Romney promised to bring unemployment down to 6% after four years with his economic plan...

Skylor

Well-Known Member
Obama was the lesser of the two evils. If I had to trust my life with Obama or Romney, who do U think I pick ? Romeny even said he doesn't care about the 46% of those who will not vote for him, believe it or not, Obama cares about all of us. Of course I don't agree with all that Oabam does, heck I believe i would be happier living in Jamaica, ha ha but if I could, I would vote for Obama again
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Obama was the lesser of the two evils. If I had to trust my life with Obama or Romney, who do U think I pick ? Romeny even said he doesn't care about the 46% of those who will not vote for him, believe it or not, Obama cares about all of us. Of course I don't agree with all that Oabam does, heck I believe i would be happier living in Jamaica, ha ha but if I could, I would vote for Obama again
The lesser of two evils is still evil. Voting for evil will get you what you voted for.
 

reasonevangelist

Well-Known Member
The lesser of two evils is still evil. Voting for evil will get you what you voted for.
This is exactly the same thought that crossed my mind, but i didn't post it.

"The lesser of two evils is still evil" is part of how and why "problem > reaction > solution" works. It's also how herding cattle works. The cattle may not want to go where you want them to go, but if you block the sides and place a threat opposite your intended gate, that's exactly where they'll go. They don't want to go there, they're just running away from something worse. The only alternative is to attack the threat, instead of fleeing from it... but a docile herd of domesticated cattle, isn't really up for a real fight, because they're deliberately not developed for combat, but for consumption by the shepherds and those who purchase from them.

Edit:

Also: ever wonder why there are only "two" evils, from which to choose? Binary is much easier to manipulate. Adding 3rd and 4th choices, allows too many possibly undesirable outcomes. Yes/No, One/Zero, On/Off, is much better for the shepherds... much worse for the sheep.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
the asshurt racist righties already declared those numbers to be "pure fiction" as if on cue, and verbatim, so there is no point to bring them up.

or, should i say in your case, bring them down, since you are a laughable 4'10'' on a good day.
I love how you've no point so you just shit yourself and try smear it on everyone.

Racist! White nationalist!

Stormfront?"!

I'm a better Buck that you, lol.
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
This is exactly the same thought that crossed my mind, but i didn't post it.

"The lesser of two evils is still evil" is part of how and why "problem > reaction > solution" works. It's also how herding cattle works. The cattle may not want to go where you want them to go, but if you block the sides and place a threat opposite your intended gate, that's exactly where they'll go. They don't want to go there, they're just running away from something worse. The only alternative is to attack the threat, instead of fleeing from it... but a docile herd of domesticated cattle, isn't really up for a real fight, because they're deliberately not developed for combat, but for consumption by the shepherds and those who purchase from them.

Edit:

Also: ever wonder why there are only "two" evils, from which to choose? Binary is much easier to manipulate. Adding 3rd and 4th choices, allows too many possibly undesirable outcomes. Yes/No, One/Zero, On/Off, is much better for the shepherds... much worse for the sheep.
I agree with you that people are duped.

Yet, even if the "choices" of candidates were expanded to a large number it is still a shell game.

UNTIL, the choices for people include a, no thank you, I am peaceful and have opted out of your state/nation/empire etc. the illusion of choice will persist and most will not see the illusion. They get caught up in the puppet show.
 

MuyLocoNC

Well-Known Member
Which is something Rick Perry Seems to celebrate and brag about
Guess Perry isnt a conservative
I have no idea what Perry is these days. By MY opinion he may be miles away from being Conservative. WTF DOES perry have to do with anything? Should I start pulling random Democrat governors and listing their idiocy?
 

jahbrudda

Well-Known Member
This thread is nothing but an excuse for the obviuos Obama failure.
At least the blaming Bush days are about over.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
This thread is nothing but an excuse for the obviuos Obama failure.
aspects of the "obvious obama failure":

*STOCK MARKET AT RECORD HIGH

*HOME VALUES CONTINUING TO CLIMB

*53 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF JOB CREATION (ALL TIME RECORD)

*DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCTION HIGHEST IN DECADES

*MARRIAGE EQUALITY SPREADING RAPIDLY

*LEGAL RECREATIONAL CANNABIS

*BEENTHERE'S PENIS SMALLER, MORE FLACCID THAN EVER
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
aspects of the "obvious obama failure":

*STOCK MARKET AT RECORD HIGH

*HOME VALUES CONTINUING TO CLIMB

*53 CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF JOB CREATION (ALL TIME RECORD)

*DOMESTIC ENERGY PRODUCTION HIGHEST IN DECADES

*MARRIAGE EQUALITY SPREADING RAPIDLY

*LEGAL RECREATIONAL CANNABIS

*BEENTHERE'S PENIS SMALLER, MORE FLACCID THAN EVER
Obama:
"No I do not support the legalisation of cannabis"

Moar dispensary raids than Bush.

Yet somehow the retarded left thinks he's a champion of cannabis...

What's to be expected from walrus marrying alcoholics?
 

sheskunk

Well-Known Member
If all the numbers add up to success why is everything still in the shitter? You can tell me things are better, but when I step out into the real world I certainly don't see it.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
If all the numbers add up to success why is everything still in the shitter? You can tell me things are better, but when I step out into the real world I certainly don't see it.
"facts and evidence will not convince me!" - sheskunk
 
Top