Right Wing nutjobs show their asses at another townhall (Again).
- Thread starter MexicanWarlord420
- Start date
what... huh?
Active Member
Why do we assume this was a poster of Rosa Parks? Not saying it isn't... just asking the question.
The police removed both people who were involved in the disturbance. It doesn't matter what the source of the disturbance was. She was obviously not being quiet about it, nor would I be, but then I would also be removed. The meeting cannot sit and wait while a debate over who was right happened.
She was obviously, and rightfully incensed.
The police removed both people who were involved in the disturbance. It doesn't matter what the source of the disturbance was. She was obviously not being quiet about it, nor would I be, but then I would also be removed. The meeting cannot sit and wait while a debate over who was right happened.
She was obviously, and rightfully incensed.
Personally I think she should have been allowed to stay, the white guy shoulda been thrown out.
hanimmal
Well-Known Member
But do we just have sex to procreate? Or is it a natural bi-product of our lifestyle of enjoying it.
Not necessarily, but if being able to reproduce is the main criteria then they should not be allowed to adopt. But if then it is just the need for a male and female to raise the child, then single parents would not be able to adopt, and what happens if one of the newly adopted parents die?
It is wrong to paint an entire group of people (that are established enough to have been around for all of human history) as not being able to be able to help out a child stuck in a horrible situation because we may not like their lifestyle or find it unnatural when it has nothing to do with us.
Pretty much although he worked all the time so he helped me with the work ethic that I have, But I mainly think that getting into wrestling at a young age kept me on track. Thank you, when I do see him next I will tell him that a dude on a pot website I frequent said he did a good job!
lol jk, thanks man, it is amazing the things we do to raise children.
For me I would argue about the income level of the people in prisons, then look at the type of home they came from. Not that if income is higher it will make the kid better, but it would allow (usually) for living in a better neighborhood, having better opportunities, ect. I think poverty is the biggest source of crime. But this is just a inference.
what... huh?
Active Member
I will presume you assume that homosexuality is a biological issue.
Do you think that all of ancient Greece was genetically predisposed to homosexuality? Or is it more logical to presume that the social environment which encouraged the behavior had a more recognizable effect?
I believe there are "true" gays out there, don't get me wrong, but the majority of what I see and interact with seems to be more socially influenced. Gays in other countries don't lisp typically. Hormonally imbalanced folks you can typically see in their bone structure... the morph towards androgyny. Look at the LPGA if you want a reference.
No I believe as a society embraces any segment of anti-social behavior it will breed it... no pun intended.
Some folks are tortured by their conflict until they figure out what their deal is... but I believe more are simply liberated by the free expression and drawn to the fetish as any fetish draws types.
You suppose the guys in prison are predisposed to the behavior?
What about guys who are just unable to make themselves appealing to the opposite sex, but find a lot of attention on the other side? Is it the draw to that attention, that desire to be wanted which allows this fetish to develop?
I am gonna throw out there that there is a lot of diddling that goes on which has odd effects on the psyche when growing up.
Explain the biology of Greece to me, and then you can address it as something other than, by in large, a deviant sexual fetish... which might also explain the promiscuity... don'cha think? And the flamboyance? Needy of attention so bad... to be identified as something to drain the pool of ambiguity around them?
Dunno... Just where I stand on it currently.
Do you think that all of ancient Greece was genetically predisposed to homosexuality? Or is it more logical to presume that the social environment which encouraged the behavior had a more recognizable effect?
I believe there are "true" gays out there, don't get me wrong, but the majority of what I see and interact with seems to be more socially influenced. Gays in other countries don't lisp typically. Hormonally imbalanced folks you can typically see in their bone structure... the morph towards androgyny. Look at the LPGA if you want a reference.
No I believe as a society embraces any segment of anti-social behavior it will breed it... no pun intended.
Some folks are tortured by their conflict until they figure out what their deal is... but I believe more are simply liberated by the free expression and drawn to the fetish as any fetish draws types.
You suppose the guys in prison are predisposed to the behavior?
What about guys who are just unable to make themselves appealing to the opposite sex, but find a lot of attention on the other side? Is it the draw to that attention, that desire to be wanted which allows this fetish to develop?
I am gonna throw out there that there is a lot of diddling that goes on which has odd effects on the psyche when growing up.
Explain the biology of Greece to me, and then you can address it as something other than, by in large, a deviant sexual fetish... which might also explain the promiscuity... don'cha think? And the flamboyance? Needy of attention so bad... to be identified as something to drain the pool of ambiguity around them?
Dunno... Just where I stand on it currently.