More Police Brutality

medicineman

New Member
"Most of these cops are high school bullies all growed up ". Amen to that. Problem is you can't kick their asses like you could in H.S. The Bullies I had to deal with, were really a bunch of chickenshit assholes. Once you went off on them they mostly would just curl up into a fetal position. I learned the best punch was the first punch when dealing with bullies. They mostly wouldn't expect it because they were so used to people caving in to their requests. Every once in a while, you'd actually get a tough one that would get in a few good punches, but having learned how to fight early on, I usually prevailed. I hated and still hate fighting. Having to move from school to school made it almost inevitable that I'd end up dealing with school bullies. I'm sure there are a few that remember me.
 

diggitydank420

Well-Known Member
"Most of these cops are high school bullies all growed up ". Amen to that. Problem is you can't kick their asses like you could in H.S. The Bullies I had to deal with, were really a bunch of chickenshit assholes. Once you went off on them they mostly would just curl up into a fetal position. I learned the best punch was the first punch when dealing with bullies. They mostly wouldn't expect it because they were so used to people caving in to their requests. Every once in a while, you'd actually get a tough one that would get in a few good punches, but having learned how to fight early on, I usually prevailed. I hated and still hate fighting. Having to move from school to school made it almost inevitable that I'd end up dealing with school bullies. I'm sure there are a few that remember me.

So true, Medman.

I remember my first encounter with a bully. Sixth grade, waiting for the bus after school. I was horsing around with friends and bumped in to the ubiquitous 15 year old eighth grader. So he pushed me once. I backed away and said there was no problem. Then he pushed me again. Again, I said I didn't have a problem with him.

Then he slapped me. I clocked that fat fucker across the jaw so hard he started crying.
 

medicineman

New Member
So true, Medman.

I remember my first encounter with a bully. Sixth grade, waiting for the bus after school. I was horsing around with friends and bumped in to the ubiquitous 15 year old eighth grader. So he pushed me once. I backed away and said there was no problem. Then he pushed me again. Again, I said I didn't have a problem with him.

Then he slapped me. I clocked that fat fucker across the jaw so hard he started crying.
Yeah it felt good, eh. And did you notice that all of a sudden you had a few new friends. I got to the point I'd just go looking for them to get it over with. I must have attended at least 20 different schools.
 

diggitydank420

Well-Known Member
Yeah it felt good, eh. And did you notice that all of a sudden you had a few new friends. I got to the point I'd just go looking for them to get it over with. I must have attended at least 20 different schools.
Yeah, afterwords, we both found ourselves in the dean's office.

He bitched us out thoroughly and then sent the other guy out first. I thought he was gonna stick it to me for clockin' the guy so hard. But after the bully left the office the dean extended a handshake in my direction while saying "thanks, I wish I could have been the one to do it. Too bad I have to suspend you anyway. Enjoy your 3 days off."
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
Well, I'm not sure what you're disagring with, Max.

1. I said that police brutality is rare.

2. That cops who step over the line should be prosecuted.

As of this date, I cannot believe that the police are the enemy of the people, unless you are talking about the BATF under the Clintoon administration.

BATF = Burn All Toddlers First.

Vi
all the police are tax collectors for the welfare state.they are the enemy of the people and the constitution .
here are you some very powerfull words to remember.if you havnt read this old document in some time.it will send chills up your spine to read it



Wikisource has original text related to this article: United States Declaration of Independence



The Dunlap broadside was the first published version of the Declaration.


The first sentence of the Declaration asserts as a matter of Natural Law the ability of a people to assume political independence, and acknowledges that the grounds for such independence must be reasonable, and therefore explicable, and ought to be explained.
When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
The next section, the famous preamble, includes the ideas and ideals that were principles of the Declaration. It is also an assertion of what is known as the "right of revolution": that is, people have certain rights, and when a government violates these rights, the people have the right to "alter or abolish" that government.[69]
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
The next section is a list of charges against King George which aim to demonstrate that he has violated the colonists' rights and is therefore unfit to be their ruler:
Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offencesFor abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.​
Many Americans still felt a kinship with the people of Great Britain, and had appealed in vain to the prominent among them, as well as to Parliament, to convince the King to relax his more objectionable policies toward the colonies.[70] The next section represents disappointment that these attempts had been unsuccessful.
Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.
In the final section, the signers assert that there exist conditions under which people must change their government, that the British have produced such conditions, and by necessity the colonies must throw off political ties with the British Crown and become independent states. The conclusion incorporates language from Lee's resolution of independence that had been passed on July 2.
We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Max sez ...

"all the police are tax collectors for the welfare state.they are the enemy of the people and the constitution .
here are you some very powerfull words to remember.if you havnt read this old document in some time.it will send chills up your spine to read it"

So, if a driver goes through a school zone at 60mph when children are present and a radar cop writes him/her a ticket, how is the cop an "enemy of the people??

A man literally beats the crap out of his wife, a neighbor calls the police ... and when the police arrive, the man has a hammer and is about to strike the final blow. The cops fire their tazers and the man falls to the ground. The wife's life is saved. How are these cops "enemies of the people?

A carjacker holds up a couple at the point of a shotgun, kicks the driver in the nuts and hits the woman across the nose with the shotgun, splitting her nose in two. An APB goes out on the carjacker. The cops find him. As the carjacker is getting out of the car, he points the shotgun at the cops. The cops make swiss cheese out of the guy and he is killed. How are the cops "enemies of the people?"

