Robo-Socialist Republic

kelly4

Well-Known Member
The pyramids are carbon dated to be well beyond the date a human could possibly survive, in that you would be over 3000 years old. And currently that is not physically possible.

You are a liar.
My pinball buddies have a time machine.

I've also played poker with Jesus. He cheats.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
So what about the fact that Egypt is the Greek name for Egypt (actually in Greek: Aegyptos)... The "Egyptians" actually called themselves "Kemet" meanings "Land of the black". Eurocetric theorists say that they were referring to the color of the ground. But me (and the rest of the black people in Africa and America, or "Afrocentrists") are fairly certain that it meant "Land of the black... People" since the Nile river was an organization of "tribe" like structures that would have otherwise murdered each other, if it were not for the abundance around the nile and the need to support each other... Anyways, my point is that they were a people, not a type of dirt. And I am positive (though some people would disagree) that "Kemet" is referring to their tribes coming together in their past.

Then look up "The Grimaldi man"

Black people were not only in Europe 35,000-40,000 years ago... They were Cro-Magnon, while by all account white people were still Neanderthals... So, by conclusion, Neanderthals were white and Cro-Magnons were black.

Black people came from Africa (and were in Europe) mostly likely with fire and art (basically "the dragon" which we for some reason credit Asia with), sharing it with the Neanderthals and interbreeding with them over time.

(Stonehenge busted, compare it to the Stone Circle in the Sahara desert which was made in 7000 BC)


To answer the South American question, I can prove LINKS between the cultures. And there is archaeological evidence suggesting that West Africans were sailing oceans before anyone else was sailing seas. And that the South American pyramids MAY be a credit to ancient West Africans.

For one example, the Phoenican Semites (Carthage) had vessels that could navigate ALL over the Mediterranean, before Greek or Rome. Carthage was just "North Africa" and during this time South Africa was just considered "The Wilderness" or "The Slave Lands" or even considered to be non-existent (In Harold Lamb's book "Hannibal" it talks about how the word "Hispania" meant "Mythical Land" because the Greeks did not believe it existed when they first heard of it, but then someone went there and confirmed the "myth". But if you look online (at least when I searched) it says that the Etymology is not certain...

So there are things they are hiding from us. Egypt even stopped excavation in some places, and we all know about the main part of "Egypt" but if you go further south down the nile there are still tombs and stuff from the people that came before the Egyptians. There are tons of books and stuff about them.

Again, look up the stone circle in the Sahara that was made in like 7000 BC. It shows astrological knowledge that proves we were smarter than we thought, a lot sooner than we thought.


For example, compare an ancient Ghana statue to a Pre-Columbian one. Compare noses, lips, head shape etc. Then compare them to Mayans or Aztecs.

Also, compare ancient Africa's Dragon culture to Pre-Columbia's.


ok... umm, lemme just say, cool your jets bro, youre spinning out of control.

the greeks noted that the aegytians were NOT "nubians" or "ethiopians" or any other colour or creed of black african.
even i the earliest records available, the egytians were not described as BLACK AFRICANS (nor were the hittites, the akkadians, the punics, etc etc etc)
it is generally accepted that The Black Land referred to the fertile nile river valley's excellent RICH BLACK soil, not the egyptians themselves, who painted their own people on the walls of their temples and tombs as Mediterranean Looking, not negroids.
considering that this predates "euro-centrism" this would require a time machine, some really dedicated and quite racist master manipulators, and a lot of hard work to convince the black people of the most powerful empire on earth at the time to feel all Uncle Tomish, so they would paint themselves as honkies for the future historians to find.

or were they all just "High Yella", and "Able To Pass" it strains credulity

stonehenge is not "Busted' it is a complex work of engineering and is in fact a seasonal calendar for predicting the times of planting and harvest with great accuracy.
the stone circle you referenced was built ~5000 BC, not 7000BC. but yes, it serves the same purpose.

NO, black africans were NOT living in europe at any time in the past unless they came there via a trade route by their onesies and twosies well into the era of recorded history.
Black skin is a DOMINANT trait, not a recessive trait. if there were large populations of negroids living in europe, europeans would NOT look the way they do now.

Dragon legends exist in ALL CULTURES, and have since the dawn of time. smoke less weed, read more bro, your slippin into conjecture.

there is NO archaelogical evidence to suggest west africans crossed the atlantic to south america. ZERO. only mad tales told by revisionist afro-centric theorists who WISH africa were the fountainhead of all civilization, but this wellspring is found in Asia Minor, not africa.
The Olmec Basalt Heads, Pictured Below, range from the vaguely negroid...



to the distinctively Chinese.


yet the culture a society and genetics of south americans does not in any way resemble that of west africa.
Protip: the only domestic plant found in the New World and the Old World before the age of exploration was The Humble Peanut found in South America and... dun dun duuuuunnn!! China.

