Obstruction - The right's last option

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
I never claimed the Democrats obstructed Bush "anywhere close the level" Republicans have obstructed Obama.
Click to expand...
you said "exact same behavior", kiddo.

not sure if you learned this at devryU, but words do have meanings.

go ahead and try to weasel out though, like you always do.

tokeprep said:
there were principled reasons the Republicans could have voted against them.
Click to expand...
what principled reason did the republicans have for voting against health care for 9/11 first responders who were misled about the safety of ground zero by their own government?

you remember the 9/11 first responders, right? the republicans used them as a crutch for years.

you probably weren't old enough to remember though, you were too young to remember the dean scream after all.

are you even 14 yet?

tokeprep said:
You told is it was all about racism.
Click to expand...
not quite a sentence in english, yet still recognizable as an uncitable lie.

try harder, kiddo.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you are aware of the existence of record keeping and facts, right?

because you are lying through your teeth right now, just like your big bruvva, bigotedNpushy.

have fun following in his footsteps. i'll take mine without cilantro on toasted bread please.
Click to expand...
We already discussed this, Buck. Do I need to make it more apparent to you? Here:

DIVIDEND TAX CUT FOR THE RICH.

Not repealed, for the rich. Sorry, kiddo. Sorry.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Buck's jealous because I have a doctorate and actually have worked in his beloved government and on Capitol Hill.
Click to expand...
considering your propensity for lying and your inability to recall the dean scream of 2004, i highly doubt you have made it out of high school.

playing mock UN in 8th grade social studies on a trip to DC does not count as working at capitol hill.
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
I never claimed the Democrats obstructed Bush "anywhere close the level" Republicans have obstructed Obama. I said the Democrats' obstruction of Bush empowered the Republicans to use the same tactics against Obama.

As for those votes, we've already discussed that there were principled reasons the Republicans could have voted against them. You told is it was all about racism.
Click to expand...
I'm afraid I'm going to have to take a public stance. Tokeprep is political poison. He can argue a point, but can't seem to decide what he actually believes in. This is the worst sort of politician/pundit. The epitome of douchebaggery. One whose views can be bought and sold. Makes me want to vomit.
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
We already discussed this, Buck. Do I need to make it more apparent to you? Here:

DIVIDEND TAX CUT FOR THE RICH.

Not repealed, for the rich. Sorry, kiddo. Sorry.
Click to expand...
business.jpg


ruh roh - bold letters - dudemandudebroamigocompadrebro means biddness.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
We already discussed this, Buck. Do I need to make it more apparent to you? Here:

DIVIDEND TAX CUT FOR THE RICH.

Not repealed, for the rich. Sorry, kiddo. Sorry.
Click to expand...
you can try to be a little weasel and change the goalposts, the fact is that it only highlights what a liar you are though.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
you said "exact same behavior", kiddo.

not sure if you learned this at devryU, but words do have meanings.

go ahead and try to weasel out though, like you always do.
Click to expand...
Filibustering, threatening to filibuster, etc. is the "exact same behavior." Same actions. Not sure if you learned this, but words have meanings, kiddo.

Let me help you out again:

be·hav·ior
biˈhāvyər/
noun
noun: behaviour; noun: behavior
1.
the way in which one acts or conducts oneself, esp. toward others.
"good behavior"
synonyms:conduct, deportment, bearing, actions, doings; More

The quantity of behavior has no bearing on the fact that it is exactly the same behavior.

what principled reason did the republicans have for voting against health care for 9/11 first responders who were misled about the safety of ground zero by their own government?

you remember the 9/11 first responders, right? the republicans used them as a crutch for years.

you probably weren't old enough to remember though, you were too young to remember the dean scream after all.

are you even 14 yet?
Click to expand...
It would cost the government money. You might not like the reason but that doesn't mean it isn't principled.

not quite a sentence in english, yet still recognizable as an uncitable lie.

try harder, kiddo.
Click to expand...
Obviously I'm not going to dig up the thread for you now, but you said the Republicans' obstruction of Obama was all based on one thing: race. I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers.
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Pinworm said:
The party of "fiscal responsibility" blows 29 billion on a temper tantrum, and kills 1mil + jobs. Same party that ran on economic stability, and job creation. Icing on the irony cake.
Click to expand...
Democrat policies, unrestrained by the conservatives republicans and constitutionalists would have done far worse than stop government discretionary spending for a week, they would transform this union of sovereign states into an unrecognizable imperialist theocracy, ruled by the left's high priests of political correctness, and the press' eagerness to prove how much more liberal and enlightened they are than anyone else.

we would become a banana republic, where El Presidente Por Vivo Barrack Hussein Obama bestows his largesse freely upon those who offer him fealty, and punishes dissenters in the grand Marxist traditions of Gulag.
 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
Pinworm said:
I'm afraid I'm going to have to take a public stance. Tokeprep is political poison. He can argue a point, but can't seem to decide what he actually believes in. This is the worst sort of politician/pundit. The epitome of douchebaggery. One whose views can be bought and sold. Makes me want to vomit.
Click to expand...
I'm not a partisan hack. Most of the people in this forum will blindly follow "their side" to any end. I will not. My side is whoever I think is right about a given issue. I criticize the Republicans and the Democrats extensively. I think they're all horrible.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Filibustering, threatening to filibuster, etc. is the "exact same behavior." Same actions. Not sure if you learned this, but words have meanings, kiddo.

