Liberals show their true colours once again. Cons in sheeps clothing

VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
TheDizzyBizzy said:
Liar. Why do you lie so often?

Mulcair never spoke of a ticketing system.You can decriminalize without ticketing. You liberals lie as much as the conbots.
Click to expand...
Explain the difference between legalization and decriminalization. Anything that doesn't carry a penalty is legal...if it is decriminalized it simply means there is no court date, just a ticket. Show me one instance of decriminalization that does not involve fines. Prove me wrong before calling me a liar.
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
But you have to be careful what you wish for,imo. If we got decrim, there would be no public support to further move to legalization.It also leaves my kids as walking ATM's for the cops. It needs to be taken out of the criminal code to protect everyone...decrim won't do that. I've waited this long. What he's pissing me off about is not fixing the medical about 3 minutes after he took office. That doesn't take any new laws. Reinstate the mmar and use LP's instead of the old PPS for those that choose to buy. Start by immediately dropping the appeal.
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
I don't think they will. Hiding it among other bills as you suggested is impossible at this point...people will notice. Saying "It won't be ratified" would be just as accurate as your suggestion it will be. Fact is, we don't know. What I would like to know, is how this has the slightest impact on medical marijuana? Could it be someone with limited knowledge or interest in medical marijuana is hijacking this forum to push their warped perspective on politics? Who started this thread....
Click to expand...
They wouldn't have signed it. If they don't ratify it they will be put under intense international pressure. It will be ratified. This effects everything we do actually. Any rules we make about marijuana can be challenged under this agreement and changed with absolutely no discourse or legal challenge available to Canadians. Yay facist corporatist kangaroo courts.
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
But you have to be careful what you wish for,imo. If we got decrim, there would be no public support to further move to legalization.It also leaves my kids as walking ATM's for the cops. It needs to be taken out of the criminal code to protect everyone...decrim won't do that. I've waited this long. What he's pissing me off about is not fixing the medical about 3 minutes after he took office. That doesn't take any new laws. Reinstate the mmar and use LP's instead of the old PPS for those that choose to buy. Start by immediately dropping the appeal.
Click to expand...
It's interesting you take this position on decrim but then flip and say we should accept whatever legalization they throw at us because it's part of the process (which you have undoubtedly said repeatedly).

I'd argue decrim is less likely to wind up like that than the legalization schemes proposed, but neither option is a good option.
 
T

TheDizzyBizzy

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
It's interesting you take this position on decrim but then flip and say we should accept whatever legalization they throw at us because it's part of the process (which you have undoubtedly said repeatedly).
Click to expand...
You noticed that, too? That's because Chris drank the Liberal juice, just like the Harperbots drank their dear leader's juice.

Anyone with a brain knew Trudeau was a liar, just like his LPC predecessors. Only a child could not know the history of the Liberal party and their strong of broken promises.
 
doingdishes

doingdishes

Well-Known Member
one day Canada will try out a new party...Lib's or Con's forever.
Canadians get mad at the Libs so they vote in the Cons..then get pissed at the cons so they vote in the Libs...etc etc.
things only change when things really change...one day
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
It's interesting you take this position on decrim but then flip and say we should accept whatever legalization they throw at us because it's part of the process (which you have undoubtedly said repeatedly).

I'd argue decrim is less likely to wind up like that than the legalization schemes proposed, but neither option is a good option.
Click to expand...
Help me out...where did I flip and where did I say "accept whatever legalization they throw at us"? You make a statement like that, you must be able to quote where I've said that. Go on, look through all my posts and get back to me.
What is "decrim is less likely to wind up like that than the legalization schemes proposed" supposed to mean? Wind up like what?
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
TheDizzyBizzy said:
You noticed that, too? That's because Chris drank the Liberal juice, just like the Harperbots drank their dear leader's juice.

Anyone with a brain knew Trudeau was a liar, just like his LPC predecessors. Only a child could not know the history of the Liberal party and their strong of broken promises.
Click to expand...
Yawn.
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
Help me out...where did I flip and where did I say "accept whatever legalization they throw at us"? You make a statement like that, you must be able to quote where I've said that. Go on, look through all my posts and get back to me.
What is "decrim is less likely to wind up like that than the legalization schemes proposed" supposed to mean? Wind up like what?
Click to expand...
Dude, you've said it... you've said we should be happy that the Liberals are going to regulate the hell out of the industry and we should be willing to accept whatever regulations because that's what Canadians are going to want when I argued that there should be no rules or regulations beyond those that apply to growing tomatoes and that accepting these regulations would result in tremendous apathy...

I'm not going to dig it up. If you want to deny it... fine.

More over, allow me to ask you - when was the last time Canada signed a treaty and didn't ratify it ? I'm looking currently... I studied Poly Sci/Econ in school, and I don't recall any examples off the top of my head but memory is far from perfect.
 
VIANARCHRIS

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
Dude, you've said it... you've said we should be happy that the Liberals are going to regulate the hell out of the industry and we should be willing to accept whatever regulations because that's what Canadians are going to want when I argued that there should be no rules or regulations beyond those that apply to growing tomatoes (and even then really..)...

I'm not going to dig it up. If you want to deny it... fine.

More over, allow me to ask you - when was the last time Canada signed a treaty and didn't ratify it ? I'm looking currently... I studied Poly Sci/Econ in school, and I don't recall any examples off the top of my head but memory is far from perfect.
Click to expand...
Dude...no I fucking didn't. I said accept controls...just like smokes,booze and other shit I don't want young kids getting there hands on easily. You can interpret that any fucking way you want, but don't say I said something when I clearly said something else. If you're too lazy to try to prove your claim, it's you who looks the fool.
I have no idea if or when Canada sign a deal and didn't ratify it...what exactly has that got to do with this? Remember Kyoto? Signed, sealed, delivered and IGNORED. You have no more idea what will happen until it does than my dog...I say it's a draw. Interesting that you feel yours should be the only valid opinion on certain issues...
 
OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
VIANARCHRIS said:
Dude...no I fucking didn't. I said accept controls...just like smokes,booze and other shit I don't want young kids getting there hands on easily. You can interpret that any fucking way you want, but don't say I said something when I clearly said something else. If you're too lazy to try to prove your claim, it's you who looks the fool.
I have no idea if or when Canada sign a deal and didn't ratify it...what exactly has that got to do with this? Remember Kyoto? Signed, sealed, delivered and IGNORED. You have no more idea what will happen until it does than my dog...I say it's a draw. Interesting that you feel yours should be the only valid opinion on certain issues...
Click to expand...
Slow your roll buddy.

I'm just gonna move on because you're getting emotional (I guess you're upset I called you on your hypocrisy).
 
radrolley

radrolley

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
I'm not really sold on Trump if that's who you're talking about. I guess I should read his book to see what he's all about, but some things he's said concern me. Not so much racist stuff - I haven't seen that at all (maybe insensitive) - just suggesting the 1st amendment should be put on hold and that Snowden should be executed.

I see the logic in the latter - even if I completely disagree with it. But the former I do not see anything good about. He's concerning for that reason.
Click to expand...
No Golden Dawn is a Fascist party in Greece.

I actually like Trump. At least he's friends with Putin. Cunty Clintons can't even accomplish that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top