i dont know what "dragon" culture you are talking about. do you mean the Dogon Tribe?
if so, google Dogon Myth and discover, to your chagrin, that this was a case of Bad Science (poorly executed Anthropology and ideologically driven Sociology)
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
If you spent the money on learning how to make simple sensors instead of buying a rumba, you could probably think of an even better contraption based on their idea. And we are a Republic, so it would be like Rome or Greece. We would have more artists, poets, thinkers, etc.
Greece was enslaved by Rome. Rome was conquered by uneducated barbarians. They ate the artist, poets, and thinkers. Why would you say a republic requires slaves? Just trolling?
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
So what about the fact that Egypt is the Greek name for Egypt (actually in Greek: Aegyptos)... The "Egyptians" actually called themselves "Kemet" meanings "Land of the black". Eurocetric theorists say that they were referring to the color of the ground. But me (and the rest of the black people in Africa and America, or "Afrocentrists") are fairly certain that it meant "Land of the black... People" since the Nile river was an organization of "tribe" like structures that would have otherwise murdered each other, if it were not for the abundance around the nile and the need to support each other... Anyways, my point is that they were a people, not a type of dirt. And I am positive (though some people would disagree) that "Kemet" is referring to their tribes coming together in their past.
The Egyptians are still here. We don't have to guess.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
The Egyptians are still here. We don't have to guess.
That's a joke. The influence in Egypt became ever more Asian. The Old Kindom, Middle Kingdom and New Kingdom were all different. And that was ALL considered "ancient egypt" so it is stupid to say they are "still here", they were hardly the same by the end of the Old Kingdom, let alone NOW.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
the greeks noted that the aegytians were NOT "nubians" or "ethiopians" or any other colour or creed of black african. ca.
The Olmec Basalt Heads, Pictured Below, range from the vaguely negroid...



to the distinctively Chinese.
LOL

1st. The Greeks didn't get to Egypt until LONG after the time of Imhotep. And Egypt had become increasingly Asian during that time in the middle.

2nd. That second statue is not "distinctively" asian, that is a black person. Compare that statue to Notorious B.I.G.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Also, to discriminate between "black" and "middle eastern" or "asian" is stupid. They all have "Semitic" heritage...
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member


ok... umm, lemme just say, cool your jets bro, youre spinning out of control.
Wait wait wait.... I just remembered. You realize you came in here saying that aliens were involved in all of these things, right? But then tell me I am spinning out of control when I suggest intelligent black people. Is that not a bit... racist?

Or if not racist, it is at least crazier than the idea of intelligent ancient black people.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
I also want to point out in opposition to the "they are still there" argument. Hardly anyone still lives ON the Nile farming, and the people that do are mostly of DARK complexion, which we would consider "black".
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
LOL

1st. The Greeks didn't get to Egypt until LONG after the time of Imhotep. And Egypt had become increasingly Asian during that time in the middle.

2nd. That second statue is not "distinctively" asian, that is a black person. Compare that statue to Notorious B.I.G.
1. greek travellers have been going to egypt for a VERY long time.

2. biggie smalls doesnt have epicanthic folds. you are just WRONG.
 

Dr Kynes

Well-Known Member
And check out the Zimbabwe ark. Evidence of Jews (Moses' descendants) in deep Africa.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

you are a crackpot.

the nazis claimed that the "Real Germans" were "aryans" from... seriously, im not kidding, ATLANTIS despite actual aryans being INDO-PERSIANS, specifically a group of indians who migrated to asia minor from asia major in distant history, displacing the nomadic tribes who lived there first (and niether group was negroid)

crackpots can claim anything they like, that doesnt make it factual, and the "Ark of the Covenant" you have so carelessly referenced is an ARTISTS RENDITION, of what they CLAIM the "real ark" looked like. it's not even a fraud, they dont pretend it is the "real" fictional box full of rocks claimed in the torah.

ohh shit i just realized who i am talking to.

yeah, everybody who ever did anything notable was black, and honkies just took credit for it, with their time machines and mind control powers.

enjoy your crazy.
 

see4

Well-Known Member
Wait wait wait.... I just remembered. You realize you came in here saying that aliens were involved in all of these things, right? But then tell me I am spinning out of control when I suggest intelligent black people. Is that not a bit... racist?

Or if not racist, it is at least crazier than the idea of intelligent ancient black people.
Fin. I never knew you had this in you. It's giving me great erection.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
That's a joke. The influence in Egypt became ever more Asian. The Old Kindom, Middle Kingdom and New Kingdom were all different. And that was ALL considered "ancient egypt" so it is stupid to say they are "still here", they were hardly the same by the end of the Old Kingdom, let alone NOW.
The genetics are the same.
 

Red1966

Well-Known Member
I also want to point out in opposition to the "they are still there" argument. Hardly anyone still lives ON the Nile farming, and the people that do are mostly of DARK complexion, which we would consider "black".
I know a few Egyptians. While darker than Caucasians, they could hardly be considered black. And they will punch you out if you say they are.
 
Top