Physicist Develops Lens to View Alternate Reality of Hidden Alien Dimensions
- Thread starter ClaytonBigsby
- Start date
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Going to want to smoke lots of DMT. So do I
I want to see some crazy shit just haven't gotten around to extracting it still need to buy the shit to extract from. Lol
oldtimer54
Well-Known Member
Damn Bigsby that's old news. George Norry broke that story almost 2 years ago.
Along with the story that Bernie Sanders would replace Obama in the upcoming election. Oh, I believe my friend !
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Chacruna leaf is pretty cheap online, and you can use Isopropyl Alcohol and Naphtha to make a Polarized extraction.Going to want to smoke lots of DMT. So do I
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Religious Ayahuasca use is not Illegal
Gonzales V O Centro
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1084.pdf
Congress enacted the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) in response to Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith, 494 U. S. 872, where, in upholding a generally applicable law that burdened the sacramental use of peyote, this Court held that the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause does not require judges to engage in a case-by-case assessment of the religious burdens imposed by facially constitutional laws, id., at 883–890. Among other things, RFRA prohibits the Federal Government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion, “even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability,” 42 U. S. C. §2000bb–1(a), except when the Government can “demonstrat[e] that application of the burden to the person (1) [furthers] a compelling government interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that . . . interest,” §2000bb–1(b). Members of respondent church (UDV) receive communion by drinking hoasca, a tea brewed from plants unique to the Amazon Rainforest that contains DMT, a hallucinogen regulated under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, see 21 U. S. C. §812(c), Schedule I(c). After U. S. Customs inspectors seized a hoasca shipment to the American UDV and threatened prosecution, the UDV filed this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging, inter alia, that applying the Controlled Substances Act to the UDV’s sacramental hoasca use violates RFRA. At a hearing on the UDV’s preliminary injunction motion, the Government conceded that the challenged application would substantially burden a sincere exercise of religion, but argued that this burden did not violate RFRA because applying the Controlled Substances Act was the least restrictive means of advancing three compelling governmental interests: protecting UDV members’ health and safety, preventing the diversion of hoasca from the church to recreational users, and complying with the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances. The District Court granted relief, concluding that, because the parties’ evidence on health risks and diversion was equally balanced, the Government had failed to demonstrate a compelling interest justifying the substantial burden on the UDV. The court also held that the 1971 Convention does not apply to hoasca. The Tenth Circuit affirmed.
Held:
The courts below did not err in determining that the Government
failed to demonstrate, at the preliminary injunction stage, a compelling interest in barring the UDV’s sacramental use of hoasca Pp. 6–19.
Gonzales V O Centro
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1084.pdf
Congress enacted the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) in response to Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith, 494 U. S. 872, where, in upholding a generally applicable law that burdened the sacramental use of peyote, this Court held that the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause does not require judges to engage in a case-by-case assessment of the religious burdens imposed by facially constitutional laws, id., at 883–890. Among other things, RFRA prohibits the Federal Government from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion, “even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability,” 42 U. S. C. §2000bb–1(a), except when the Government can “demonstrat[e] that application of the burden to the person (1) [furthers] a compelling government interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that . . . interest,” §2000bb–1(b). Members of respondent church (UDV) receive communion by drinking hoasca, a tea brewed from plants unique to the Amazon Rainforest that contains DMT, a hallucinogen regulated under Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, see 21 U. S. C. §812(c), Schedule I(c). After U. S. Customs inspectors seized a hoasca shipment to the American UDV and threatened prosecution, the UDV filed this suit for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging, inter alia, that applying the Controlled Substances Act to the UDV’s sacramental hoasca use violates RFRA. At a hearing on the UDV’s preliminary injunction motion, the Government conceded that the challenged application would substantially burden a sincere exercise of religion, but argued that this burden did not violate RFRA because applying the Controlled Substances Act was the least restrictive means of advancing three compelling governmental interests: protecting UDV members’ health and safety, preventing the diversion of hoasca from the church to recreational users, and complying with the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances. The District Court granted relief, concluding that, because the parties’ evidence on health risks and diversion was equally balanced, the Government had failed to demonstrate a compelling interest justifying the substantial burden on the UDV. The court also held that the 1971 Convention does not apply to hoasca. The Tenth Circuit affirmed.
