Obama administration's war on women
- Thread starter Johnny Retro
- Start date
bostoner
Active Member
Oh. Well the previous cut made of the aforementioned act was not made to fund this student loans thing which I'm for. It was to secure tax breaks previously budgeted for everyone among other things I'm not familiar with. Something that sounds pretty republican friendly to me. The way the democrats want to fund this student costs cap is the way I said before, use some defense money.
Mitt Romney "I wanted to increase the work requirement, (wack. since when are you federally required to work?) ... I said, for instance, that even if you have a child 2 years of age, you need to go to work. (again NEED to go to work and 2??) And people said, 'Well that's heartless.'(because it is you weirdo) And I said, 'No, no, I'm willing to spend more giving day care to allow those parents to go back to work. (Wheres this money coming from?) It'll cost the state more providing that daycare, but I want the individuals to have the dignity of work.'" (working and dignity, most the places I've worked in the past made you wear a dumb little hat that took all my dignity away right there.).
We all know he's talking about women and this is the recovery of the original statement he got a lot of flack for. This guy is either nuts or a moron.
DelSlow
Well-Known Member
violence against women is bad, unless you are a lesbian, native american or immigrant. in which case, drop dead, bitch.
This one has to be a joke.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
nope.
"Republicans want to lower the number of visas permitted in the bill to illegal immigrants who report domestic violence. They also want to drop references to gays and lesbians in the bill and get rid of a provision dealing with domestic abuse prosecutions of non-Native Americans on tribal lands"
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-04-26/politics/politics_senate-domestic-abuse_1_senate-republicans-domestic-violence-domestic-abuse?_s=PM
OLITICS
abandonconflict
Well-Known Member
At least Viagra is covered.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
let's go kill some abortion providers!
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation,House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.
"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers."
The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state's legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person "while resisting an attempt to harm" that person's unborn child or the unborn child of that person's spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation,House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.
"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers."
The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state's legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person "while resisting an attempt to harm" that person's unborn child or the unborn child of that person's spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.
DelSlow
Well-Known Member
nope.
"Republicans want to lower the number of visas permitted in the bill to illegal immigrants who report domestic violence. They also want to drop references to gays and lesbians in the bill and get rid of a provision dealing with domestic abuse prosecutions of non-Native Americans on tribal lands"
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-04-26/politics/politics_senate-domestic-abuse_1_senate-republicans-domestic-violence-domestic-abuse?_s=PM
Don't you just love the GOP? lol
