twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
I get a little annoyed at being lumped in the right wing crowd ever since canna informed me I am in the middle actually.
wow, you finally acknowledged it. that only took months. more profiles in courage right here, folks.curiously,you ARE a dirty fucking racist, which is easily demonstrated by examining any of your posts, selected at random.
Bah. All assumptions. We want to trade with dumbest people we can find, not the smartest. It is how you take money from them.An intelligent people are a people worth trading with, and a people determined to trade. They will find others, and others seek them out. If I post the link, it will just get deleted.
It's a quick google search away. Discover magazine is where I found the research, well the article about the research anyway.
Taken from....
http://www.pnas.org/content/108/37/15123.full
actually i have been observing, and yes he does have strong racist tendencies.wow, you finally acknowledged it. that only took months. more profiles in courage right here, folks.
curiously, you and bignbushy also share the same outlook regarding the destructiveness of multiculturalism and likely both cite rushton in your attempts to convince people (not sure if you're trying to convince yourself or others more).
so, have fun knowing that.
Whites dont have the market on viciousness...Bah. All assumptions. We want to trade with dumbest people we can find, not the smartest. It is how you take money from them.
Give up.
They were too smart to trade, so they fought and lost, were enslaved. The story of the world until recently jelled. It is like musical chairs. Arabs and Europeans wanted the Chair called Africa. So, they fought over that. The Africans never stood a chance after the Maxim was invented to sow death.
And even before that it was the Webley Revolver.
Nothing stupid about blacks. Everything vicious about whites.
The USA is not a multicultural country. The USA is a melting pot society.actually i have been observing, and yes he does have strong racist tendencies.
being opposed to a thing for the wrong reasons does not impugn those who are opposed to a thing for the RIGHT reasons.
"Multicultralism" as implemented is only permissive of differing cultures if those cultures are non-european, for european cultures, multiculturalism is quite repressive.
the current form of "Multiculturalism" takes great pains to deny all european virtues, and delights in pointing out european vices and failings, while turning a blind eye to the evil and violence of any society which is sufficiently foreign.
it is not embracing new influences, it is the rejection of MY traditions, and the most successful social forms in history, in favour of celebrating the losers, and creating "Participation Trophies" for the societies which have failed all over the world.
to be truely "MUlticultural" it should embrace ALL social traditions, not just those which are specially selected for their quaintness and backward nature.
It will always be a melting pot.It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Government of Canada to
(a) recognize and promote the understanding that multiculturalism reflects the cultural and racial diversity of Canadian society and acknowledges the freedom of all members of Canadian society to preserve, enhance and share their cultural heritage
(b) recognize and promote the understanding that multiculturalism is a fundamental characteristic of the Canadian heritage and identity and that it provides an invaluable resource in the shaping of Canada’s future
(c) promote the full and equitable participation of individuals and communities of all origins in the continuing evolution and shaping of all aspects of Canadian society and assist them in the elimination of any barrier to that participation
(d) recognize the existence of communities whose members share a common origin and their historic contribution to Canadian society, and enhance their development
(e) ensure that all individuals receive equal treatment and equal protection under the law, while respecting and valuing their diversity
(f) encourage and assist the social, cultural, economic and political institutions of Canada to be both respectful and inclusive of Canada’s multicultural character
(g) promote the understanding and creativity that arise from the interaction between individuals and communities of different origins
(h) foster the recognition and appreciation of the diverse cultures of Canadian society and promote the reflection and the evolving expressions of those cultures
(i) preserve and enhance the use of languages other than English and French, while strengthening the status and use of the official languages of Canada; and
(j) advance multiculturalism throughout Canada in harmony with the national commitment to the official languages of Canada.
I get the feeling that you and I share the same beliefs here.actually i have been observing, and yes he does have strong racist tendencies.
being opposed to a thing for the wrong reasons does not impugn those who are opposed to a thing for the RIGHT reasons.
"Multicultralism" as implemented is only permissive of differing cultures if those cultures are non-european, for european cultures, multiculturalism is quite repressive.
the current form of "Multiculturalism" takes great pains to deny all european virtues, and delights in pointing out european vices and failings, while turning a blind eye to the evil and violence of any society which is sufficiently foreign.
it is not embracing new influences, it is the rejection of MY traditions, and the most successful social forms in history, in favour of celebrating the losers, and creating "Participation Trophies" for the societies which have failed all over the world.
to be truely "MUlticultural" it should embrace ALL social traditions, not just those which are specially selected for their quaintness and backward nature.
