Putin’s Troll Army Caught Rigging Twitter To Pretend Trump Won #TrumpWon

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
I admit to not being well versed on what you're talking about. Does it have anything to do with Uranium One or Rosatom? I believe you and everything but I would like to read anything that can make the connection to Ukraine so if you have material I'll read it.
Click to expand...
The shores of the Black Sea are the main source of high grade Ukrainum. The stuff Clinton was pushing def lower shelf stuff. Because his neighbor wasn't using it, Putin politely asked first and then sent in his tanks so they could load up on the nugs and bring them back to Moscow where he uses a paste made with Ukrainium and Marmuset heart worms to warm his cockles of his heart. They don't call him Nuke Putin for nothing. What he really wants is Lithuanium but the Ukrainium makes a reasonable substitute.

JK having some nerdy fun at word play.

You can read about the annexation of Crimea by Russia here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation

Trump had a section of the RNC platform rewritten to make the Republican party policy dovish to the military action taken to relieve responsibility of Crimea from Ukraine. Clinton, not so much. She, along with every other nation views this action as a violation of Ukraine's borders and supports ongoing sanctions against Russia that were implemented shortly after Russia's violation of Ukraine's borders. Russia has in two other instances invaded Ukraine on other trumped up excuses.
 
Last edited:
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
The shores of the Black Sea are the main source of high grade Ukrainum. The stuff Clinton was pushing def lower shelf stuff. Because his neighbor wasn't using it, Putin politely asked first and then sent in his tanks so they could load up on the nugs and bring them back to Moscow where he uses a paste made with Ukrainium and Marmuset heart worms to warm his cockles of his heart. They don't call him Nuke Putin for nothing. What he really wants is Lithuanium but the Ukrainium makes a reasonable substitute.

JK having some nerdy fun at word play.

You can read about the annexation of Crimea by Russia here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annexation_of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation

Trump had a section of the RNC platform rewritten to make the Republican party policy dovish to the military action taken to relieve responsibility of Crimea from Ukraine. Clinton, not so much. She, along with every other nation views this action as a violation of Ukraine's borders and supports ongoing sanctions against Russia that were implemented shortly after Russia's violation of Ukraine's borders. Russia has in two other instances invaded Ukraine on other trumped up excuses.
Click to expand...
In other news, did you hear we just sent 600+ soldiers back into Iraq? I didn't catch which unit, but I suspect either USASOC's subordinate units or one of the10th Mountain's battalions.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
I think by this point, even that unit probably doesn't believe in being back there again, but they'll do what is asked of them dutifully. Love to my brothers and sisters in arms. It's not their fault; it's fucking politics. Be grateful for their commitment to duty, even if you disagree with the direction they are going. We need to create a change back home for them in the government that's hijacking their honorable service so this shit doesn't keep happening.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
I'm not a conspiracy theorist like that, necessarily. I just mean that we something should be done to stop it. We should make like Japan and keep to our goddamned selves. We helped our NATO Allies and policed/plundered the world enough. Just horrifying and disgusting overreach.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
Vnsmkr said:
Theres no end to the monetary gain, whatever that may be. Thats the force behind it that needs to be shut the fuck down
Click to expand...
Money's backed by faith anyway. I don't really get that shit, either. And everyone owes someone else some kind of debt. Everyone's too proud to reconcile everything by finding some kind of different policy or resetting or something. Like, people put wealth over human life and family. I don't understand the logic of shit like that.
 
Vnsmkr

Vnsmkr

Well-Known Member
Maybe it used to be different, but the only thing being protected these days are business interests. Well in reality thats all that were ever protected. It may have been posed as something different, but it wasnt.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
This is fucking insane. Everyone should actively do something because I'm pretty sure the world's about to be destroyed sometime shortly.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
Money's backed by faith anyway. I don't really get that shit, either. And everyone owes someone else some kind of debt. Everyone's too proud to reconcile everything by finding some kind of different policy or resetting or something. Like, people put wealth over human life and family. I don't understand the logic of shit like that.
Click to expand...
Legal tender notes are backed by "full faith and credit". You and I bind the faith and credit with endorsement. Money? Not so much.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
Legal tender notes are backed by "full faith and credit". You and I bind the faith and credit with endorsement. Money? Not so much.
Click to expand...
..You differentiate between legal tender and money/currency?

