obama has taken less vacation in his entire presidency...

R

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
You can move to moon. Politics is not all about money over there. On the moon you can have your instant polling approval scam, to see how to decide on money.....until someone else shows up. Then it will be all about money and not about approval scams.
Click to expand...
Good point... i was thinking more of a history exam, you know, just to make sure they understand why they occupy the positions they attain, why those positions even exist, and what they're actually supposed to be doing in those positions. Bottom line: we need a way to keep them honest.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
god1 said:
Okay here's the problem, we aren't all math majors;
So, here’s your opportunity to put all these naysayers to bed;

You’re a math major, so start by giving this audience the definition, (in math terms), of the federal “deficit” and “debt”, and then describe how the “slopes” of the functions correlate.

You can use google if need be, but for a “math” major this ought to be “easy peasy”.

Then calculate the rate of change for the deficit, that would be required for the "Magic Negro" to get neutral on the debt in the time he has left.

I'm being an Ass, but so are you! At least I will admit it!

(And you don't need that little pink calculator)
Click to expand...
Bah that's easy, all we need is lots of inflation coupled with ultra low interest rates giving us essentially what would be NEGATIVE interest rates, which would enable the government to borrow infinite sums of money and just roll them over an infinite amount of times, creating a 89.9 degree hockey stick debt accumulation, but it wouldn't matter because we could just use the infinite credit cards we get in the mail to pay off all the other credit cards we maxxed out.

What could possibly go wrong?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
Glaucoma said:
Uhhh.. ok? I move to moon!

No wonder you got a Buck like. You took a simple, open idea and turned it into 'instant polling scams'.
Click to expand...
It is mob rule, instant democracy. That is a scam. Why? Because instant polling is anti-constituitional. It is a scam and would be instantly manipulated and you would be the first to choke on your own words.

This is a Federation of States, each with bi-cameral, tri-branched govt, not Parliamentary rules.

We are set up so that instant mobs cannot pull down the elected, even if they "don't like them."

Why not just become familiar with what does happen and why. We don't need a fix, we need you to pay more attention.

Have you never gotten a Buck-like, highly valued,indeed?. No, Of course not. Pay attention to reality and not the Buck?
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
reasonevangelist said:
Good point... i was thinking more of a history exam, you know, just to make sure they understand why they occupy the positions they attain, why those positions even exist, and what they're actually supposed to be doing in those positions. Bottom line: we need a way to keep them honest.
Click to expand...
You are pissing on a straw dog. You are making the giant assumption that 500 elected citizens are not competent. Yet they were elected from over 200 million voters. WE already SAID they were competent, but you want to add a "means test." Not Lawful in this great land.

You need to review the civics. I doubr that you could pass the test you propose. Yet, if you could, they could. You don't understand the hidden processes by which you even get elected. Most have College Degrees So, only your straw dog is would be unable to pass any test that would stand to measure.

How about a Bar Exam? That is a complete test of THINKING. Most are lawyers and most have raised themselves into this dangerous and thankless calling, though the dual selection of brainy and tough.

Only the Press points out the usual human stuff we all do, verbal gaffs mostly, and calls that WRONG. And you know how oxymoronic the entire concept of a "journalist degree" even is, right?

It is the lie for a living degree, just like LAW.

Grip up, swing more smoothly?

To say they need a test? You need a test. :)
 
R

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
You are pissing on a straw dog. You are making the giant assumption that 500 elected citizens are not competent. Yet they were elected from over 200 million voters. WE already SAID they were competent, but you want to add a "means test." Not Lawful in this great land.

You need to review the civics. I doubr that you could pass the test you propose. Yet, if you could, they could. You don't understand the hidden processes by which you even get elected. Most have College Degrees So, only your straw dog is would be unable to pass any test that would stand to measure.

How about a Bar Exam? That is a complete test of THINKING. Most are lawyers and most have raised themselves into this dangerous and thankless calling, though the dual selection of brainy and tough.

Only the Press points out the usual human stuff we all do, verbal gaffs mostly, and calls that WRONG. And you know how oxymoronic the entire concept of a "journalist degree" even is, right?

It is the lie for a living degree, just like LAW.

Grip up, swing more smoothly?

To say they need a test? You need a test. :)
Click to expand...
"Bottom line: we need to keep them Honest."

Nothing to do with competence. ;)

(in fact, this goes back to my opposition to the apparent widespread adoption of "hanlon's razor;" you have to be competent to feign incompetence; the incompetent would never feign malice ^^)
 
Doer

Doer

Well-Known Member
reasonevangelist said:
"Bottom line: we need to keep them Honest."

Nothing to do with competence. ;)

(in fact, this goes back to my opposition to the apparent widespread adoption of "hanlon's razor;" you have to be competent to feign incompetence; the incompetent would never feign malice ^^)
Click to expand...
The job is about trading markers for money, for your constitutes.
You have to play a game of trades. Your support of something vs others' support for you later, vs your Party leader's intentions and what it may cost you in trades to go along or not, is the GAME.

It is all completely honest and has real consequences, including a bullet in the head.

So, the idea that it should be another way, is the way of a Constitutional Amendment, only.

Good luck. :)
 
R

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
Doer said:
The job is about trading markers for money, for your constitutes.
You have to play a game of trades. Your support of something vs others' support for you later, vs your Party leader's intentions and what it may cost you in trades to go along or not, is the GAME.

It is all completely honest and has real consequences, including a bullet in the head.

So, the idea that it should be another way, is the way of a Constitutional Amendment, only.

Good luck. :)
Click to expand...
I suppose death is about as honest as it gets. I'm actually kinda lookin' forward to it.
 
Meowlistenhere

Meowlistenhere

Active Member
UncleBuck said:
fact check says nothing about the deficit, and the other highly biased website claims obama owns the 2009 budget, which is impossible since he wasn't even in office until AFTER 2009 started, ya fucking idiot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_Individual_Freedom

they sent about $4 million to support republican candidates in 2010 and 2012. try to find a neutral, unbiased source making your idiotic claim. you won't find it, because your claim has no basis in fact whatsoever.
Click to expand...
This man is and will go down as the worst, most damaging president we have EVER had in the entire history of our country. Why and how you can continue to defend this guy is beyond me. Unless you truly hate our country. Arguing with you is pointless. Even if you know people are right, you will argue regardless. I don't need to point shit out or prove anything anymore about this guy. He's burying himself in front of the whole world on a weekly basis, and will continue to do so. Puppet or no puppet.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Meowlistenhere said:
This man is and will go down as the worst, most damaging president we have EVER had in the entire history of our country. Why and how you can continue to defend this guy is beyond me. Unless you truly hate our country. Arguing with you is pointless. Even if you know people are right, you will argue regardless. I don't need to point shit out or prove anything anymore about this guy. He's burying himself in front of the whole world on a weekly basis, and will continue to do so. Puppet or no puppet.
Click to expand...
nice rebuttal. my favorite part was the anger, but all the extraordinary claims with no citation, support, evidence, or reference were pretty cool too.

you sound like a petulant angry child.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top