* 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_empiresI get the feeling that you and I share the same beliefs here.
Your manifestation of thought comes out as "failed societies" while mine comes out as "peoples of lower intelligence."
(*1) The only society that is pretty much a complete failure, is sub-saharan Africa. There is little evidence of more than just a few cities (great Zimbabwe, Timbuktu, and a couple in Ethiopia come to mind) that were representative of an advanced society, and those flourished for very brief periods of time.
* 2 Advanced societies lasting, and indeed thriving for hundreds or thousands of years are common throughout the rest of the planet, except Antarctica.
I am, however, more of a fan of multiculturalism than you are. There is a lot we can learn from Sub-Saharan Africans. While I recognize those folks are slightly less intelligent on average, they have indeed made valuable contributions to the cultures of other areas when transplanted into them. * 3 They may be incapable of building and sustaining much civilization on their own, but can be valuable members of another on so long as their numbers and level of control within that culture remain rather low.
It's kind of like adding cayenne pepper to, i don't know, potato salad, it's good as long as you don't put too much in.
Repetition is the most effective form of brainwashing.....you already know that....just know everyone else does too.wow, you finally acknowledged it. that only took months. more profiles in courage right here, folks.
curiously, you and bignbushy also share the same outlook regarding the destructiveness of multiculturalism and likely both cite rushton in your attempts to convince people (not sure if you're trying to convince yourself or others more).
so, have fun knowing that.
how can you expect to be taken seriously when you propose Egypt as an example of successful sub Saharan African society?* 1 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_empires
* 2 Egypt?
* 3 That's a terrible comparison. How do you suggest 'controlling' the population of black people? Are there any other races that you would like to systematically control the breeding and migration habits of, or just black people? What should 'society' do if the population of blacks gets too high in a certain area?
It's one thing to suggest these terrible, terrible, ideas, but I want to know how much of a cunt you really are, so I want to know how you'd keep populations in check. How sadistic, cruel, and hateful are you really?
You said;how can you expect to be taken seriously when you propose Egypt as an example of successful sub Saharan African society?
You control it by limiting how many you allow to migrate into your nation.
The only society that is pretty much a complete failure, is sub-saharan Africa.
ohh yes, we totally share the same beliefs...I get the feeling that you and I share the same beliefs here.
ohh. no we dont.Your manifestation of thought comes out as "failed societies" while mine comes out as "peoples of lower intelligence."
not to defend Bigoted 'N' Pushy, but he did say SUB saharan africa, while egypt is clearly above the sahara, and is not now, nor has it ever been negroid, or in any way black african in chracter.You said;
[/B]
The Egyptians had a thriving society for thousands and thousands of years. Egyptian women donned ornate jewelry and wigs, the men boxed, fenced and wrestled for sport and the children played with board games, dolls and other toys.
They invented the calander, the plow, megastructures, and written language to name a few. No big deal though.
Do you propse anything be 'done' about the black/ethnic population that already exists in the USA?
Are you suggesting that white people be allowed to immigrate, but black people aren't?
vous êtes exemplaire est la québécoise?Also, I wanted to note that Canada's multicultural laws also protect cultures that already exist in Canada, e.g. European culture.
One needs look no further than Quebec to see how seriously Canada protects its many diverse cultures.
awwww, little racist says what?Whites dont have the market on viciousness...
actually i have been observing, and yes he does have strong racist tendencies.
being opposed to a thing for the wrong reasons does not impugn those who are opposed to a thing for the RIGHT reasons.
"Multicultralism" as implemented is only permissive of differing cultures if those cultures are non-european, for european cultures, multiculturalism is quite repressive.
the current form of "Multiculturalism" takes great pains to deny all european virtues, and delights in pointing out european vices and failings, while turning a blind eye to the evil and violence of any society which is sufficiently foreign.
it is not embracing new influences, it is the rejection of MY traditions, and the most successful social forms in history, in favour of celebrating the losers, and creating "Participation Trophies" for the societies which have failed all over the world.
to be truely "MUlticultural" it should embrace ALL social traditions, not just those which are specially selected for their quaintness and backward nature.
just like rushton!i think european society and culture is superior