my puppy likes dope

just gave her like .5 gram of wet weed she should be fine, she chillin right now hoping she will sleep good :)
 
So does mine. He ate a weed chocolate bar and had to go to the doggy er (hes a 5lb Chihuahua) He also drank a glass of gin and tonic during christmas last year when a family member left it on the ground. Just recently he ate some spice off the table(Fake weed stuff) and was high as balls
 
Lawpb said:
So does mine. He ate a weed chocolate bar and had to go to the doggy er (hes a 5lb Chihuahua) He also drank a glass of gin and tonic during christmas last year when a family member left it on the ground. Just recently he ate some spice off the table(Fake weed stuff) and was high as balls
Click to expand...

was probally the chocolate bar that fucked him up, chocolate is a poison to dogs or not good for them or something, i know your not supposed to let them have it.
 
you no what i hate....people who call weed "dope".....if you want some dope, i can show you dope........dope is a totally different drug......

like when people who dont smoke call me a dope head......hummm, no.....feel free to call me a pot head all day long...but if their is one thing i am not sir, it is a dope head
 
The*Mad*Hatter said:
you no what i hate....people who call weed "dope"
Click to expand...

Do you know what I hate? People who do not know when to use the word know instead of the word "no."

If you have any question on whether or not you need reply to the above, the answer is, "no," you don't need to.
 
The*Mad*Hatter said:
you no what i hate....people who call weed "dope".....if you want some dope, i can show you dope........dope is a totally different drug......

like when people who dont smoke call me a dope head......hummm, no.....feel free to call me a pot head all day long...but if their is one thing i am not sir, it is a dope head
Click to expand...

I hate when people call weed "dope" and their boy "my dealer". Also, my dog loves stems and stalks.
 
The*Mad*Hatter said:
you no what i hate....people who call weed "dope".....if you want some dope, i can show you dope........dope is a totally different drug......

like when people who dont smoke call me a dope head......hummm, no.....feel free to call me a pot head all day long...but if their is one thing i am not sir, it is a dope head
Click to expand...

i guess that all depends where you grew up, where im frome dope is pot....... i see what your saying too tho. but you shouldnt hate on people because thier slang has a different meaning where they grew up then it dis where you grew up......
 
Brick Top said:
Do you know what I hate? People who do not know when to use the word know instead of the word "no."

If you have any question on whether or not you need reply to the above, the answer is, "no," you don't need to.
Click to expand...


DUDE!!!!! you corrected my spelling errors!!!!! Thanks a bunch mr.brown....im on to 3rd period now!!!!

can you do me a solid and check up on me and all my post's....i make alot of spelling errors and i need a grown up to help me get threw the day
 
matthebrute said:
i guess that all depends where you grew up, where im frome dope is pot....... i see what your saying too tho. but you shouldnt hate on people because thier slang has a different meaning where they grew up then it dis where you grew up......
Click to expand...


Not only can it be a regional thing, it can also be a generational thing. When I started getting high in the 60's and well into the 70's the most commonly used term for pot was dope. When I would go to places like Florida, California, Louisiana, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, Michigan, and others, and met other 'freaks,' most would call pot dope. When I spent a summer in Greece visiting my cousin who was in the Navy and stationed in Greece, my cousin and his friends mostly called pot dope. When I went to college and was surrounded by people from just about every State in the nation, all of them that I knew would call pot dope more than they called it anything else. Its just how things were back in the olden days. Once someone gets used to a certain name, a certain term, that is normal, that is widely accepted in their area or in their era, they will likely always mainly refer to pot using that term.

Just because someone else came from a place or time where pot was not called dope, or not called dope as much as it was called by some other name, or if they just prefer a different name because of the negative connotation that goes with the term dope, that does not make someone else who calls pot dope wrong for calling pot dope, and no one should be chastised by anyone for having done so.
 
Brick Top said:
Do you know what I hate? People who do not know when to use the word know instead of the word "no."

If you have any question on whether or not you need reply to the above, the answer is, "no," you don't need to.
Click to expand...

The grammar police huh? You know what I hate? I hate condescending sticklers.

That's funny as the guy who said.....From: BrickTop "Not when it conflicts with what other soil biologists say. " as a answer to my question and then proceeded to follow it up with ONE soil biologist to back up your claim. You yourself make mistakes too! Don't act like your the greatest thing since sliced bread bro.

Step off your high horse. Your words are not gospel as you think, they are arrogant. You maybe well respected, but you show a lack of respect to the community here.

And by the way I see you didn't continue to defend your answers when I called your bullshit in the molasses thread. Seems you actually backed down. Wow! Impressive!
 
these times they are ah changin!!!!!
its not the 60's anymore.....dope is, meth, ice, rock............
i understand that you may have grown up around the time age were "dope" actually was marijuana....
but it can become very easily missunderstood if you was to ask a dealer for some dope...you might not get what you asked for
 
The*Mad*Hatter said:
DUDE!!!!! you corrected my spelling errors!!!!!
Click to expand...

"No," I did not correct your spelling errors. You spelled "no" correctly. I merely pointed out how you exhibited your ignorance with the misuse of the word "no" when the word know should have been used in it's place.

Ironically, it happened when you were referring to the word "dope."

I find that exceedingly amusing!
 
T Ray said:
That's funny as the guy who said.....From: BrickTop "Not when it conflicts with what other soil biologists say. " as a answer to my question and then proceeded to follow it up with ONE soil biologist to back up your claim.
Click to expand...

If you need more sources to counter what your source claimed, I can supply them. I just saw no need to send multiple bits of information when my point was that what your source claimed is not an accepted fact and that others in the same field say the total opposite of what your source claimed.

I already knew what other soil microbiologists say. Along with four family members I am an owner of a nursery (trees and bushes, not plants or dirty diaper kids), so knowing that sort of thing is somewhat important to the operation of our business. I do not work at the nursery, I retired seven years ago, close to eight years now actually, I am only a financial partner in the business, but I am kept abreast of things and I have learned much over the years from my four family members, all degreed graduates of the NC State School of Agriculture.


Additional:

What your source said is, in a way, correct. Just not how it was so generally stated and in what you claim it means.

Extremely large amounts of chemical fertilizers will kill microbes in the soil. But in that heavy of a dose the fertilizer would kill plants, so at that point the microbes become academic. Chemical fertilizers can also kill microbes in soil after many years of heavy feedings and a large buildup occurs.

What makes your position totally untenable is when talking about growing in pots. People do not reuse the same soil over and over and over again and while doing so allow a massive buildup of salts that would kill microbes in the soil. Most growers start each crop in fresh soil. The only way to kill the microbes with chemical fertilizer in fresh soil would be to use such a heavy amount that it would also kill the plants. I am sure that happens by accident now and then, but again, at that point the microbes in the soil have become irrelevant. Who needs living microbes for dead plants?

You applied a set of conditions to a situation where it did not apply. You took a broad general statement, that lacked definition and explanation that would tell readers how and where it would be applicable, that would be true under certain conditions, mainly outdoors, in soil, in lawns, in gardens, in farmers fields, where yearly heavy feedings of chemical fertilizers can be common and wrongly attempted to make it fit any and all situations, even though that is utterly impossible.

That is what made your position completely untenable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top