CrackerJax
New Member
One is based on reason, one is not. Can't tell the difference???
out.
out.
No, I can't.......but it seems as if you are right on this one.....without sensible reasoning were would we be today, I still think that was a brave mutha who set out to prove the planet round on popular unsound reasoning (that was stupid), or a couple of brothers trying to fly like birds ( 2 dummies IMO), or...........(ding) sorry gotta split, that was my pizzaOne is based on reason, one is not. Can't tell the difference???
out.
Not to mention that when the CHURCH was fully in control of people's lives in the past, anyone coming up with a VALID scientific discovery which flew in the face of the church fathers faced death or internment.No, I can't.......but it seems as if you are right on this one.....without sensible reasoning were would we be today, I still think that was a brave mutha who set out to prove the planet round on popular unsound reasoning (that was stupid), or a couple of brothers trying to fly like birds ( 2 dummies IMO), or...........(ding) sorry gotta split, that was my pizza
Oh I have carefully read the Bible upside down and sideways, and I am familiar with the contents (though some parts are infinitely more interesting than others, and some parts don't make a ton of sense). I hope that non-believers will at least read both sides of the argument when it comes to the allegation that the story of Jesus is an amalgamation of various saviour myths: http://www.christian-thinktank.com/copycat.html... also http://www.tektonics.org/copycat/mithra.html. It would seem that one would have to carefully consider the points and counterpoints when it comes to this matter. It is intellectually dishonest not to. I think that people who have not read both sides cannot state anything categorically, while people who have read both sides also cannot state anything categorically... because we were not there... it is the chicken & egg thing.The reason why people doubt Jesus is because they have CAREFULLY read the BIBLE. Try it some time.
Agreed 100%! I have a strong desire to DO something somewhere that will make a difference in the world. I'm talking about working at something like an African fistula clinic or fighting some Cambodian child pornography ring. There are lots of howevers in the mix that make me sad though.... I have 2 kids to think of- age 4 & 7... do I drag them to Africa to save the world?? (maybe, I don't know; other people do it... but I am not sure) Also we have just enough money to get by on (btw we live on 20-50% less than what everyone else around us thinks they need)... we all know the way the world works-- the people at the top have all the real money (power) and they give us each just enough to stay stuck in the system, but not enough to help the people who need the most help. Anyway, I have lots of great ideas but no money. Also, these days aid organizations practically want you to have a PhD in the subject... I don't think it's like it used to be, where you could just show up and say I'm ready to work. Add to this the fact I have a debilitating chronic pain condition; I am not so sure I will be able to personally save the world at this time.Words are fine, but it is action which truly counts. When you look at what man has done with the words, it is a horrific way to live.
Aetheism can be acheived just as easily.Well. One would assume any given atheist is quite secular. So having the benefit of not living in a fairy tale reality.... Duh?
One era's religions are the next era's myths & legends.
I don't expect religion to be gone any time soon. It's the easiest thing in the world. It requires no rational, logical, or intelligent thought(IQ).
Actually I was born to Wonder and Question....Indeed, atheism is just as easy. We're all born that way.
Thats one way to put it.I thought agnosticism was based on ignorance, no offense.
Isn't it basically saying, "I do not have enough information to make a valid decision."? Or, "I don't know."? Or, "I'm ignorant of the truth."?
can you please support that comment with evidence? the problem with the theory of evolution is that it looks good on paper but when it comes down to it they cannot find a single missing link between ANY species to support it..All gods we know of were created by men. I consider that to be a truth. I was born into an LDS family. I realized I wasn't a theist at the age of 5. I realized I was an atheist, and what atheism was, much later. I currently consider myself a secular humanist. I really don't like the two-faced people religion creates. Part of me believes religions promote evil. All of the most 'evil' events in history are tied deeply to religions. Most prisoners are believers, disproportionately so.
It's kind of like the chicken and the egg and which one came first. Intelligent design could support the notion the chicken came first. Reality, and scientific research shows the egg came first. That another animal's offspring(egg) mutated(evolved) into a chicken.
Which do you think came first? Man or Man's gods? They're not the gods of monkies, chimpanzees, dogs, cats, or any other animals. I don't see them reading the bible, being baptized, worshipping idols(well I think my dogs worship me... but I am their leader and feed them and take care of them), etc.
And if I have a soul, and I'm not saying I do, then I would say my dog does, every animal, and all lifeforms(plants, bacteria, viruses, etc).
I can come to terms with some new agers, actually. That the soul is the measurable electrochemical energy.
Perhaps if people focused more on physical reality instead of spirituality... our planet wouldn't be so fucked up.
But the guy in the sky? Heaven/hell? Eternal something for finite something. That's an uneven deal no matter how you slice it. I figured that out when I was 5. Why? I could never get satisfying answers to most of my questions.