record low maximum arctic sea ice

abandonconflict said:

That I'm still waiting for someone to cite a peer reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists.

Click to expand...

Yeah, I got that part.

What I' m not clear about is when, exactly, this all got to be my problem. Are you saying you can't do your own web searches, and need my help?

And if so, how much will this pay me?

freddfish said:

Yeah, I got that part.

What I' m not clear about is when, exactly, this all got to be my problem. Are you saying you can't do your own web searches, and need my help?

And if so, how much will this pay me?

Click to expand...

Hey, carry on, don't let facts (or in your case a lack of facts) keep you from offering your opinion on climate science.

abandonconflict said:

Hey, carry on, don't let facts (or in your case a lack of facts) keep you from offering your opinion on climate science.

Click to expand...

OK, great. I was worried for a bit that I would have to teach you how to use your web browser.

By a happy coincidence, I teach IT classes on the side. Right up my alley...but only it pays good.

Well....glad we got that straightened out. Cheers!

freddfish said:

OK, great. I was worried for a bit that I would have to teach you how to use your web browser.

By a happy coincidence, I teach IT classes on the side. Right up my alley...but only it pays good.

Well....glad we got that straightened out. Cheers!

Click to expand...

Oh, so you're aware of the dearth of peer-reviewed research contradicting the vast majority of climate scientists. So you know your opinion in the thread is worthless yet you argue it anyway.

That makes you stupid. Glad we cleared that up.

Half a Wiki page.

LOL

Well, that was quite a jump. Gratuitous insult, personal attack, all the usual trolling MO.

Took me a little longer than usual to take your measure, but I have it now. Ennui on my part, with your yapping dog content. ...Not my first rodeo, lad.

Well, work out whatever has your drawers in a wad (may I suggest, perhaps, a nice pipefull of Sour Diesel?), and try not to take yourself so seriously, OK?

No one else does, after all...

Cheers!

freddfish said:

Well, that was quite a jump. Gratuitous insult, personal attack, all the usual trolling MO.

Took me a little longer than usual to take your measure, but I have it now. Ennui on my part, with your yapping dog content. ...Not my first rodeo, lad.

Well, work out whatever has your drawers in a wad (may I suggest, perhaps, a nice pipefull of Sour Diesel?), and try not to take yourself so seriously, OK?

No one else does, after all...

Cheers!

Click to expand...

Just one other question, can you please cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists?

abandonconflict said:

Just one other question, can you please cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists?

Click to expand...

I can, I can...

With dots too...

Now it`s your turn to say all of these are lies and yours are correct and undisputable.


http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-studies/


Now let`s hear you deny...

There are about forty, they are a good read and peer reviewed.

well, there is this:

Scientists have found evidence of a huge underground reservoir containing up to three times as much water as on the entirety of the earth’s surface and theorized to be the source for all the world’s oceans.
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/6/13/water-ringwooditeoceans.html

The cold never bothered me anyway...

OddBall1st said:

I can, I can...

With dots too...

Now it`s your turn to say all of these are lies and yours are correct and undisputable.


http://www.c3headlines.com/peer-reviewed-studies/


Now let`s hear you deny...

Click to expand...

That's a blog post, not a peer-reviewed research study.

max420thc said:

NASA,paid by the government, so were the big foot scientist researchers in Oregon,
34 acadamys of science, also paid by the government,
if I remember right at one time the government was saying the only good indian is a dead one,
their soldiers drank the cool aid too, thousands of them running all over the place killing Indians,
cause the only good Indian is a dead one, the history of this country is full of people just like you who drank the cool aid,
I suppose you believe the governments GDP numbers, their unemployment numbers and their inflation numbers, If the government says it it must be true right?
Just like when obamao said we need solar power and wind power, then all his cronies got big fat government contracts making solar panels got rich, then all filed bankruptcy and walked out with billions in tax payer dollars,
keep drinking the cool aid

Click to expand...

..and the government paid by the ruling class..yada, yada.

abandonconflict said:

Just one other question, can you please cite a peer-reviewed research study which contradicts the vast majority of climate scientists?

Click to expand...

Well, that was politely asked, and rates an honest and civil reply. Good deal.

The short answer is, quite simply, that I am unsure if I can provide you with that sort of data, as I have not done any searches for (your words) "peer reviewed research" in this area. And it must be pointed out... a previous attempt at this in an earlier post by another poster didn't meet your standards, so I am not sure what will satisfy you as a credible source.

With all due respect, I never doubted that the climate is changing... I believe it is.

What I have issues with are the notions that it is all man-made, or that mankind can somehow fix it, or that there can be no debate about it. (That's not objective research... It is mere zealotry)

I hope, if we are to go on with this discussion, we can do it in a civil and respectful fashion. I'm up for it.

Cheers!

Gulf stream is cooling and slowing to levels from centuries ago.

Thanks Obama

I slammed the door in your face, your long lying nose went through the panel and I bent it over,....so there you`ll stay...,

freddfish said:

The short answer is, quite simply, that I am unsure if I can provide you with that

Click to expand...

Noted.

OddBall1st said:

That is a blogged post

Click to expand...

That's what I said.

I've found it a waste of my personal time to argue with the brainwashed.

A "scientist" blogger will garner huge internet traffic by being a science denier. No mystery.

There's some black dude with a youtube channel and all he does is bash black people. He's super popular. Fulla shit, but popular.

If I wanted huge web hits and the $$ that comes with it, I'd be controversial. Like a black man ridiculing black folks. Or a scientist denying science. Both are BS marketing for clicks.

abandonconflict said:

That's what I said.

Click to expand...

yup, but you tried to make it out to be the bloggers data. It`s not it is a list of studies made easy to access.

Go through every one of those studies conveniently listed by a blogger.

But don`t try and sell the readers here that the blog is the blogger`s opinion or data. It`s just like you posting a link to me.