Weedoozie
Well-Known Member
Growone is correct in the statement that many medical patients need more than what the initiative will allow for personal consumption. Many medical users use 1 oz of cannabis within a few days to 1 week. Only allowing 1 grow area of 5x5 per private property is absolutely not enough for those in medical need. As a medical patient, if the bill passes, I could grow only a portion of what is necessary for my medical needs. I would be forced to go out and spend insane amounts out of pocket for the varying qualities of large scale produced cannabis that would be available. My rights as a medical marijuana patient currently are much better than they would be after the proposed initiative because there is no limit to the amount of medicine a patient can have for personal comsumption now. The California Supreme court ruled that it is unconstitutional to put a limit on the amount of medicine a patient needs, therefore, at this time, there is no cap on the amount of plants or dried cannabis a patient can have. Though the laws on possession for a patient vary from county to county, this current system is much better for the citizens of this country who actually NEED cannabis.Shit... that's more than enough for one smoker. What's the problem (as long as you're not looking to make a business out of it)?
You've got it so good right now unlike us here in Europe. I could not vote no to a deal like this. I mean how many people in California wanna grow just for themselves compared to those who wanna grow larger amounts for other people? Any idea on the ratio?
This prop 19 is meant to control, regulate, and tax cannabis for the general public, the recureational users. It is not written to benefit patients at all, it actually moreso limits our rights which is enthically inconsistent.