Bukvičák
Well-Known Member
I do know nothing about his cock, but this was quite funny... like a poet W. Shakespeare the 2ndmaybe it's the tiny cock you're packing in your pants that makes the magic happen.
I do know nothing about his cock, but this was quite funny... like a poet W. Shakespeare the 2ndmaybe it's the tiny cock you're packing in your pants that makes the magic happen.
is your sun delivering 900/1500 micro moles 18 hours per day ?The sun is apparently between 900/1500 par depending on variables so to say seedlings etc only needs 300 or whatever clearly is wrong as the sun's par is never that low yet cannabis constantly grows fine.
Day 69 of flower sir. I'd have been lost without your advice. Thanks for getting me back on trackjohnny your plants are cool but keep in mind your never want the plants to yellow
you must keep them healthy green until the end
I'm sure @.Smoke can speak for himself, but I've followed his journal. He certainly does not need your advice, but I'm sure he'll have a good laugh at your expense when he sees your post..smoke, if i may, this plant is getting too much light
it's the perfect exemple of light stress in veg
just turn on one lamp on 2 at this stage
I don't know how real this is, but it's what I got. It seems to read similar to what the graphs for my lights show.from what I gathered the general numbers are those
-seedling 60/100 umoles
-veg 300/500 umoles
-flower 800/1000
-flower+CO2 around 800/100ppm up to 1500 umoles
more that is not useful to the plant, since the light provided energy can be used and stored up to a certain point.
even after u set ambient temperatures of 30c+ where the cinetic energy of ambient pump plant phytoreactions to the top levels archivable its wasted money in my point of view to supplement more than those levels of energy.
I get my umoles (more or less) from the spec sheet of my 308 lm301b pcb
having a scheme of what umoles I get on a certain amperage
i have the rough estimate
worse thing was that almost every spec sheets has a total umoles emitted value tested in a sphere so not exatly the same output would get to the canopy....
had to dive deep in to inverse square law to have a realistic estimate of my canopy esposition!!
sadly couldn't afford a real par reader...what brand did u get?