Nutty sKunK
Well-Known Member
I think you lost yourself at the YouTube link xDYa lost me at the YouTube link
next
I merely found some results and posted it so people objectively looking at the results can make their own judgement.
I think you lost yourself at the YouTube link xDYa lost me at the YouTube link
next
Yes but the results has no real substance to be honest. I would argue like many others that yes my bud smell more after a few days of drying in the dark.I think you lost yourself at the YouTube link xD
I merely found some results and posted it so people objectively looking at the results can make their own judgement.
It’s the best there is. Until someone does it for themselves which is what I was asking.. if u have access why not?Yes but the results has no real substance to be honest. I would argue like many others that yes my bud smell more after a few days of drying in the dark.
There's no real practical difference between letting the plant stay in total darkness for the last 24h than just cutting and hanging them in the dark for 24 hours, you will accomplish exactly the same result either way.
Don’t forget though that most people who lab test don’t send a sample of every plant. They send a sample of every strain.It’s the best there is. Until someone does it for themselves which is what I was asking.. if u have access why not?
I wouldn’t say exactly the same result as the plants not attached to its life force (its roots).
But if this guy got an extra 2% overall thc it is doing something. And I’m simply curious for more results.
To get any benefit with minimal effort is always a plus
Please give us valid data supporting your claim then? You need at least three different environment and data from same cutting with said measures.It’s the best there is. Until someone does it for themselves which is what I was asking.. if u have access why not?
I wouldn’t say exactly the same result as the plants not attached to its life force (its roots).
But if this guy got an extra 2% overall thc it is doing something. And I’m simply curious for more results.
To get any benefit with minimal effort is always a plus
hey 1% is 1%I take it one step further and actually trim in the dark. My buds come out all mangled, but bruh, the THC levels . . .
What exactly is my claim? I just posted someone else’s claim from results they got. Take it as u will.Please give us valid data supporting your claim then? You need at least three different environment and data from same cutting with said measures.
One run in one environment doesn't tell you anything. You can't compare between runs either, to many variables IMO.
Because I've tried said measurements like 15 years ago without any positive effects what so ever?What exactly is my claim? I just posted someone else’s claim from results they got. Take it as u will.
I just think it’s foolish to deny leaving a plant in darkness before harvesting it isn’t going to have an effect.
That’s the irony with science - it hasn’t figured out how things work science has simply just observed and labels these processes
Before we knew of thc marijuana still got you high.
Why not stick a plant in the dark if it’s convenient to do so then make your own judgement?
Should I use a 4k monitor for this or will a 1440p ultrawide be sufficient?48 hours of porn before chop will leave your budz dripping wet
Gets her resin flowing.48 hours of porn before chop will leave your budz dripping wet
With actual lab testing I've tested this theory. The results were it didn't do anything thc was within .5%+ or -I can admit when I'm wrong and his little test does seem to show some evidence that dark period can help a significant amount in THC but lose in terpenes.
Now obviously this test has a lot of flaws and isnt enough to say confidently one way or another but it's the best one we've had so far.