Yes it is the right carbon to use!sure but thats not the right carbon to use. that is meant to catch larger particles of poop and foods...not vapours. there is no vapours in water. you get what ya pay for there.
As for CAN filters, I believe they were reloadedable at some point. Since they have a larger "carbon cargo" area it's a bit safer to have the DIY guys reload the filter. the air is likely to touch carbon if it has to travel through 2" of carbon vs 1" for example. I do not know if those are the proper numbers. This also explains the extra weight of the CAN filters. They have more carbon of the cheaper chunkier carbon.
Why is RC-48 carbon (finely crushed carbon) better then standard fish carbon? Let's think of a tube 4" in diameter. Let's fill that tube with rocks... is it full? No, let's put some sand to fit between those rocks... is it full? For this analogy it is. The point is, the pourus rock in this tube by itself would allow air being pulled through it a probability that it sneaked past the rocks without touching them. If the finer rock (like sand or RC-48 carbon) was used then the air would be to guaranteed to touch carbon.
http://www.who-sells-it.com/images/catalogs/1904/pdf_7833.pdfReplacement Carbon
The same high-quality CKV-4 activated carbon used in Can Filters,
available separately in a 25-pound bucket or 25-kilogram bag.
CF Replacement Carbon, 25 lb Bucket .................$72.95
CF Replacement Carbon, 25 kg Bag.....................$150.95
my second choice to can filter,Also investigate Mountain Air filters. They cost more, but last three years. That's what they claim anyway. Mine's been going almost that long with no problems.
Fred