take a step back from the daily popularity contest over at Instagram, and start really thinking about what's in their weed's genetics as a whole, then they can see that breeders like Prof P from Dynasty, SkunkVA, Caleb from CSI Humboldt, and many other notable breeders, are still actively moving the cannabis genetic pool forward in the right ways. It's all about the name game majority of the time too.
 
DrOgkush said:
weedmaps.com

The strains that made Cookies

When it comes to cannabis culture and products, few names ring off in the streets like Cookies. Its genetics have been used to create some of the most popular strains...
weedmaps.com weedmaps.com
Click to expand...
Dude, I could post up a link from 2009 (with no mention of either of the two) when they were talking about cookies. As a matter of fact, you can go the ThcFarmer and find a few conversations around that time period. So it's safe to say that those two didn't create cookies; they just popularized and capitalized on it.
 
catdaddy516 said:
Dude, I could post up a link from 2009 (with no mention of either of the two) when they were talking about cookies. As a matter of fact, you can go the ThcFarmer and find a few conversations around that time period. So it's safe to say that those two didn't create cookies; they just popularized and capitalized on it.
Click to expand...
Ok
 
catdaddy516 said:
Dude, I could post up a link from 2009 (with no mention of either of the two) when they were talking about cookies. As a matter of fact, you can go the ThcFarmer and find a few conversations around that time period. So it's safe to say that those two didn't create cookies; they just popularized and capitalized on it.
Click to expand...
You must be from the area then?
 
lusidghost said:
Cookies were cut only back then, and outside west coast dispensaries it was pretty unknown. Now it’s up there with OG as far as name recognition goes.
Click to expand...
This is a joke, I was buying cookies december 2012 and selling it with my homegrown. It's been popular in NYC since 2012.
 
Cookies started a strain then made into a brand.

Let me just say, cuts get out. All it takes is one snip and a pocket full of cash for a breeder cut to make it from the cookies grow facility to Detroit Michigan.

Some breeder lie, they usually end up with quick cash grabbing attempts. Some tell the truth, and are around for years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top