eye exaggerate
Well-Known Member
...I'm saying that God is 'no-thing' and we are 'things'. No one can argue that we are not physical beings. If you're scientific then you know that the 'anti' to everything exists. This is the same principle.
Not a person, but an actual thing.......but you're looking at God as a person if you put it like that beef.
What god is to you is your prerogative, but the sense of god you are describing is not the god that an atheist rejects. Some atheists arrive at the position out of anger and rebellion, others are pushed to anger by discrimination and having to live in a world where dogmatic certainty in god causes us hardship and at times outright oppression. In any case, it is not wrong to express my beliefs or criticisms of others beliefs. The goal of debate is to find common ground and to progress past dispute in search of higher ground, argument comes about when people don't observe standards of debate and logic, which causes everyone to waste time chasing their tale, in which case having feet nailed to the floor may be desirable.Heisenberg, sorry, I missed your post about being 'angry over nothing'...
Here's the deal from my perspective. Any time a person has to argue a point it is adding something to nothing. In psychological terms this would be 'aggregates' pasted to archetypes. I've found in my travels that a lot of so-called atheists are angry about their belief, or, non-belief.
Personally, I think we should all be able to learn from each other instead of having to hammer points in like spikes into a hand.
To me, God is this 'no-thing' - but a 'thing' at the same time. God is an acceptance of different modes of living.
No, but many of the original complex proteins that were the first building blocks of life have been replicated in labs.......I'll go back to a post I made in another thread. Has science produced DNA yet from nothing? I don't mean cloning either. I mean, from scratch.
Women are automatically attractive to me, its just natural instinct.So for you it takes effort to find women attractive? The only way you like females is to have low self esteem and try really hard? Someone who is not willing to put in that effort turns to men, because there is no effort involved there? Which means in your mind, finding men attractive is easy, and finding women attractive is difficult?
Has religion produced DNA yet from nothing? I don't mean a story in an old book, I mean proof that religion, or god created DNA....Heisenberg, I agree that we are searching for common ground. I do not agree that running circles is bad. A straight line becomes a circle in time, it is inevitable.
Men are automatically attractive to gay men, it's just natural instinct.Women are automatically attractive to me, its just natural instinct.
Men remind me of myself, and I am not attracted to myself sexually.
I believe I used the wrong term earlier. I said deniability while trying to remember about falsifiability....neer, we are the mystery and the mysteries combined. I don't mean that 'hand is quicker' sht we read about... Maybe I can put it like this... My personal feeling about myth is that it is a reflection of the same being. We are a part of that being. We are hermes, we are adriadne, etc...
Name one scientist who has claimed they can create life from nothing.......no, but religion (as it is known) does not act so arrogantly as to assume it could.
No, you are attacted to sin not the man. Men naturally want to be wicked.Men are automatically attractive to gay men, it's just natural instinct.