It's an almost negligible difference if grown correctly, but alas, MH can maximally achieve 90-95% of what HPS will when both are used properly in flowering.
The quality of light from MH surpasses HPS, the intensity of HPS far surpasses MH.
I completely agree flowering with MH is fine, in fact mixing them together(MH+HPS) produces, by far, the best results. Even the sun can not match a high powered(CO2 doping helps) indoor grow.
Awesome thread...fantastic questions...so here is my question.
I have been vegging for 6 weeks under a 400w MH and it's officially time to flower. I have read a lot about the different lights and have heard on many occasions that MH produces a better smoke and HPS produces better yield. Knowing that I was going to be using both...first 2 weeks of flowering with the MH and then 5 weeks of flowering with HPS and then finishing off the grow with another 1-2 weeks of MH. Is this advised or is that a bad idea?
I am not sure what throwing different spectrums at a plant will do...
I know that the plant can tell the difference...
But I am not sure if you would be stressing it or not...
But I can only imagine she will be confused to have "summer light" at the end of it's life, which, theoretically would happen in the fall, with the "warmer" light...
I run a 400w hps light and a 400w mh light for my flowering room. I can honestly say that my buds are higher quality since I switched one of my hps lamps to mh. But I would never flower without an hps lamp.
MH and fluorescent output are quite similar, if you don't have two ballasts to run HPS&MH together, consider HPS with ~6500k fluoros(T5/T8 as side lighting, for instance). Using them as side lighting reduces the distance the light must travel to effectively cover the entire plant by half, which is an effective difference of 4 times(inverse square decay). So this is very efficient use of fluoro lights, and minimally interferes with the over-head HID.