Held:
The courts below did not err in determining that the Government
failed to demonstrate, at the preliminary injunction stage, a compelling interest in barring the UDV’s sacramental use of hoasca Pp. 6–19.
Unclebaldrick
Well-Known Member
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
your sister is pretty cheap.
bluntmassa1
Well-Known Member
Yeah that's the one I was thinking of just didn't know how to spell it I'm pretty sure that was the strongest one you can buy now that root bark shit is illegal. I'm going to need to buy that other herb to make some ayahuasca too should be fun can't die without going on that trip.
ClaytonBigsby
Well-Known Member
Never thought I would "like" a Chinslappy post.
Don;t know where you've been kid, but it looks like you've been growing
Don;t know where you've been kid, but it looks like you've been growing
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Also, DPT is legal. It is related to DMT, but instead of Dimethyltryptamine, it is Dipropyltryptamine.
And DPT is used by the Temple of True Inner Light, which used to be a Jewish Synagogue, but when they discovered the properties of DPT the Synagogue became a Temple where people can go and have Intravenous DPT doses.
In Sasha Shulgins book TIHKAL, he talks about how a DEA agent contacted him to ask him about DPT because someone at the Temple had referred the agent to Sasha when they were doing an investigation. The DEA has, since then, never caused problems for the Temple of True Inner Light.
DPT can be found online and can be taken orally or smoked, it does not need an MAOI like DMT as it breaks down differently in the stomach.
DiPT is more closely related to DPT than DMT is, and it causes Auditory alterations. Sasha did a test with people who had perfect pitch at a Musical University and they were able to explain exactly what the difference in pitches were. Sasha suggested that this could be used Medically in order to preform something like a Color Blindness test, but on a Chemical and Auditory spectrum.
And DPT is used by the Temple of True Inner Light, which used to be a Jewish Synagogue, but when they discovered the properties of DPT the Synagogue became a Temple where people can go and have Intravenous DPT doses.
In Sasha Shulgins book TIHKAL, he talks about how a DEA agent contacted him to ask him about DPT because someone at the Temple had referred the agent to Sasha when they were doing an investigation. The DEA has, since then, never caused problems for the Temple of True Inner Light.
DPT can be found online and can be taken orally or smoked, it does not need an MAOI like DMT as it breaks down differently in the stomach.
DiPT is more closely related to DPT than DMT is, and it causes Auditory alterations. Sasha did a test with people who had perfect pitch at a Musical University and they were able to explain exactly what the difference in pitches were. Sasha suggested that this could be used Medically in order to preform something like a Color Blindness test, but on a Chemical and Auditory spectrum.
Last edited:
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
The other one is either Syrian Rue or Ayahuasca vine. Both are MAOIs.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
And for anyone who is interested in Religions involving experiences with the Spirit world but is concerned with the current Authoritarian position of America on the subject of consuming what you wish, this is a case where there was a man who believed he was a reincarnation of George Washington and like 10 other people, and he had people mail him money to start the I AM movement, which is a movement that popularized Theosophy in America.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/322/78/case.html
The FBI tried to say that he was committing mail fraud by telling people he was reincarnated people in order to get them to send him money, and the court ruled that it is not within the bounds of the law to rule on the truth of a Religious teaching and that "a man may believe what he can not prove".
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/322/78/case.html
The FBI tried to say that he was committing mail fraud by telling people he was reincarnated people in order to get them to send him money, and the court ruled that it is not within the bounds of the law to rule on the truth of a Religious teaching and that "a man may believe what he can not prove".
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
so is your sister.
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
Finshaggy
Well-Known Member
In Australia, anyone here from Australia probably knows this already, there is the Outback right. It's just like this giant part of, most of, Australia where there is just this giant desert with bushes and trees and animals and some aboriginal tribes. And people say that they see creatures that have human bodies and animal heads.