Ignorance is not something to be ashamed of unless it's willful. I do not ever point out someone's ignorance as a negative quality. It is not your ignorance I despise, but your willingness to defend it, revel in it, rather than have truth conflict with your belief system. What I point out is your lack of understanding the need for correctly evaluating evidence, correctly arguing without using tricks, and the dangers of not recognizing logical mistakes. Those things are elemental in exploring any claim. I have said nothing about the subject except to say it is irrelevant to my points. I have pointed this out already. Do you not read my posts, not understand them, or choose to ignore them for the sake of having ammo for your next response?
I am not trying to discredit your arguments, but your argument style and ability to judge evidence and recognize bias. And it's not 'everyone else', just you; more deceptive language designed to poison the well. I attack you personally because your logic and attitude inspire it. You attack me and others personally in an attempt to undermine arguments. That is the difference between personal abuse and an ad hominem attack. You subtly attack others personally in hopes the idle reader will ignore or discredit evidence. I have so far not commented on any evidence, just your inability to argue evidence fairly.
There is nothing amazing about your trickery; it's in fact quite bland. You are using well understood and well documented tactics. Your trickery lies in disguising misinformation as facts, and subtle suggestions attempting to unfairly discredit the opposition. I've pointed out several of those tricks in this thread, and your attempts to steer the attention away from those are futile. The way you argue the topic is just as relevant as the topic itself.
Difference is, sarcasm has no place in a debate, or in evaluating a claim. Logic is the very foundation of truth. I have confidence that those able to think clearly will see the things I point out and decide for themselves. I link to an explanation of each trick you use. Anyone who cares can read the definition and decide if you are indeed using that trick or not, those who don't care can ignore my posts. Deceit requires tricks, the truth does not. Judging from the lack of support for your ideas in this thread and others, either people don't care or don't agree.
So i've basically restated myself 4 times now. Your brain keeps coming up with excuses so it doesn't have to feel inferior. Oh hes just angry, his mom didn't love him, he doesn't understand the topic; it all amounts to cognitive dissonance. Your brains attempt to distance itself from the shit pile it lives in.
