Muy's feelgood story of the week

Uncle Ben

Uncle Ben

Well-Known Member
Take a look at Nicaragua, Cuba to see how bad socialism is. It's a no brainer - socialism breeds poverty. Capitalism and the free enterprise system provides the opportunity to breed wealth.

duh....
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
pnwmystery said:
They called themselves Socialists but said that they were not Socialists, but wanted to "reinvent" "redfine" the word Socialism in a more German, National Socialist way. By the way, that's the keyword. Do you know what a keyword is? National Socialism. National Socialism is different from Socialism, just like Democratic Socialism is different from Socialism. Seriously, my friend's 13 year old kid understands these differences and here you are a grown ass man who can't wrap his head around such a simple concept. It's laughable.
Click to expand...
You mean your friend's 13 year old kid has been duped/indoctrinated by liberal asshats that want people to believe that Nazis did ANYTHING resembling what a Conservative would do, rather than what progressives dream of doing. Everything they did is right in line with your political camp's leanings and everything they did is diametrically opposed to my political camp's leanings. Own it, they resemble you and your ilk.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
You mean your friend's 13 year old kid has been duped/indoctrinated by liberal asshats that want people to believe that Nazis did ANYTHING resembling what a Conservative would do, rather than what progressives dream of doing. Everything they did is right in line with your political camp's leanings and everything they did is diametrically opposed to my political camp's leanings. Own it, they resemble you and your ilk.
Click to expand...
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Click to expand...
Lol, because Conservatives are on board with the government having ANYTHING to do with running shit. Your assertion dies before it even gets out of the gate on that critical element. Anyone selling their political agenda wouldn't last a week seeking votes from true Conservatives, whereas they would give Sanders a run for his money among liberals.

Too funny.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Lol, because Conservatives are on board with the government having ANYTHING to do with running shit. Your assertion dies before it even gets out of the gate on that critical element. Anyone selling their political agenda wouldn't last a week seeking votes from true Conservatives, whereas they would give Sanders a run for his money among liberals.

Too funny.
Click to expand...
That's why Donald Trump is winning, huh?

lulz
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Lol. I said Conservatives, not republi-progressives. But, playing along, Trump falls miles behind Sanders in resemblance to the Nazi's political agenda.
Click to expand...
I'd like to have a conversation about political science terminology with someone who doesn't understand the meaning of the words about as much as I'd like to get a root canal after getting a sunburn after a long day of sleeping on a sunny beach

You understand
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I'd like to have a conversation about political science terminology with someone who doesn't understand the meaning of the words about as much as I'd like to get a root canal after getting a sunburn after a long day of sleeping on a sunny beach

You understand
Click to expand...
Sure thing. I'd like to have a conversation with a liberal stooge about how progressive policies have led us right to where we are, about as much as I'd like to have any conversation with a liberal stooge.

You understand.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
rollitup said:
No problem then, Son, just log off!

:mrgreen:
Click to expand...
Oh, you think I post here for the libs? Nothing could be further from the truth. Every lib on here could meet their end, defenseless, in a gun free zone and it would be business as usual for me. There are a couple, whose absence I might notice, but just barely.
 
pnwmystery

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
You mean your friend's 13 year old kid has been duped/indoctrinated by liberal asshats that want people to believe that Nazis did ANYTHING resembling what a Conservative would do, rather than what progressives dream of doing. Everything they did is right in line with your political camp's leanings and everything they did is diametrically opposed to my political camp's leanings. Own it, they resemble you and your ilk.
Click to expand...
So here's a thug that only idiots see: If Nazis are conservatives then today's Conservatives must fall in line with Nazism. Good job on falling into that trap without even me making you fall for it. Of course a lot of the things that modern day conservatives agree with don't fall in line with Nazism; that's why we went to war with them - it didn't even fall in line with American Conservatism. However, there is literally no denying in any way shape form or fact that Nazism does not fall on the right of the political spectrum nor that it is not socially conservative because that's what one of the things Nazis espoused: social conservatism. To argue or say otherwise is an exercise in futility and idiocy.

.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
pnwmystery said:
So here's a thug that only idiots see: If Nazis are conservatives then today's Conservatives must fall in line with Nazism. Good job on falling into that trap without even me making you fall for it. Of course a lot of the things that modern day conservatives agree with don't fall in line with Nazism; that's why we went to war with them - it didn't even fall in line with American Conservatism. However, there is literally no denying in any way shape form or fact that Nazism does not fall on the right of the political spectrum nor that it is not socially conservative because that's what one of the things Nazis espoused: social conservatism. To argue or say otherwise is an exercise in futility and idiocy.

.
Click to expand...
"If Nazis are conservatives then today's Conservatives must fall in line with Nazism"

Except I said the exact opposite, as is fact. Nazis weren't conservative, in fact they were the complete opposite. That might be one of your most ignorant posts to date.

Claiming victory based on the exact OPPOSITE of what I said. Yeah, nice trap. What a maroon.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Lol, because Conservatives are on board with the government having ANYTHING to do with running shit. Your assertion dies before it even gets out of the gate on that critical element.
Click to expand...
so you guys suddenly don't want to monitor every pregnancy in the united states?

