Mc Cain & Medical Marijuana? See what he thinks...

ccodiane said:

As loud as you laugh now, , is as loud as you'll cry in less than a month now.....remember that.

Click to expand...

if people like u elect McCain, i will have no choice but to cry. 4 more years of Bush

Of course McCain is going to vote against MM, he needs to back up his buddies wallet. Bush Jr, and Sr are both so deep into perscription drug company stocks its sick.
i dont base my vote for obama solely on that, although i do base part of it on that. the rest comes from me not wanting to fund halliburton (Chaney's wallet) to clean up after an unneccessary war, and all the other get rich scams the republicans have going on the taxpayers. i've had enough.

It sounds to me like most of America is fed up.

VTXDave said:

Disability. That's a government run operation, right?

Click to expand...

That your kind has been cutting! Cheep as usual Dave!

Big P said:

the only good thing about obama is the marijuana issue



we will all be in line for our bread rations but hey!! at least you can smoke in peace





lets let hitler into power, I heard he will let us chew bubblegum in class!!!! yes!!!!!




.

Click to expand...

Are you comparing hitler with Obama?
Shouldn't you be at a McCain event?

They send soldiers over to fight a war for the Bush oil regime. The soldiers come back disabled only to have their disbility either rejected or cut in half. Way to say "thanks for your sacrifice to your country".

As long as Bush oil and Cheney Halliburton are pulling down millions per year, that's all that really matters. Isn't that right?

Obama has clearly stated that he will back the feds of states with MM laws.
You can't go from 0 to 60 in .1, it will be baby steps, but the direction he is taking is bringing us closer to what we are looking for.

misshestermoffitt said:

greed makes the world go 'round

Click to expand...

I know what you mean by this, but consider it this way and it is not such a downer

Greed is what fucks the world up, love is what makes it go around (barely)

ccodiane said:

You go ahead and believe what they tell you to believe......and keep hoping for that change.

Click to expand...

Dude, you are the one with the clown head on!

ccodiane said:

Hello, hello, hello
Is there anybody in there?
Just nod if you can hear me.
Is there anyone at home?

Come on, come on down,
I hear you’re feeling down.
Well I can ease your pain,
Get you on your feet again.

Relax, relax, relax
I need some information first.
Just the basic facts.
Can you show me where it hurts?

Click to expand...

Amazing how NONE of the great music you are 'quoting' seems to have had any impact on you???

ccodiane said:

viable - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

b: capable of existence and development as an independent unit

Viable.

Obama. No.

Coal and crude. Yes.

Class dismissed.

Click to expand...

So we have enough crude oil and coal to make it economically possible to continue to use it as an energy source for the next ten years? What about the continued environmental impact CC? Every time you lose an argument with me you revert to avoiding the original question are you sure you are not a politician?

And since you want to test my knowledge of the english language I thought I would post another definition from the source you quoted.

Viable: capable of working, functioning, or developing adequately <viable alternatives> b: capable of existence and development as an independent unit <the colony is now a viable state> c (1): having a reasonable chance of succeeding <a viable candidate> (2): financially sustainable <a viable enterprise>

Click to expand...

NewGrowth said:

So we have enough crude oil and coal to make it economically possible to continue to use it as an energy source for the next ten years? What about the continued environmental impact CC? Every time you lose an argument with me you revert to avoiding the original question are you sure you are not a politician?

And since you want to test my knowledge of the english language I thought I would post another definition from the source you quoted.

Click to expand...

Hundreds of years, minimum. How long has this stuff been producing itself, naturally?

Honestly, I don't see it as a problem as long as capitalism prevails. Socialism is filthy, my friend.

I'm sure.

Not viable. Obama. Coal and oil. Viable

Are you saying that there is hundred of years of coal and oil to be used?

Sorry but you are incorrect. We've already reached peak oil in a little less than 100 years. Oil and coal aren't formed overnight. I know that being a Palin fan you are cut of the cloth that thinks the Earth is 6000 years old. I hate to break it to you but the Earth is way older than that.

Oil and coal are the remains of animal and plant life that were on this planet back when the dinosaurs roamed the earth. Contrary to creationist belief, dinosaurs went extinct hundreds of millions of years ago. More oil and coal will form in about another hundred million years after humans go extinct. The oil and coal will be what is left of our society but we won't be around to use it.

misshestermoffitt said:

Are you saying that there is hundred of years of coal and oil to be used?

Sorry but you are incorrect. We've already reached peak oil in a little less than 100 years. Oil and coal aren't formed overnight. I know that being a Palin fan you are cut of the cloth that thinks the Earth is 6000 years old. I hate to break it to you but the Earth is way older than that.

Oil and coal are the remains of animal and plant life that were on this planet back when the dinosaurs roamed the earth. Contrary to creationist belief, dinosaurs went extinct hundreds of millions of years ago. More oil and coal will form in about another hundred million years after humans go extinct. The oil and coal will be what is left of our society but we won't be around to use it.

Click to expand...

Absolutely.

"Peak Oil" is a tool of the left. Like most leftist tools, , it's absolutely useless.

