jeff f
New Member
The question is not faulty it is just moving in another direction.
I would have to say yes to the Second question. Man can severely impact the earth to the point that it negatively affects man (and or the earth)
Case in point, Love Canal, Chernobyl, Three mile Island, Exxon Valdez, India's ship dismantling yards, Chinas exorbant amount of pollution from their largely dirty coal fired powered plants. Closer to home, older landfills that leak Mercury and other heavy metals into our water supply. Pit mines that do the same. Waste water treatment plants that expel the "treated" water out into our oceans. (I read somewhere that the city of Los Angeles uses over 1 Billion gallons of fresh water every day just to flush toilets.) Keep in mind that the L.A. basin gets a portion of its water from the Colorado river that in some summers never reaches the ocean.
The same goes for our rivers being polluted. The run-off from our roads and concrete jungles that we call cities delivers so many toxins into our streams (and drains) that surfers and beach goers are warned not to go into the water for Two to Three weeks after it rains.
We collectively have had and are having a profound negative affect on the Earth. Plain and simple there are just too many of us worldwide for the planet and all of her resources to support for an indefinite amount of time.
I agree with the above in regards to global warming. It is just another money scam. Carbon offset credits do NOTHING to curb emissions or pollution. They only provide another way for big money to get bigger.
Modern fuels (gasoline and No.2 Diesel have been cleaned up many times. Diesel in the way of lower Sulpher content and Gasoline in the way of Ethanol blends.
Heres food for thought in regards to fuels. The Sulpher that is removed from the Diesel fuel is then added to Jet fuel, otherwise know as Kerosene. Further more Diesel users have seen a decline in mileage per gallon of fuel.
Gasoline with Ethanol has seen the same reduction in milage. Add to that the additional infrastructure that is required to support the Ethanol is emmense.
Drive through the Dakota's and Ohio. What would you see? Corn fields that dissapear into the horizon. They go on for miles. What is needed to grow this corn? PETROLIUM... Imagine that.
So, what have we gained from any of this? Cleaner fuel, maybe slighlty cleaner but I personally feel that the reduced milage per gallon has negated any benifet from cleaner fuels. (only because we burn more to do the same thing)
Its all about money, plain and simple.
There is a Rollitup member whos sig line read something to the affect of "if they cant tax it they wil just make it illegal"
Its all about money!
Sorry for the rant.
By the way awesome avitar. She rocks!
i agree with what you said but that is why the question is faulty. you are gonna get one anser that doesnt tell you anything. of course man can pollute and affect mankind. nobody is arguing that. the argument is are we causing the earths temperature to rise, if it even is rising.
avatar, she is 46 three kids. ive fucked 21 year olds that didnt have a body like hers....perfect
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeab4/eeab49bc17b053b3028ec7641b4631e5dce7062c" alt="hump :hump: :hump:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeab4/eeab49bc17b053b3028ec7641b4631e5dce7062c" alt="hump :hump: :hump:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeab4/eeab49bc17b053b3028ec7641b4631e5dce7062c" alt="hump :hump: :hump:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eeab4/eeab49bc17b053b3028ec7641b4631e5dce7062c" alt="hump :hump: :hump:"