LOL
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Nazis weren't conservative, in fact they were the complete opposite.
Click to expand...
so nazis were liberals?

tell me about their liberal policy of exterminating the jews then. that sounds more like something that conservatives would do to mexicans.

hell, you yourself even said we should kill any illegal immigrant who doesn;t flee the nation within 36 hours. i have the quote of it too.

that kinda makes you more like a nazi than anyone else on this forum.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
Oh, you think I post here for the libs? Nothing could be further from the truth. Every lib on here could meet their end, defenseless, in a gun free zone and it would be business as usual for me. There are a couple, whose absence I might notice, but just barely.
Click to expand...
Banning open carry in California.

Back in 1967, says Jacob Sullum at Reason, "the NRA supported the Mulford Act, which banned open carrying of loaded firearms in California. The law, a response to the Black Panthers' conspicuous exercise of the right to armed self-defense, also was supported by Gov. Ronald Reagan." As the bill's conservative sponsor, Don Mulford (R), argued in 1989, "openly carrying a gun is an 'act of violence or near violence,'" Sullum noted. "Apparently Reagan and the NRA agreed." The Mulford Act is still on the books in California, America's most populous state.

. Banning the sale of machine guns and other automatic weapons.

The NRA fondly cites the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 as "the most sweeping rollback of gun control laws in history." And while it did in fact roll back some of the provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act, it also contained a provision — banning the sale of machine guns and other fully automatic weapons to civilians — that came back to haunt the NRA. Robert Spitzer, an expert on gun law, tells NPR that it was "a precedent that would open the door for restricting civilian access to semiautomatic, assault-style weapons." Congress did just that in 1994, thanks — very plausibly — to Ronald Reagan. (See below

3. Mandating background checks for handgun purchases.

In 1991, Reagan supported the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, named for his press secretary shot during the 1981 attempt on Reagan's life. That bill passed in 1993, mandating federal background checks and a five-day waiting period. "Every year, an average of 9,200 Americans are murdered by handguns, according to Department of Justice statistics," Reagan wrote in a 1991 op-ed for The New York Times. "This does not include suicides or the tens of thousands of robberies, rapes, and assaults committed with handguns. This level of violence must be stopped."

committed with handguns. This level of violence must be stopped."

4. Banning assault weapons.

Despite the law being enacted well after his presidency, Reagan was credited with playing a critical role in the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which has since expired. Reagan's personal and effective lobbying helped the bill overcome the strong objections of the NRA. "The vote on the assault weapon ban was contentious and barely passed the House of Representatives," notes Andrew Kaczynski. "At least two members of the House of Representatives credited Reagan with influencing their votes. The bill passed 216-214, a margin of two votes."
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Banning open carry in California.

Back in 1967, says Jacob Sullum at Reason, "the NRA supported the Mulford Act, which banned open carrying of loaded firearms in California. The law, a response to the Black Panthers' conspicuous exercise of the right to armed self-defense, also was supported by Gov. Ronald Reagan." As the bill's conservative sponsor, Don Mulford (R), argued in 1989, "openly carrying a gun is an 'act of violence or near violence,'" Sullum noted. "Apparently Reagan and the NRA agreed." The Mulford Act is still on the books in California, America's most populous state.

. Banning the sale of machine guns and other automatic weapons.

The NRA fondly cites the Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986 as "the most sweeping rollback of gun control laws in history." And while it did in fact roll back some of the provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act, it also contained a provision — banning the sale of machine guns and other fully automatic weapons to civilians — that came back to haunt the NRA. Robert Spitzer, an expert on gun law, tells NPR that it was "a precedent that would open the door for restricting civilian access to semiautomatic, assault-style weapons." Congress did just that in 1994, thanks — very plausibly — to Ronald Reagan. (See below

3. Mandating background checks for handgun purchases.

In 1991, Reagan supported the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, named for his press secretary shot during the 1981 attempt on Reagan's life. That bill passed in 1993, mandating federal background checks and a five-day waiting period. "Every year, an average of 9,200 Americans are murdered by handguns, according to Department of Justice statistics," Reagan wrote in a 1991 op-ed for The New York Times. "This does not include suicides or the tens of thousands of robberies, rapes, and assaults committed with handguns. This level of violence must be stopped."

committed with handguns. This level of violence must be stopped."

4. Banning assault weapons.

Despite the law being enacted well after his presidency, Reagan was credited with playing a critical role in the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which has since expired. Reagan's personal and effective lobbying helped the bill overcome the strong objections of the NRA. "The vote on the assault weapon ban was contentious and barely passed the House of Representatives," notes Andrew Kaczynski. "At least two members of the House of Representatives credited Reagan with influencing their votes. The bill passed 216-214, a margin of two votes."
Click to expand...
Oh, I get it, you think Reagan was a Conservative. Sorry you went to all that highlighting trouble.
 
pnwmystery

pnwmystery

Well-Known Member
MuyLocoNC said:
"If Nazis are conservatives then today's Conservatives must fall in line with Nazism"

Except I said the exact opposite, as is fact. Nazis weren't conservative, in fact they were the complete opposite. That might be one of your most ignorant posts to date.

Claiming victory based on the exact OPPOSITE of what I said. Yeah, nice trap. What a maroon.
Click to expand...
No you fucking moron you assumed that because I said Nazis were Conservatives that it must fall in line with modern American Conservativism.
 
MuyLocoNC

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
pnwmystery said:
No you fucking moron you assumed that because I said Nazis were Conservatives that it must fall in line with modern American Conservativism.
Click to expand...
No, I didn't. Modern Conservative is exactly what I was talking about, I don't care what you tried to change the subject into. Nazis' political leanings were undeniably more in line with today's liberal/progressive/statist and just about the complete opposite of any Constitutional Conservative. That's the only point I was making and it's undeniable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top