First, for those of you sad souls who think checking to see if this comes from the same URL is a worthy use of your time, I will save you the energy.
IT DOES, I AM THE PROFESSORS WIFE, AND NOW I AM PISSED.
No, we are not planning to escape with the millions of dollars we have already made from the poor, unsuspecting ROLL IT UP community.
In the spirit of liking a good debate, I have a few questions oh critics of the professor First, is discrediting him so important that helping a patient somewhere would not be a better use of time? Just curious.
I wonder, what exactly FDD and his friends,( who could also all be him as he is a moderator), think we have gained financially that provokes such negativity and hatred. What qualifications do you have my friend? If you are a grower and not just a talker, do you sell your medicine, and if so
how dare you, everything should be done at your own expense.
I can assure those inquiring minds, that no, we are not filthy rich and bathing in tubs of our cash flow on our yacht from our earnings at ROLL IT UP.
1. What pre-requisite exactly, oh powerful blogging boss moderator, do you deem worthy of making a living in this field?
NONE. i have seen some AWESOME first grows.
2. What may I ask, exemplifies one from being labeled a crook? I mean, how dare someone have an idea and
.sell it. If what we were selling was all lies and schemes, wouldnt you think we would be in hiding instead of having a public speaking engagement next week?
i never said anyone was a crook. as a moderator of this site it is my job to stop sales pitches and spamming. i never accused anyone of being crooked though.
3. Do you think because there has been stories in the press about Danas ACTUAL ACHIEVMENTS, he should be subject to open ridicule by egotistical, judgemental computer nerds, while always refraining from comment.
he has done nothing to refrain from commenting and his own comments are what is bringing on the negative responses. he does a pretty good job of insulting.
4. Do you think it fair to openly slander someone, based on no fact whatsoever, and not allow them the courtesy of defending themselves, because perhaps, it makes you look less intelligent?
i have allowed him to defend himself, fully. my intelligence is not a factor.
5. If FDD, lets say you had done anything of note, and some jack ass had the audacity to attack your morality online, would you think it unfair to respond in your honor? Would you think it the right for some random person who knows nothing from a hole in the wall to cast dispursions, while standing behind bullet proof glass?
i get attacked daily. i try my best to take it with a grain of salt. it is the internet after all.