Let me help you out again:

be·hav·ior
biˈhāvyər/
noun
noun: behaviour; noun: behavior
1.
the way in which one acts or conducts oneself, esp. toward others.
"good behavior"
synonyms:
conduct, deportment, bearing, actions, doings; More

The quantity of behavior has no bearing on the fact that it is exactly the same behavior.
Click to expand...
the republican's obstructionism is unprecedented, which can not be reconciled with your phrase "exact same behavior".

because if it were the exact same behavior, there would be precedent.

there is not.



tokeprep said:
It would cost the government money. You might not like the reason but that doesn't mean it isn't principled.
Click to expand...
there is no principled reason to oppose health care for 9/11 first responders who were misled by their own government about the safety of ground zero.

sorry kiddo.



tokeprep said:
Obviously I'm not going to dig up the thread for you now, but you said the Republicans' obstruction of Obama was all based on one thing: race. I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers.
Click to expand...
thanks for admitting you are unable to back up your lies with evidence, you take after your big bruvva in that respect.
 
Pinworm

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
Democrat policies, unrestrained by the conservatives republicans and constitutionalists would have done far worse than stop government discretionary spending for a week, they would transform this union of sovereign states into an unrecognizable imperialist theocracy, ruled by the left's high priests of political correctness, and the press' eagerness to prove how much more liberal and enlightened they are than anyone else.

we would become a banana republic, where El Presidente Por Vivo Barrack Hussein Obama bestows his largesse freely upon those who offer him fealty, and punishes dissenters in the grand Marxist traditions of Gulag.
Click to expand...
Fealty I have offered not, sir, however I DO like how that sounded for some wierd subliminal reason. El Presidente Por Vivo. Secksy. What was that about marxism, again? Ugh...marxism again?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
Democrat policies, unrestrained by the conservatives republicans and constitutionalists would have done far worse than stop government discretionary spending for a week, they would transform this union of sovereign states into an unrecognizable imperialist theocracy, ruled by the left's high priests of political correctness, and the press' eagerness to prove how much more liberal and enlightened they are than anyone else.

we would become a banana republic, where El Presidente Por Vivo Barrack Hussein Obama bestows his largesse freely upon those who offer him fealty, and punishes dissenters in the grand Marxist traditions of Gulag.
Click to expand...
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
Filibustering, threatening to filibuster, etc. is the "exact same behavior." Same actions. Not sure if you learned this, but words have meanings, kiddo.

Let me help you out again:

be·hav·ior
biˈhāvyər/
noun
noun: behaviour; noun: behavior
1.
the way in which one acts or conducts oneself, esp. toward others.
"good behavior"
synonyms:conduct, deportment, bearing, actions, doings; More

The quantity of behavior has no bearing on the fact that it is exactly the same behavior.



It would cost the government money. You might not like the reason but that doesn't mean it isn't principled.



Obviously I'm not going to dig up the thread for you now, but you said the Republicans' obstruction of Obama was all based on one thing: race. I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers.
Click to expand...
WTF does the infamous Dean Scream have to do with republicans trying to stop Barrack The Unready from tearing up the constitution?


 
S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
collector said:
[video=youtube;rvMZ-dzz2Cg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvMZ-dzz2Cg[/video]
Click to expand...
too funny, reminds me of when a friend tried to sell a futon on craigslist and somebody called to "trade" something..something as useless as a snapping turtle:lol:
 
Dr Kynes

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
Pinworm said:
Fealty I have offered not, sir, however I DO like how that sounded for some wierd subliminal reason. El Presidente Por Vivo. Secksy. What was that about marxism, again? Ugh...marxism again?
Click to expand...
yes, Marxism again.

Marxism is a turd that wont flush, and if the Marxists stop Marxing, ill stop talking about Marx.





 
T

tokeprep

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
the republican's obstructionism is unprecedented, which can not be reconciled with your phrase "exact same behavior".

because if it were the exact same behavior, there would be precedent.

there is not.
Click to expand...
The precedent is that someone else did it first. You need a definition of that word too?

there is no principled reason to oppose health care for 9/11 first responders who were misled by their own government about the safety of ground zero.

sorry kiddo.
Click to expand...
Bullshit. Separate your disagreement with the position from your insistence that it cannot be principled.

thanks for admitting you are unable to back up your lies with evidence, you take after your big bruvva in that respect.
Click to expand...
It's not that I'm unable, it's that I'm unwilling, because the thread was from many months ago and I'm not going to search for it.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
tokeprep said:
The precedent is that someone else did it first. You need a definition of that word too?
Click to expand...
no one has ever obstructed in the manner that the GOP is currently obstructing. do you even know what precedent means?

clearly not.

tokeprep said:
Bullshit. Separate your disagreement with the position from your insistence that it cannot be principled.
Click to expand...
what part of using the 9/11 first responders as political props for years and then denying them health care is principled?

words have meanings, ya know.



tokeprep said:
It's not that I'm unable, it's that I'm unwilling, because the thread was from many months ago and I'm not going to search for it.
Click to expand...
no, you're unable. you're just tossing out lies and hoping some stick.

lame, but not unexpected considering your family and southern education.
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Dr Kynes said:
WTF does the infamous Dean Scream have to do with republicans trying to stop Barrack The Unready from tearing up the constitution?
Click to expand...
why does the SCOTUS keep siding with obama then?

kinda seems like you are living in bizarro world, still fighting the cold war one purple prose post at a time, and trying your best to bury and disguise your racist ideation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top