So,
What is your point?
Atheists are morally superior?
Wowzers! An actual reply apparently written by a human and at least somewhat relevant to the matter at hand. Mad props! We should have you stuffed.
OTOH, the quality of the reply is, well, lacking.
No, that was not the point, but it may well be true that heathens are morally superior. The point is that it's a a thunderous orgasm of hypocrisy to be going on and on about Jebus and such while also shitting on a, if not THE, primary tenet of the institution. It would be like the head of the DEA cooking speed. There's only so much hypocrisy one can stomach before having to fight off the Family Guy-style projectile vomiting.
As for atheists being morally superior:
1) Why pick out atheists? I've not claimed to be one. There is an ocean of possibilities other than Christianity and atheism.
2) It's a complicated matter. We'd need, for starters, an operational definition of morally superior, and that alone is awfully problematic. Some think it's morally upstanding to join the military; others, like those who rightly claim that unjust war is THE ULTIMATE CRIME, are of an opposite inclination. Some think using cannabis is deathly immoral. And so on.........
3) My experience and that of many others has found heathens to be both intellectually and morally superior to The Flock, and by a wide margin. I've seen Christians do a lot of truly wicked and deplorable things.
4) To be fair, I've seen many Christians who were very kind and busted their asses helping the poor, but all too often it's done as an inroad to add to the flock. Those who truly help the poor with no strings attached good faith are largely assets to our society, but guess what? They are NOT THE FUCKING SUBJECTS OF THIS FUCKING THREAD!