Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013

Genetically Engineered Cannabis yes or no?

  • Total voters
    369
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Yes, for that is it exactly. By the Ganja God, you have it! And if you read the history of these things, these cultural revolutions, that are vicious and bloody. The
very founders of it get plowed under by it.

The worse disaster for mankind so far is Hippies.

Tampering with ecosystem. That would me we understand the ecosystem. We don't.

Therefore we are just as likely to be Gods agent or agents of the Lords of Ganja. Right?

Since we are part of nature then our modifications are therefore actually and factually, entirely natural.

Maybe this is "suppose to happen", yo?
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Yes, for that is it exactly. By the Ganja God, you have it! And if you read the history of these things, these cultural revolutions, that are vicious and bloody. The
very founders of it get plowed under by it.

The worse disaster for mankind so far is Hippies.

Tampering with ecosystem. That would me we understand the ecosystem. We don't.

Therefore we are just as likely to be Gods agent or agents of the Lords of Ganja. Right?

Since we are part of nature then our modifications are therefore actually and factually, entirely natural.

Maybe this is "suppose to happen", yo?
Click to expand...
The beginning of the end of his fail was when he said we're part of nature...

Can't be part of nature and still do "unnatural" things.
 
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
?
"40 Tons of GMO Crops TORCHED in America, Media Blackout"

http://www.newssum.com/40-tons-of-gmo-crops-torched-in-america-media-blackout-147#0evYGK4OcMPWufek.99

(excerpt)
Though the controlled corporate media apparatus is suppressing the story, 40 tons of GMO crops were torched, prompting an FBI investigation. There has been a COMPLETE MEDIA BLACKOUT, outside of local circles has dared to mention it, perhaps because government fears that if the public learns that other people are getting fighting mad (literally), they might join in, and become an actual revolution.


​
 
Antidisestablishmentarian

Antidisestablishmentarian

Well-Known Member
http://www.realfarmacy.com/40-tons-of-gmo-crops-torched-in-america-media-blackout/

That is the original story your link is from. You will see many mistakes in it.

Here is where the story they wrote is coming from:

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2013/06/genetically_engineered_sugar_b.html

There is no media blackout. It's just not national news worthy.

Mistakes:

no such thing as Monsanto protection act

Events took place over two nights not three

headline of news article hid nothing. Headline actually reads: Genetically Engineered Sugar Beets Destroyed in Southern Oregon

Add all that up with the other mistakes you will find, and you have one agenda driven pile of drivel.
 
echelon1k1

echelon1k1

New Member
DNAprotection said:
?
"40 Tons of GMO Crops TORCHED in America, Media Blackout"

http://www.newssum.com/40-tons-of-gmo-crops-torched-in-america-media-blackout-147#0evYGK4OcMPWufek.99

(excerpt)
Though the controlled corporate media apparatus is suppressing the story, 40 tons of GMO crops were torched, prompting an FBI investigation. There has been a COMPLETE MEDIA BLACKOUT, outside of local circles has dared to mention it, perhaps because government fears that if the public learns that other people are getting fighting mad (literally), they might join in, and become an actual revolution.


​
Click to expand...
you keep trying to sensationalise anything and everything, it's fuckers like you that give everyone who is either un-sure and/or against GM crops a bad name.

This is clearly a case of sabotage by either a industry competitor or most probably radical eco-loons...
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
There is something un-natural in the phrase, DNA protection.

The studies of DNA and these techniques are possibly the only way
we can SAVE dna from the "protectors."

Remember, the War Cults are also trying to protect mankind. Not working out so well.
 
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
echelon1k1 said:
you keep trying to sensationalise anything and everything, it's fuckers like you that give everyone who is either un-sure and/or against GM crops a bad name.

This is clearly a case of sabotage by either a industry competitor or most probably radical eco-loons...
Click to expand...
Obviously you have your opinions about me and this overall issue, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are consistent with reality ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT.
With respect to the post you referred to, or any other post written by an outside source, I only bring here what is out there and only for folks to consider, not to "sensationalize" or present as fact/truth etc...there is truth and untruth in everything humans think and believe (and post)...'it is what it is' lol...though I do understand how when someone simply cannot hit or clearly see/understand the correct target they tend to then redirect bullets at the messenger ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT....simply human nature I suppose.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
DNAprotection said:
Obviously you have your opinions about me and this overall issue, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are consistent with reality ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT.
With respect to the post you referred to, or any other post written by an outside source, I only bring here what is out there and only for folks to consider, not to "sensationalize" or present as fact/truth etc...there is truth and untruth in everything humans think and believe (and post)...'it is what it is' lol...though I do understand how when someone simply cannot hit or clearly see/understand the correct target they tend to then redirect bullets at the messenger ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT....simply human nature I suppose.
Click to expand...
We're all well of your agenda, given you're part of the organic movement and all...