And, in your Bill of Rights, Constitutional example ... We have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That would include the right to delegate our authority to government officials, including the cops. What would you suggest ... a return to the Wild West?

Vi

 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
when this country slips into anarchy.i didnt say if.it is when
as poorly as i have been treated by the police in the past.to include violation of my constitutional rights.
and personal witness to many violations of constitutional rights .not only by the police but the the judges and politicians.
when the shit hits the fan the cops might as well paint large red doted targets on their homes and cars.
 

medicineman

New Member
when this country slips into anarchy.i didnt say if.it is when
as poorly as i have been treated by the police in the past.to include violation of my constitutional rights.
and personal witness to many violations of constitutional rights .not only by the police but the the judges and politicians.
when the shit hits the fan the cops might as well paint large red doted targets on their homes and cars.
I couldn't agree more. The cops are the secondary line of defense, after the fact, and only exist to further the rich mans plunder. I am not for anarchy by any means, but the current state of affairs regarding cops is untolerable, Being able to smash in your door and kill your dog and you if you try and defend yourself over some hearsay bullshit is definently untolerable. The myriad of plainsclothes cops are a definent overindulgence of police authority. Uniformed cops can only get away with so much because they stand out in the public eye. Plain clothes cops can literally get away with murder, and do with regularity. Abuse of authority is common place with these plainclothes motherfuckers. My grandad was an ATF bigwig in the Seattle area, 2nd in command when he retired. The audacious crap he got away with is horrific. Rumors have crept back to me that he killed more than one criminal that pissed him off.
 

ViRedd

New Member
"The cops are the secondary line of defense"

So, are you owning up to the fact that the first line of defense ... and offense for that matter, is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY? If so ... its about time!

"and only exist to further the rich mans plunder."

Hahahahaha! What a fucking Marxist!


Vi
 

Farooq87

Active Member
"The cops are the secondary line of defense"

So, are you owning up to the fact that the first line of defense ... and offense for that matter, is PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY? If so ... its about time!

"and only exist to further the rich mans plunder."

Hahahahaha! What a fucking Marxist!


Vi
The first line of defense is prevention, and dealing with the root causes of crime like poverty. Not to mention having better education for the kids, as well as after school programs so kids are not involved in criminal activity when they have nothing to do from 3- 5 when most likely their parents are at their job. You seem like the type that would build more prisons to deal with crime instead of dealing with the real societal problems that we face today.
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
i wonder how many read the declaration of independence.and it has nothing to do with poverty..ill take poor and free over rich and slavery.what you socialist's are going to get is poor and enslaved.

what i was wanting to do was POINT OUT that it is OUR DUTY TO OVER THROW THE GOVERNMENT WHEN IT IS DESTRUCTIVE TO THE PEOPLE AND THEIR FREEDOM.not for some free hand outs..
the cops are the evil villins ...they work for the evil government to steal from the people for their pay masters.the government
this government needs to fall..and soon
 

ilkhan

Well-Known Member
Most "Cops" do not understand constitutional rights they understand regulations and procedure. If they are told by someone in authority that it is OK to shoot someone involved in a fist fight on the prison yard they will do it. The shooting review board and the state of California, can rule it a good shoot. But the feds get it and the officer goes to prison. Not the people who wrote the regulation not the people who told him to do it. I know, this happened were I worked.

Cops don't want to hear about the Constitution or your rights. Because your rights just get in the way of them "preventing crime." I know prison guards (and other law enforcement officers) operate with group think flipped ON.

I was in IST (in service training) and the teacher said that we could be called out by the Governor to "man check-points" in-case of "civil unrest". I couldn't contain myself I said "PFFFT" and everyone looked at me like I was a tool. I said "I ain't manning no God-Damn Check-Point. If their is civil unrest bad enough to need prison guards in the streets its probably because the Government has abandened the Constitution." I said "I will man a check point while looking for an escaped inmate other then that I ain't doin' it." The instructer looked at me (knowingly) and said "I'm just reading the paperwork they gave me."
 

max420thc

Well-Known Member
my declaration says it is my duty to shoot them in the head or blow their balls off.
i just posted it .all anyone has to do is look at it.
scary shit if you are a cop or politician to read these documents i would imagine
 

Sunnysideup

Well-Known Member
I agree with whomever said that cops are tax collectors. They are. I always ask them when I get pulled over..."did you ever think you would grow up to be nothing more than a glorified tax collector?" That always pisses them off!

My husband was a cop for many years. I can honestly say that when he went in he was level headed...he now has a very bad temper. I heard many stories on how he would have to restrain people. It always sounded like over kill to me.....When someone loses a testicle because they were being 'restrained' I think that is over kill. I think a lot of it is because of the nature of their job, it screws them up in the head....They actually believe the force they use is justifiable.
 

stalebiscuit

Well-Known Member
These bastard fucking cops. Somebody should hold their hand down to a solid wood coffee table and break their hands with a heavy-duty hammer. Fuck them!
ya, its not like they get shot at all day and cussed out by douche bags and have to worry about contracting aids or hep C from the blood of a perp and the fact that their families could be on their own after they die

no, they need to have their arms broken as well

sir, seriously, you and everyone else who hates cops for no reason can go fuck themselves. im no cop lover, but to want to break their arms because they represent a soulless authoritative entity (government) who you may or may not agree with
 
Top