sunny747
Well-Known Member
I suspect that the claims of many LED manufacturers aren't supported by reality. The claims would be that they run cool and save you a lot of money on electricity.
I am speaking of low end 3 or 5w diode LED's. Not COB's. New growers or people that have not owned LED believe that LED is going to be drastically cooler and or drastically easier on their electric bill. In my experience this is not accurate and all things considered HID is still the way to go.
For comparison purposes let's assume a 3x3x 6 grow space.
Tent A has an air cooled 400w MH/HPS and a 180 CFM fan and filter.
Tent B would have a MARS hydro LED. I chose MARS only because a lot of people have them and they seem to be the best of the low cost LED's.
How many watts of "inexpensie" LED would the grower truly need to produce comparable results to the 400 HID?
what is the difference in efficiency between inexpensive LED's and HID?
Assume you sealed the two tents completely and ran no air or fans. What would the temp difference be?
It's my understanding and limited experience with an Apollo LED that leads me to believe that you need nearly the same amount of electricity to produce good yields whether you are using HID or cheap LED. I also am leaning towards the answer that LED may be cool to the touch, but heat is still a major consideration and cooling of the tent will likely be required.
Thanks for any input.
I am speaking of low end 3 or 5w diode LED's. Not COB's. New growers or people that have not owned LED believe that LED is going to be drastically cooler and or drastically easier on their electric bill. In my experience this is not accurate and all things considered HID is still the way to go.
For comparison purposes let's assume a 3x3x 6 grow space.
Tent A has an air cooled 400w MH/HPS and a 180 CFM fan and filter.
Tent B would have a MARS hydro LED. I chose MARS only because a lot of people have them and they seem to be the best of the low cost LED's.
How many watts of "inexpensie" LED would the grower truly need to produce comparable results to the 400 HID?
what is the difference in efficiency between inexpensive LED's and HID?
Assume you sealed the two tents completely and ran no air or fans. What would the temp difference be?
It's my understanding and limited experience with an Apollo LED that leads me to believe that you need nearly the same amount of electricity to produce good yields whether you are using HID or cheap LED. I also am leaning towards the answer that LED may be cool to the touch, but heat is still a major consideration and cooling of the tent will likely be required.
Thanks for any input.