In any case, it's a manmade concept, and one that people for some incredible reason value more than human life. I personally endorse nothing. I receive a pension, sure, but I don't endorse the idea that it matters more than people.

Edit: Actually, now I'm confused what you meant with everything you just said. Bear with me, sleep deprivation.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
..You differentiate between legal tender and money/currency?

In any case, it's a manmade concept, and one that people for some incredible reason value more than human life. I personally endorse nothing. I receive a pension, sure, but I don't endorse the idea that it matters more than people.

Edit: Actually, now I'm confused what you meant with everything you just said. Bear with me, sleep deprivation.
Click to expand...
No worries. I don't differentiate, Congress does:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/411

Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5115

(a)The Secretary of the Treasury may issue United States currency notes. The notes—
(1)
are payable to bearer; and
(2)
shall be in a form and in denominations of at least one dollar that the Secretary prescribes.
(b)The amount of United States currency notes outstanding and in circulation—
(1)
may not be more than $300,000,000; and
(2)
may not be held or used for a reserve.
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
No worries. I don't differentiate, Congress does:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/411

Federal reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal reserve banks through the Federal reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized. The said notes shall be obligations of the United States and shall be receivable by all national and member banks and Federal reserve banks and for all taxes, customs, and other public dues. They shall be redeemed in lawful money on demand at the Treasury Department of the United States, in the city of Washington, District of Columbia, or at any Federal Reserve bank.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/5115

(a)The Secretary of the Treasury may issue United States currency notes. The notes—
(1)
are payable to bearer; and
(2)
shall be in a form and in denominations of at least one dollar that the Secretary prescribes.
(b)The amount of United States currency notes outstanding and in circulation—
(1)
may not be more than $300,000,000; and
(2)
may not be held or used for a reserve.
Click to expand...
Congress may, but I do not. It's semantics. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying on the whole, it's simply legislative semantics. You're right, technical bullshit as it may be. Regardless, it should not supercede the people who encompass the country that instituted it.
 
twostrokenut

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
Olive Drab Green said:
Congress may, but I do not. It's semantics. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying on the whole, it's simply legislative semantics. You're right, technical bullshit as it may be. Regardless, it should not supercede the people who encompass the country that instituted it.
Click to expand...
First of all thank you for your service.

You have the popular opinion here, no doubt. Legislative semantics affect you, like it or not. One of those currencies, we use today on a 10% fractional reserve, the other may not be held for a reserve. One is elastic and one is not. It's that simple.

I am on your side here..."its not their fault it's just politics" and "we should keep to our goddam selves like Japan".
I agree. Most anyone I have ever talked to also agrees. The fact is that it does supercede The People. Open your mind a little is all I'm asking.

Is a declaration of war semantics? That was serious business because it takes a lot of cash to accomplish and everyone was involved. Now it seems, a few billion here to invade this and that, a few billion there and here to prop up or manipulate that and this, is the new norm. If I can't print my own cash, how much of this and that could I accomplish without your consent?
 
Olive Drab Green

Olive Drab Green

Well-Known Member
twostrokenut said:
First of all thank you for your service.

You have the popular opinion here, no doubt. Legislative semantics affect you, like it or not. One of those currencies, we use today on a 10% fractional reserve, the other may not be held for a reserve. One is elastic and one is not. It's that simple.

I am on your side here..."its not their fault it's just politics" and "we should keep to our goddam selves like Japan".
I agree. Most anyone I have ever talked to also agrees. The fact is that it does supercede The People. Open your mind a little is all I'm asking.

Is a declaration of war semantics? That was serious business because it takes a lot of cash to accomplish and everyone was involved. Now it seems, a few billion here to invade this and that, a few billion there and here to prop up or manipulate that and this, is the new norm. If I can't print my own cash, how much of this and that could I accomplish without your consent?
Click to expand...
Legislative semantics would stop effecting all of us if enough people would take a stand and fight for what's right. It doesn't have to be the way it is, and by next decade or the following one, I predict it won't be. People are nearing the end of their tether. It'll happen soon.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top