NO! On Prop 19

luvourmother

Active Member
When he added the 25 sq. ft limit and the minimum 21 age limit, he doomed his investment to failure.

Opening the option for each jurisdiction to write its own ordinances nailed the coffin shut.

Forgetting to exempt MMJ grows and patients from those rules will cause the remains to be dug up, and burned in effigy.

No on P19.
according to you, which fortunately for the rest of us is a minority pov.
also, medical marijuana is exempt from prop 19, get that through your thick skull please.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
There are three in my household.

Fuck P19.
I will admit it will be hard for you to support a 3oz/day (or was it 3oz/week) habit on 25sf. Of course, you are a 215 patient, so it won't affect you anyway, so vote no on P19 to deny your neighbors the right to grow their own.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
I will admit it will be hard for you to support a 3oz/day (or was it 3oz/week) habit on 25sf. Of course, you are a 215 patient, so it won't affect you anyway, so vote no on P19 to deny your neighbors the right to grow their own.

so i will ask you, ... what if 4 smokers/growers live at the same house? how can you support your needs with only 6.25 square feet?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
so i will ask you, ... what if 4 smokers/growers live at the same house? how can you support your needs with only 6.25 square feet?
Better than they can now with 0.0sf.

Maybe they will buy from you. You're not opposed to that, are you?
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
Better than they can now with 0.0sf.

Maybe they will buy from you. You're not opposed to that, are you?
so you just keep spinning your answer back to attempts at insults directed at me.

i don't get it.

do you have an honest opinion, or are you simply here to bash people?


25 square feet per HOUSEHOLD is ridiculous. whether it a "start" or not. would it really be so hard to admit this?
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
so you just keep spinning your answer back to attempts at insults directed at me.

i don't get it.

do you have an honest opinion, or are you simply here to bash people?


25 square feet per HOUSEHOLD is ridiculous. whether it a "start" or not. would it really be so hard to admit this?
I would like to see a bigger grow area allowed, but would the average voter in CA go along with that? Probably not.

25sf is better than 0.0sf. Making it legal removes the probably cause excuses for authorities to kick your door down and shoot your dog, and grandmother. That is a BIG improvement.

Don't be so sensitive, FDD. I am not here to bash you. I don't even know you. You actually sound like a pretty nice guy and somebody I would like to have as a neighbbor.
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
I would like to see a bigger grow area allowed, but would the average voter in CA go along with that? Probably not.

25sf is better than 0.0sf. Making it legal removes the probably cause excuses for authorities to kick your door down and shoot your dog, and grandmother. That is a BIG improvement.

Don't be so sensitive, FDD. I am not here to bash you. I don't even know you. You actually sound like a pretty nice guy and somebody I would like to have as a neighbbor.
i'm not being sensitive. just wondering why people feel they need to add insults to opinions. everytime someone says No they get called a drug dealer. what does that prove? you insinuated it, i addressed it. no need to call me sensitive, we are debating aren't we?

just another insult i assume.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
i'm not being sensitive. just wondering why people feel they need to add insults to opinions. everytime someone says No they get called a drug dealer. what does that prove? you insinuated it, i addressed it. no need to call me sensitive, we are debating aren't we?

just another insult i assume.
No insult intended. Hey, I said I would like to have you as a neighbor, didn't I? That is a compliment.
 

biroboosh

Member
i wish my state, MI would get a move on already. so many city wide improvements could be made, and our streets are only trying to move towards a safer atmosphere where you can obtain quality herbs without having to make a shady transaction at a parking lot or deal with non-regulated providers. think about it, legalize it, tax it, and let new large scale companies who have the know how and resources to grow top quality meds cash in on this could be booming industry.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
if you lived with 3 other smokers/growers you would not get 25sqf, you'd get 6.25. :wall:
I agree. That is the way I read P19 as well. One 25sf grow per residence. From what I read here, one could expect about 1 pound every three months on 25 sf. Personally, I could not smoke a pound in a hundred years, but I realize that many of you think 25sf is too small. I would like to see the grow area bigger. Still, 25sf is more than 0.0sf, and 25sf is the minimum and could be expanded by local authorities or even by the state legislature. The ability to legally grow on 25sf solves a bunch of other problems related to "probable cause" as well.

P19 ain't perfect, but it is a start.
 

yeson19

Member
http://stash.norml.org/californias-prop-19-a-word-for-word-analysis

"A city might decide you are allowed to grow more than a 5′x5′ garden and possess more than an ounce for personal consumption. And maybe they decide you can buy and sell more than an ounce at a time. Hooray!"

"
And even if you don’t follow the law perfectly, who’s to know? If you’re pulled over and there’s an ounce and a half in your backpack, how does that cop know? Does it “smell heavy” in your car? So long as you refuse a search, how will he know? The smell of pot isn’t cause for a search; you’re allowed to have an ounce of it.
If you have a 10′x10′ garden, who’s to know? Is the electric bill that much higher? Does the garden smell more (probably not at all if you build a good grow room)? Plus don’t forget that you’re allowed to have more than one ounce, namely, any amount that you grow within your 5′x5′ garden, at the location of the garden. I think by the time law enforcement came back with a warrant to investigate how big my garden is, three-fourths of it would be cut down and I would suddenly have my 5′x5′ garden and my hanging plants from the last 5′x5′ area I harvested."
 

Serapis

Well-Known Member
so you just keep spinning your answer back to attempts at insults directed at me.

i don't get it.

do you have an honest opinion, or are you simply here to bash people?


25 square feet per HOUSEHOLD is ridiculous. whether it a "start" or not. would it really be so hard to admit this?
I have a 4' x 4' secret Jardin with a 600w light and I'm estatic about having it. I love the hobby and the yields. The problem is, my state doesn't even recognize marijuana as having medical benefits. I use only 16' sqaure and it is more than enough for me and my friends. Do you realize what a 4'x4' or a 5'x5' scrog will produce? It won't produce the hundreds of pounds that your outdoor grows do, but I'd love to have a legal 5'x5'. You can easily pull a pound every 5-6 weeks if you work it right.

Look at it this way, a 5' x 5' garden is certainly bigger than a 0' x 0' garden. Don't mention 215 sizes in rebuttal, as they aren't the same thing. I grow for me and two others. We aren't able to smoke 16 ounces in 6 weeks. An ounce lasts me two weeks. What do you think is an appropriate sized garden for recreational use?
 

poke smot420

Well-Known Member
what do you tell the inmates in prison for pot? what about medical patients? what about the feds suing CA? what about the rise in trafficking out of CA to other states? its causes more problems then it solves. plus it puts small/medium growers such as myself out of work. vote no on that shit. i agree with fdd2blk 100%. small towns in humboldt, hayfork, crescent city etc will cease to exsist
 
Top