Yeah that's logical. Kind of what I was thinking in the back of my mind.
Damn though.. people have to move across the damn state to grow huh?
I have a similar discussion going on in the legalization forum. I actually think that provision is going to eventually be ruled unconstitutional on the basis of equal rights and protections. Not everybody will be able to afford dispensary prices. Growing literally costs just pennies on the dollar. It seems ridiculous to me that you would only extend that privilege and protection to just patients that live on the outskirts of town. That seems like geographical discrimination to me. If your within 25 miles and you grow and get caught. It seems like you would be paying a hefty price based on a technicality. It's about the medicine! You can't force a certain group of patients to buy from a high priced dispensary and allow others to grow their own which is cost effective. I think the first time this is brought before a judge, and appealed. It will eventually be ruled unconstitutional. From what I also know about state initiatives you can't take privileges away, you can only add on.