erkelsgoo420
New Member
Lol. I meant ebb and flow not dwc... Noobishness
very good point. The number of plants seems to be where the yield comes in.Obviously this is an amazing setup. So, what can we learn from this.
1) Growing large numbers of very small plants is optimal.
2) Cannabis probably grows well with 2,500 Lumens / square foot.
3) Growing along the natural sphere of light emitted by a bulb is good.
4) It is hard to do #3 on a flat surface.
5) Allowing light to scatter naturally while surrounded by plants has the same area coverage as multiple lights.
The main drawback of this design, and it is pretty damn monumental, is that the guy has over 200 plants which IIRC is punishable by at least 5 years in Federal prison. And I do believe large numbers of small plants is 75% of the reason for the great yield in these setups.
Using fewer larger plants, this system probably wouldn't be nearly as productive. But, there may be ways to carry some of these concepts over to such a setup.
LOL you sound lazy, dirt is easier to work with then hydro. did you just complain about watering by hand? lol that makes no sense, thats the only bond you have with you plant is watering it get out of here with that negative shit.looks like a lot of work - watering by hand? yuck!!! a lot of dirt to get rid of - hardly the best use of the light - but if you h ave nothing better to do then hunch over for hours at a time then woooo whoooooo have at it