MisterBouncyBounce
Well-Known Member
you got it.
actually I think its 4When you have a President Elect that appointed 3 ex-Goldman Sachs executives to cabinet positions but call his opponent "the Goldman Sachs candidate" you kind of lose your credibility on the basis you're obviously heavily mentally impaired.
What we've "got" is that you don't understand your own original post. It was liberal propaganda founded on a false premise. Once your propaganda was shredded, you degraded your argument to name calling. You hang on to your claim because, as with Newt, for you feelings > factsyou got it.
The thing you have to understand is most "big donors" back EVERYONE they think might possibly win.actually I think its 4
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2016/12/why_trump_keeps_hiring_goldman_sachs_bankers.html
Bannon is also ex-Goldman, ironically Goldman supported Hillary pretty universally. Strange things!
what our mentally defective friend is really missing is that the dfonations come from individuals who work at these companies, not the companies themselves.The thing you have to understand is most "big donors" back EVERYONE they think might possibly win.
But the fact remains that even large PAC donors hedge their bets...what our mentally defective friend is really missing is that the dfonations come from individuals who work at these companies, not the companies themselves.
and since companies like goldman sachs require a fair amount of education, and since education is anathema to voters for new king trump, they were bound to go hillary's way.
new king trump loves the uneducated.
none of you can fess up to yourselves that you voted for a republican can you. you can't take the pain of having been so fooled and be so wrong.What we've "got" is that you don't understand your own original post. It was liberal propaganda founded on a false premise. Once your propaganda was shredded, you degraded your argument to name calling. You hang on to your claim because, as with Newt, for you feelings > facts
About the only thing we can agree upon is Hillary Clinton was not far enough to the left to satisfy your wishes.
Did you even vote in this past election?
Donald Trump doesnt owe Goldman Sachs anything while Hillary Clinton owed them for millions in campaign donations and other compensation.When you have a President Elect that appointed 3 ex-Goldman Sachs executives to cabinet positions but call his opponent "the Goldman Sachs candidate" you kind of lose your credibility on the basis you're obviously heavily mentally impaired.
Owed them? Owed them what? Not a damn thing. Is she currently in debt to them?Donald Trump doesnt owe Goldman Sachs anything while Hillary Clinton owed them for millions in campaign donations and other compensation.
Lets see what he does before condemning his presidency.
How go be a politer, more courteous cuck.We know, strong successful women intimidate you.
What was it you use to teach again?
Nobody is butt hurt. Maybe you are, I don't know. Your post was shredded because it was based on a false premise. There isn't much else to comment on except to say next time post something that is based on the truth.none of you can fess up to yourselves that you voted for a republican can you. you can't take the pain of having been so fooled and be so wrong.
And here is a news flash for you......I'm not far left.........that's how far right all you Clintonheads are.
you and bucky and a few others know deep down you don't have a clue about how things actually work.
you wait for thoughts to be delivered to you. you see things through a pundit's lens and talk in their language.
It's all empty yakking............and that's why you know very little about reality and how power flows.
one just needs to read politico, the post, the times, cnn and msnbc to know what you and some others here are thinking.
you all aren't just CliontonBots, you are just Bots.
and get over the butt hurt i made you feel already.
You and @MisterBouncyBounce agree. This is what happens when people depart from reality.Donald Trump doesnt owe Goldman Sachs anything while Hillary Clinton owed them for millions in campaign donations and other compensation.
Lets see what he does before condemning his presidency.
fascism's best friend is when people become unable to tell the difference between fact and fiction.You and @MisterBouncyBounce agree. This is what happens when people depart from reality.
no, Wallstreet clearly picked Hillary as their big donation candidate, also the Goldman Sachs $500k speeches.The thing you have to understand is most "big donors" back EVERYONE they think might possibly win.
You think he appponted all those dudes for nothing in return?
Come on now...
trump got more for his wall street speeches you dumb racist hick.no, Wallstreet clearly picked Hillary as their big donation candidate, also the Goldman Sachs $500k speeches.
"Clearly" You know who Trump selected for his cabinet. Actions speak much louder than words.no, Wallstreet clearly picked Hillary as their big donation candidate, also the Goldman Sachs $500k speeches.
Trump picking Goldman members for his cabinet does not invalidate that big money and wallstreet supported Hillary in the election."Clearly" You know who Trump selected for his cabinet. Actions speak much louder than words.