panhead
Well-Known Member
So much unfounded information in this post,let me correct just a few misconceptions you have.i dont understand why everyone wants to use digitals. what is the advantage? for the price of a single digi 1000w ballast you can get almost 3 magnetics. so you can dim the lights, i never understood that if you bought a 1000w dont you want to use all 1000w of the watts you paid for ?!?!?! the power consumption is negligible a valueline 1000w magnetic ballast pulls 5 amps at 240v and a quantum 1000w pulls 4.4-4.5 amps at 240v. you pay 3 times the price for a half amp in power savings?! they also have shorter warranties than magnetic, and heat output difference i have never noticed. you should just get a magnetic and save money. magnetics are also simple to rebuild only 3 main parts, magnet, coil/windings, ignitor. anyway thats my rant lol
First off digital ballasts are not 3 times the price of a mag ballast,the mag ballast you exampled is the lowest priced on the market & the 2 digi ballasts in this thread are both hyped up over priced hydro shop sales technique bullshit ballasts,a kick ass 1,000 watt digi ballast can easily be bought for $40 more than the valueline magnetic,so goes your 3 times the price theory.
Now for energy savings,you obviously are not educated very well on how costly thermal heat transer in electronics is,all the excess heat produced by magnetic ballasts costs money in electric usage,the heat isnt a simple byproduct that costs nothing,every BTU ( british thermal unit ) that electronics put out uses extra electricity to produce that heat,exactly like electric space heaters,the cost savings from digitals would be atleast $20 per 1,000 watts,per month,thats $240 a year per ballast !
There is alot more to this issue than the simple comparing of amperages ,no matter how you slice up the info digis are a far better value on monthly electric costs.