So you weren't able to find a citation.
I found 36 million ones that seem to disagreee with you.
Liberal Media Desperately Trying To Cover-up Violent Knockout Game
- Thread starter beenthere
- Start date
I found 36 million ones that seem to disagreee with you.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
You want me to link a dictionary entry?
Are you saying that liberalism is not a political philosophy of capitalism, privatization, free markets, and even fascism?
Yes, please copy and paste a dictionary link that says that Liberalism is a centrist political theory.
Mainstream Dictionary too.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Link one that says it is not. I already backed my claim. Liberalism is a form of capitalism with private ownership of the means of production. By definition.
Therefore it is not on the left. If you want to find the word centrist in the definition you're moving the goal post.
I already did.
I think You are confusing an economic liberal with a political liberal.
Backing a claim with opinion isn't backing a claim, its just more opinion.
echelon1k1
New Member
Then I cannot even image where it leaves the bottom of the barrel anarchists like yourself - they have to be some of the stupidest people on the planet.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Trying to separate the economy from politics is bullshit. Yet again you move the goalposts.
It wasn't my opinion either. Liberalism is a form of capitalism with private ownership of the means of production, by definition.
Moving the goalposts would be claiming that Liberalism isn't on the left side of the political sphere, then claiming something about it being the private ownership of the means of production.
Your premise was that it wasn't on the lefty side of political thought, but then you moved the goalposts while accusing me of the same.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
You're a clown.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
your "peer reviewed scientific study" WAS A POLL ABOUT FOX NEWS.
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/foxnews.asp
there have been many attrempts by lefties to create statistical linkages between leftism and intelligence, as well as conservatism and stupidity but all have been pilloried by the "peer review" system as pointless claptrap.
the latest attempt to put "The Science of Psychology" to work "proving" anyone who doesnt believe the leftist party line is a moron, was done in singapore for fuck's sake.
thats why you never link to these "scientific Studies" you harp on, the only one any lefty ever "cited" was the retarded OPINION POLL about fox news viewers being "less informed" than those who "consumed no media"
that shitty attempt (which was also claimed was a "scientific study") was demolished so thoroughly, the left dares not openly use it again.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
and Scientology is called "The New Science of the Human Mind", and it even has "Science" and "ology" in the name, so it MUST BE AWESOME!!
the "study" nodrama cited was PUBLISHED.
you can PUBLISH anything.
it has not been accepted, or even found noteworthy, being cited by only ONE other paper.
eugenics theorists were also "peer reviewed" and unlike this hogwash, they were extensively cited, widely accepted by academia, and celebrated as visionary before they were ultimately discovered to be idiots.
Dr Kynes
Well-Known Member
Liberalism (neither classical nor modern re-brandings) does not relate to capitalism, or the ownership of the "Means of Production" (which the astute reader recalls, includes SHOVELS AND SEEDS in your dystopian vision) but rather liberty versus oppression.
the Liberalism of the enlightenment age did not have a thing to do with who owns what, but rather whether you OWN YOURSELF. the only property redistributed under Classical Liberalism was The Serf.
modern leftist "Progressiveism" also does not particularly deal with the ownership of property, as "liberalism" freely encompasses communists, collectivists, capitalists and even trillionaires like warren buffet and george soros under it's banner.
modern "liberalism" is simply Newspeak for Government Control of thought and deed, reducing the populace to subservient drones who must never speak out against their "betters" lest assholes like you label them as being "Negatively Correlated with Intelligence"
for somebody weho screams and crys when an ACCURATE labelk is applied to your ideology (Marxism) you sure do love to slap INACCURATE labels on everything and everyone who comes in reach.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Tldr the bullshit diatribe where kkkynes says I believe this or that.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Yet sociology is still an academic discipline.
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
Conservatism and cognitive ability have been negatively correlated by science and all the Republicans can do is to express disdain for science.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you are so fucking stupid.
better than doing what you do, and showing off a complete lack of intelligence on a message board.
you are pathetic in every way, beenthere. just pathetic. and i feel sorry for you.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
what part of buying into the "skewed polls" theory and bleating about it for months was pragmatic?
you are a deluded right wing conspiracy theorist, and a rather pathetic one at that. a mere follower.
you are pathetic and i feel sorry for you.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
citation needed, liar.
why you gotta lie so often on a fucking cannabis message board?
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
If you feel sorry for him now, wait until you see the shitty yellow moldy turds he calls good weed.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
does he even reality, bro?