If somebody buys a gun to protect themselves from an extremely rare event, while in doing so, making this kind of attack all too common then yes, they are a coward. Trading a sense of security for the certainty of mass murder is cowardly.
Lol. No, I don't think gay people see straight couples and think, oh disgusting she's probably going to suck his dick later.
They were safe bets, similar to what investigators do while sifting through the evidence available at the time.Yes, you must be feeling especially stupid and tired after jumping to all the conclusions you did.
The white terrorist had about 20 guns on him. He was part of the 3% of the population that owns 98% of all guns in america, shit for brains.
16 in the hotel room, 'not all of which were fully automatic weapons'
I already said why, idiot. Go back and sound out the words.
investigators wait on evidence, not making "safe bets" on what happened. You didn't even have any evidence before you shot off your mouth. Good thing you don't put your money where your mouth is or you'd be broke.
Thanks, I'll just assume you're stupid, that's a safe bet.
No, you support slavery if you associate with southern, white, Christian conservatives.
You are a funny fucker. I like you.
Gun nuts lobby for laws that allow Americans the guns and mags that they need for massacres, rather than self defense, hunting, or any other legitimate use a gun or guns has.
I'm all for guns. Any and all guns for civilian use.16 in the hotel room, 'not all of which were fully automatic weapons'
And another 18 at home...
There are platoons in Afghanistan that aren't so well equipped, FFS.
*applauds*
And that's exactly my point. At what level does this stop being about Second Amendment rights and start being about offensive capability?
