marshal law signs found

jtprin

Well-Known Member
ok, so do you have proof of intention? this is the part I think many of us have a disconnect
It's common sense. If it's well-known by millions of people that all of these things lead to very detrimental effects, why are they all still legal?

And there are many quotes of New World Order and depopulation plans by the same people spotted at Bilderberg Group meetings.
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=a155d113455fac882a3290536575c723

Bill Gates is one of them, his main focus is depopulation through vaccines. Skip to 2:40 for "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!"

And then when you combine this with the countless number of studies that have shown vaccinations cause a variety of very serious, sometimes lethal effects. It's NEVER appropriate to inject mercury, MSG, and aluminum into your body. It's not hard to see what's going on. And keep in mind, this is just one example.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
It's common sense. If it's well-known by millions of people that all of these things lead to very detrimental effects, why are they all still legal?

And there are many quotes of New World Order and depopulation plans by the same people spotted at Bilderberg Group meetings.
Saying it's common sense and it's well-known by millions is not proof. Could you provide actual proof. Some sort of document or video where a government official is actual caught doing such thing, and claiming it as an intentional act. So far your claims are slanderous at best.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=a155d113455fac882a3290536575c723

Bill Gates is one of them, his main focus is depopulation through vaccines. Skip to 2:40 for "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent!"
This is an opinion video. Opinions are like assholes, everyone has one. What I'm looking for here is actual proof.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
I suspect you believe in aliens and/or God.

Not saying that there is something wrong with faith. Heavens no, I have faith. But I have a hard time believing in things that simply do not exist and can be proven. Aliens, God and most conspiracies to name a few.
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Saying it's common sense and it's well-known by millions is not proof. Could you provide actual proof. Some sort of document or video where a government official is actual caught doing such thing, and claiming it as an intentional act. So far your claims are slanderous at best.
http://www.nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/Press%20Release.%20Fluoride.htm - FDA knows about fluoride.
http://www.laleva.org/eng/2009/11/fda_hid_research_damning_to_aspartame.html - FDA knows about aspartame
 

see4

Well-Known Member
You provided two links that refer to citizens requesting a Moratorium on use of Fluoridation, and a opinion write-up on a study of aspartame.

This is not proof that the government is intentionally killing/poisoning people. It, by a stretch, shows the level of incompetence our government has, but that is indicative of having a mostly Republican and Tea-Bagger led congress.
 

guy incognito

Well-Known Member
How is this not actual proof? He SAYS it.
He SAYS what exactly? That we can decelerate the rate of the population growth with improved health care and reproductive services? We can. We need to educate people and provide better reproductive services. It does no good to have 10% more people if those 10% are the ones starving and without access to adequate health care and the marvels of modern medicine, things like vaccines.
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
You provided two links that refer to citizens requesting a Moratorium on use of Fluoridation, and a opinion write-up on a study of aspartame.

This is not proof that the government is intentionally killing/poisoning people. It, by a stretch, shows the level of incompetence our government has, but that is indicative of having a mostly Republican and Tea-Bagger led congress.
All the sources are listed. CLICK ON THEM.
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
He SAYS what exactly? That we can decelerate the rate of the population growth with improved health care and reproductive services? We can. We need to educate people and provide better reproductive services. It does no good to have 10% more people if those 10% are the ones starving and without access to adequate health care and the marvels of modern medicine, things like vaccines.
http://gaia-health.com/gaia-blog/2013-01-13/medical-childrens-psych-journal-wont-retract-fraudulent-paxil-study/
 

see4

Well-Known Member
All the sources are listed. CLICK ON THEM.
Ok, I will see your sources and raise you a, "these do not provide proof that the government is intentionally poisoning the population, at best it shows to what level of incompetence our government is"
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Ok, I will see your sources and raise you a, "these do not provide proof that the government is intentionally poisoning the population, at best it shows to what level of incompetence our government is"
"The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [number of 9 billion] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."

He said those exact words, he was not talking about co2.
 

jtprin

Well-Known Member
Conclusion:

"VAERS is one of the largest databases containing adverse reactions reported in temporal association with vaccination. While some adverse events that are reported to VAERS may be unrelated to the recent vaccination, the VAERS database is an important postmarketing safety surveillance tool that is periodically analyzed by the CDC, FDA, and other vaccine researchers to discover potentially adverse vaccination trends. Using linear regression, several statistically significant trends were derived from the VAERS database: (a) a positive correlation between hospitalization rates and the number of vaccine doses (r[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.91); (b) a negative correlation between hospitalization rates and age (r[SUP]2[/SUP] = 0.95); (c) an increased mortality rate associated with 5&#8211;8 vaccines relative to 1&#8211;4 vaccines; (d) a decreased mortality rate associated with children aged 0.5 to <1 year relative to those aged <0.5 year; and (e) a 1.4 male-to-female infant mortality ratio. These trends not only have a biological plausibility but are supported by evidence from case reports, case series, and other studies using entirely different methodologies and specific population cohorts."
 
Top