Oh. My. Gawd. (Jersey accent)

ginjawarrior

Well-Known Member
The edit feature is for typos. Any substantive remarks should be in a separate post.

It's common courtesy.
i wasnt trying to obfuscate what i said i started edit quite early but being slightly addled tonight took slightly longer
but duely noted
I don't agree with it either.

:peace:
im glad theres something we agree on ;)

shit does happen whoever is in charge its how that shit is prosecuted that shows where the sentiments lie

:peace:bongsmilie
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
Buck, it took the major media outlets (with the exception of Fox News) weeks after the fact to comment on Climategate in the first place.

And as far as any exoneration is concerned....

WEAK sauce.

Unless you are referring to the IPCC report on receding Himalayan Glaciers.

Then....

WINNING! :-P
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Then by your toy logic Abu Ghraib is not the ultimate responsibility of Dubya.

Or is my sauce really that weak?
i never said that abu ghraib was the ultimate responsibility of shrub.

but you did say that the morlock incident was to be laid exactly at the feet of obama.

justify that, mofo.

yes, your sauce is getting VERY weak.

WINNING.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
i never said that abu ghraib was the ultimate responsibility of shrub.

but you did say that the morlock incident was to be laid exactly at the feet of obama.

justify that, mofo.

yes, your sauce is getting VERY weak.

WINNING.
Actually, Buck.

What I said was that that if Abu Grahaib is the responsibility of Bush, then THIS scandal is the responsibility of Obama.

At least, that is what I INTENDED to put forth, with the TIGER BLOOD and all.

:-P
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Actually, Buck.

What I said was that that if Abu Grahaib is the responsibility of Bush, then THIS scandal is the responsibility of Obama.

At least, that is what I INTENDED to put forth, with the TIGER BLOOD and all.

:-P
actually, johnny.

what you said was this.

Because in your desperation to make this her responsibility, you are underscoring EXACTLY at whose feet this SHOULD be laid: The Community Organizer.
no if-then statement there.

your tiger blood is no match for my ADONIS DNA.

WINNING!

:-P
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
actually, johnny.

what you said was this.



no if-then statement there.

your tiger blood is no match for my ADONIS DNA.

WINNING!

:-P
The underlying point is the if-then thingee.

As I made clear subsequently, that is what I intended to put forth.

Using one comment without the context of the others makes your other arguments look like droopy-eyed, armless children.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
the greatest utility of this thread has not been the op, but the lively back and forth it has spurred.
I wholeheartedly agree.

The thread topic truly is weak sauce.

But, the exchanges displayed here are the rocket fuel that lives in the tip of my saber.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
The underlying point is the if-then thingee.

As I made clear subsequently, that is what I intended to put forth.

Using one comment without the context of the others makes your other arguments look like droopy-eyed, armless children.
this is rather offensive to droopy-eyed, armless children at home and abroad.

just another example of your bigotry towards the handicapped.

:shock:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
ouch.


.............
sorry to say, man.

palin gossip is passe.

and morlock will be spending 24 years in prison for his crimes.

but you will live in my heart forever for starting a thread that allows so many charlie sheen references.

we all enjoy banging 7-gram threads to the brain, in the parlance of sheen.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
this is rather offensive to droopy-eyed, armless children at home and abroad.

just another example of your bigotry towards the handicapped.

:shock:
More specifically my animus against dead actors, crooners, and aging rock stars. Sinatra, Flynn, Jagger, Richards; all of 'em just look like that to me.
:fire:
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
More specifically my animus against dead actors, crooners, and aging rock stars. Sinatra, Flynn, Jagger, Richards; all of 'em just look like that to me.
:fire:

what can you possibly have against sinatra?

one time, i worked at a call center. they trained for two weeks, but after that you had to take calls all alone.

i showed up to my first day or real work completely hungover. despite the fact that i drink plenty, i have only been hungover a few times in my life. this was the worst case.

anyhoo, i sit down at my desk and get ready to take my first call. the caller's name?

'Keith Richards-Dinger'

and after working there for a while, i never saw a name so odd, fake or real.

thus concludes my rambling.
 

Johnnyorganic

Well-Known Member
this is rather offensive to droopy-eyed, armless children at home and abroad.

just another example of your bigotry towards the handicapped.

:shock:
what can you possibly have against sinatra?

one time, i worked at a call center. they trained for two weeks, but after that you had to take calls all alone.

i showed up to my first day or real work completely hungover. despite the fact that i drink plenty, i have only been hungover a few times in my life. this was the worst case.

anyhoo, i sit down at my desk and get ready to take my first call. the caller's name?

'Keith Richards-Dinger'

and after working there for a while, i never saw a name so odd, fake or real.

thus concludes my rambling.
Two Sheen references in a row.

You disappoint me, Buck.

Isn't Palin the AntiClinton? (think antichrist)
Try AntiObama.

He's the Messiah, after all.

If Palin were the opposite of Clinton, she would be called the AntiCunt.
 

Charlie Ventura

Active Member
Hate to disappoint the lefties here in the forum, but Palin won't run for president. She'll just stay where she's most effective and that is with the point of one of her high heels jambed to the hilt in your eye FOREVER! :bigjoint:
 
Top