4 .5 Billion years old, right? And natural gas, coal, and oil are carbon based and have been being created for billions of years, since life first colonized this planet. Blue green algae, for the most part, for most of the time, right? Great sources of oil, I'm sure.

What we don't know about oils life cycle, we don't want to know. It would conflict with "Peak Oil".

More coal, oil, and natural gas are forming daily, from things that died a long, long, long time ago, Chester.

Coo Coo, you are missing the point. Just because humans are killing off all the other creatures of the earth does not mean those creatures are turning into oil.

Have you ever bought a 2 liter bottle of soda? You can't drink that same bottle of soda for the rest of your life. Eventually that soda runs out. It's kind of like the oil reserves. The aren't just filling back up. Once all the oil is pumped out of an area, that is it, the oil from that area is gone for ever. It may return hundreds of millions of years after we are gone, but you don't have a plant die today and turn to oil tommorrow.

There are old closed down coal mines all over my state. They are closed because all of the usable coal has been mined. No one is checking them daily to see if new coal has sprung up in its place. Those coal mines were the major source of income for my area when I was growing up. By the time I got a drivers license they were shutting down, the mining fun had ended.

ccodiane said:

Hundreds of years, minimum. How long has this stuff been producing itself, naturally?

Honestly, I don't see it as a problem as long as capitalism prevails. Socialism is filthy, my friend.

I'm sure.

Not viable. Obama. Coal and oil. Viable

Click to expand...

I'm putting you in timeout again CC . . . Peak oil is not a tool of the left or the right. Good luck finding another hundred years worth of oil . . ..
How long has it been producing itself naturally?
Well millions of years In fact I stepped on a dinosaur yesterday and it turned into crude oil a few minutes after.

misshestermoffitt said:

Coo Coo, you are missing the point. Just because humans are killing off all the other creatures of the earth does not mean those creatures are turning into oil.

Have you ever bought a 2 liter bottle of soda? You can't drink that same bottle of soda for the rest of your life. Eventually that soda runs out. It's kind of like the oil reserves. The aren't just filling back up. Once all the oil is pumped out of an area, that is it, the oil from that area is gone for ever. It may return hundreds of millions of years after we are gone, but you don't have a plant die today and turn to oil tommorrow.

There are old closed down coal mines all over my state. They are closed because all of the usable coal has been mined. No one is checking them daily to see if new coal has sprung up in its place. Those coal mines were the major source of income for my area when I was growing up. By the time I got a drivers license they were shutting down, the mining fun had ended.

Click to expand...

"....no one is checking them daily...." You are making my morning,lol!!!

It should say 'comic relief' not politics at the forum door!
Thank god we have reached critical mass!

gotta love it!!!

VTXDave said:

Disability. That's a government run operation, right?

Click to expand...

Disability is liberal code for 'early retirement.'

McCain has been consistent on his position on cannabis use in any context. He's against it.

The Chosen One has steadily moved away from a pro-cannabis stance as he has climbed the political ladder. Now saying he will not support Federal prosecution of medical marijuana in MMJ states. It's good, but a far cry from his position when he was running for office in safe Democratic districts. Remove the teleprompter and listen. After you edit out the 'uhs,' 'umms,' and 'hmms', and you are left with a malleable candidate who will abandon a controversial position the minute the waters become treacherous.

If MMJ is the issue, why not support a candidate who is in favor of removing penalties for all cannabis use?

Somebody should tell all these world wide investors, in fuel tankers, to quit wasting their money.......hell, the ones that are being built now won't even be done for a few years!

What a bunch of idiots.


fuel tankers ? News Stories About fuel tankers - Page 1 | Newser: Know More. Search Less.

Pentagon's New Bid Rules Favor Northrop: Boeing

Posted Aug 7, 08 11:41 AM CDT in Business

Excerpt-
(Newser) &#8211; The Pentagon issued new criteria yesterday for the second round of bidding on its lucrative fuel-tanker contract, Bloomberg reports, and Boeing backers immediately cried foul. The new terms give bonus points to a plane that carries more fuel than the earlier guidelines, which Boeing officials and congressional allies claim favors its European-backed rival, Northrop Grumman.

Boeing&#8217;s proposed plane carries 20% less fuel but is significantly cheaper to produce than Northrop's. The bidding on the $35 billion contract was reopened after the GAO backed Boeing's claim that the contract unfairly went to Northrop. The new rules look like "an attempt to justify the original decision," said Rep. Norm Dicks of Washington, saying the revisions favor capacity "larger than any real-world scenarios."




The Battle for Defense Contracts: Boeing's Trouble with Tankers - SPIEGEL ONLINE - News - International


03/12/2008
THE BATTLE FOR DEFENSE CONTRACTS

Boeing's Trouble with Tankers

Excerpt-
Up Against the Hungry Newcomer
Since 2001, Boeing and EADS have competed for tanker contracts in six countries outside the US. EADS has won four of those competitions -- in Britain, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates -- for a total of 25 planes. Boeing has won in Japan and Italy, where it had deep political support thanks to key local contractors, for a total of eight.