Maybe just swallow that organo-cock and choke on it, you'd be saving the world from all the hot air you expel.
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
DNAprotection said:
Obviously you have your opinions about me and this overall issue, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are consistent with reality ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT.
With respect to the post you referred to, or any other post written by an outside source, I only bring here what is out there and only for folks to consider, not to "sensationalize" or present as fact/truth etc...there is truth and untruth in everything humans think and believe (and post)...'it is what it is' lol...though I do understand how when someone simply cannot hit or clearly see/understand the correct target they tend to then redirect bullets at the messenger ie Doer, Frank and the rest of the SHDT....simply human nature I suppose.
Click to expand...
Well, here is why you can't understand. You have core beliefs. You expect these beliefs to be self evident and beyond reproach.

And yet they are only beliefs. We shred all the science and law you provide by going a step farther than you.

We look up the laws and the peer review and read them. You do not.

Very simple, why you are a ball of confusion. You are being fed an agenda and the End, sticking it to the Devil Monsanto, justifies the Means of shutting down a planting season and hurting the farmers and the hungry.

That is your only motive. So it not only sucks as a motive, but has been proved, not only false, but that you won't even accept the hard science that you provide. We shred those papers and you don't believe it. We point out what the law actually says and you don't like it.

That's on you. Not us.
 
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
Well, here is why you can't understand. You have core beliefs. You expect these beliefs to be self evident and beyond reproach.

And yet they are only beliefs. We shred all the science and law you provide by going a step farther than you.

We look up the laws and the peer review and read them. You do not.

Very simple, why you are a ball of confusion. You are being fed an agenda and the End, sticking it to the Devil Monsanto, justifies the Means of shutting down a planting season and hurting the farmers and the hungry.

That is your only motive. So it not only sucks as a motive, but has been proved, not only false, but that you won't even accept the hard science that you provide. We shred those papers and you don't believe it. We point out what the law actually says and you don't like it.

That's on you. Not us.
Click to expand...
The most telling and accurate thing that should be learned from your post here Deer Doer is the simple fact that you don't know me from adam and yet you pretend to know me so as to apparently aid in your efforts to appear 'knowledgeable' (hehe)...this is not unlike your approach, logic and attitude towards Genetic Engineering.
Whenever I bother to read one of the SHDT (RIU sweat hog debate team) posts here (which is seldom), I must admit yours are clearly the most innovative, your teammate Frank usually goes with something more in this vain (but usually not as funny):
;)
[video=youtube;TfMZS__xKzY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfMZS__xKzY[/video]
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
You don't have any more studies.....there are none. Just the few fakes, like 9/11. Same sort of hippy bullshit to me.

You are waving you hands and not addressing the prism of your core believes.

(cn, is there any way to make that prism and prison at the same time?)
 
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
We are all hoping you will leave soon. No one supports your BS, here.
Click to expand...
From this offering one can conclude dear Doer's notion that he speaks for and represents all the diversity of folks here at RIU (not just the SHDT ;)
not at all surprising...
 
DNAprotection

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
You don't have any more studies.....there are none. Just the few fakes, like 9/11. Same sort of hippy bullshit to me.

You are waving you hands and not addressing the prism of your core believes.

(cn, is there any way to make that prism and prison at the same time?)
Click to expand...
Dear Doer, if our differing perspectives of this issue were instead professional rub downs, imo mine would have the best shot at a 'happy ending' based on all available history, info and common sense surrounding this topic, while conversely based on the same criteria imo your logic would almost assuredly end in a 'sad Travolta'...
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
No one here that is a fan of yours, I think.

Just listen to the vast silence. Maybe someone will speak for you. That is how the Royal Navy handled it.

Is there ANY man or boy that will speak for this seaman?...since his Officer will not! (deep scowl)

Someone in the back whispers, soto voce...(the cat's out now, lads)





 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
DNAprotection said:
Dear Doer, if our differing perspectives of this issue were instead professional rub downs, imo mine would have the best shot at a 'happy ending' based on all available history, info and common sense surrounding this topic, while conversely based on the same criteria imo your logic would almost assuredly end in a 'sad Travolta'...
Click to expand...
You are not providing studies, you return to Welcome Back Carter.

It was one of the very first stupidities of your thread here. Good job....Ring around the Rosy, all fall down.

Now you are back to the personal jabs and no facts....still no facts and Monsanto is 3 for 3 and that is just recently.

I don't give a shit about your point of view. No one does.

Give some facts. All you guys say there are all these facts and you are so sad for our ignorance.

But, there are no facts and so ignorance is your point of view.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
DNAprotection said:
Dear Doer, if our differing perspectives of this issue were instead professional rub downs, imo mine would have the best shot at a 'happy ending' based on all available history, info and common sense surrounding this topic, while conversely based on the same criteria imo your logic would almost assuredly end in a 'sad Travolta'...
Click to expand...
Yet you havnt even one conclusive, peer-reviewed source...

Lol, you keep speaking of "facts" and then provide disproven papers written by quacks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top