Obamacare: Worste Thing Since Slavery

Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
beenthere said:
Don't let the facts get in your way of your idiocy. LOL


On the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) completed a filibustering address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier opposing the legislation. Until then, the measure had occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays.
The conference bill was passed by both houses of Congress, and was signed into law by President Johnson on July 2, 1964.[SUP][16][/SUP]
Vote totals

Totals are in "Yea–Nay" format:

  • The original House version: 290–130 (69–31%).
  • Cloture in the Senate: 71–29 (71–29%).
  • The Senate version: 73–27 (73–27%).
  • The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289–126 (70–30%).
By party

The original House version:[SUP][17][/SUP]

  • Democratic Party: 152–96 (61–39%)
  • Republican Party: 138–34 (80–20%)
Cloture in the Senate:[SUP][18][/SUP]

  • Democratic Party: 44–23 (66–34%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
The Senate version:[SUP][17][/SUP]

  • Democratic Party: 46–21 (69–31%)
  • Republican Party: 27–6 (82–18%)
Click to expand...
That's Racist!

and the very next day all the racists switched from D to R and the democrats lived happily ever after, tricking ignorant fools educated in impoverished inner city schools destroyed by decades of democrat policy to vote democrat, cuz republicans are meanies.
The End.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Government paid for Carsons food, housing and education He is a welfare success story and proof affirmative action works
Click to expand...
Then why are there so many failures who benefited from affirmative action? Does preferential treatment benefit the receiver? Sure. But does it justify treating people differently based on there race? No. Welfare wasn't affirmative action, anyway. Your proposition is based on a lie.
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
Balzac89 said:
He made a very moronic statement
Click to expand...
Or something you disagree with, so you resort to name calling . I might point out that he has saved countless lives, pioneered new surgical techniques, received a Nobel Prize, and sat at the dinner table with the president. His services are valued at tens of thousands an hour, yet he gives most of them away for free. What have you done that makes you fit to judge him?
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
GOD HERE said:
Jesus god. Okay, liberalism and socialism are two completely different ideologies. That's why they have different names. In most other countries, the liberals and the conservatives are draped in the same party since they are two different factions of the same ideology. Socialism is simply the idea that workers should have control over what they produce, otherwise known as public control over the means of production. If you are going to use big words, make sure you know what they mean.
Click to expand...
Socialism is STATE control over the means of production. If you are going to use big words, make sure you know what they mean.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
beenthere said:
So Robert Byrd the democrat and former KKK member changed parties later on and became republican????
Click to expand...
i see you have now resorted to changing the subject LOL

turns out the statement i made about civil rights being decided primarily by region rather than party was too correct for you to rebut LOL

next time, just keep your mouth shut instead of opening it to remove all doubt LOL

beenthere said:
You're still butt hurt about me posting those pics showing your plants drying in the same room as your cat liter box, aren't you.
What a f...ing tool! LOL
Click to expand...
actually, i posted those pics LOL

there's not a single room in my house at october harvest that doesn't have weed in it hanging to dry LOL

and i still haven't managed to teach my cats to climb a 12 foot ladder and shit in the attic LOL

LOL


































LOL
 
GOD HERE

GOD HERE

Well-Known Member
Red1966 said:
Socialism is STATE control over the means of production. If you are going to use big words, make sure you know what they mean.
Click to expand...
That's where direct democracy comes in. It's not a republican STATE where people have little to no say, it's a form of decentralized socialism that uses direct democracy.
 
B

beenthere

New Member
UncleBuck said:
i see you have now resorted to changing the subject LOL

turns out the statement i made about civil rights being decided primarily by region rather than party was too correct for you to rebut LOL

next time, just keep your mouth shut instead of opening it to remove all doubt LOL



actually, i posted those pics LOL

there's not a single room in my house at october harvest that doesn't have weed in it hanging to dry LOL

and i still haven't managed to teach my cats to climb a 12 foot ladder and shit in the attic LOL

LOL

LOL
Click to expand...
Look at your figures again, it didn't prove jack!

You are correct though, you were the first to post that pic of your plants drying in the same room as your cat shit filled litter box, funny thing was, you didn't realize the litter box was in the photo! LMFAO
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
beenthere said:
Look at your figures again, it didn't prove jack!
Click to expand...
civil rights was an issue decided by region, not party. both parties had majority support for civil rights, not the case for both regions.

[h=4]y party and region[edit][/h]Note:*"Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the*Confederate States of America*in the*American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.
The original House version:

  • Southern Democrats: 7–87 * (7–93%)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–10 * (0–100%)

  • Northern Democrats: 145–9 * (94–6%)
  • Northern Republicans: 138–24 * (85–15%)
The Senate version:

  • Southern Democrats: 1–20 * (5–95%) (only*Ralph Yarborough*of*Texas*voted in favor)
  • Southern Republicans: 0–1 * (0–100%) (John Tower*of*Texas)
  • Northern Democrats: 45–1 * (98–2%) (only*Robert Byrd*of*West Virginia*voted against)
  • Northern Republicans: 27–5 * (84–16%)
 
Red1966

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I ain't worried. It's not I live in some shit hole third world country like Columbia or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top