... and a vote for anybody other than Dr Paul is a vote against America, truth, justice, your mother, freedom, reason, honesty, love, puppies, children, ice cream, veterans, sunshine, laughing and orgasmic sex. 2 periods..A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama..........Period.
Did you watch the same debate i watched? Paul directly answers questions... I can't say the same for any of the other candidates - they go for easy applause. This kind of defeatist attitude towards Ron Paul is what will put Obama right back into office. If we vote for him we will win, it's that simple. There is a reason the media is blacking him out. There is a reason why pundits use talking points like "he's unelectable", or "a vote for RP is a vote for Obama". These kind of ideas spread (just like they're designed to do) not because they're factual, rather because they don't require any additional investigation. This is what propaganda looks like.Ron Paul didn't win the debate. He won the measured results on Twitter but that's meaningless since his people over-whelmed the voting. He stumbled a few times and did only ok. There is no disagreeing with what you say but the fact remains: A vote for Paul (if he runs as a independant), it only takes votes from the Republicans which in turn helps the Dems. The real question should be do you want Obama again for another 4 years or a Republican- ANY REPUBLICAN? A vote for Paul is a wasted vote, like Ralph Nadar and many others before him.
no, he won't. ronald the millionaire will NEVER carry florida in a general.If we vote for him we will win, it's that simple.
If you like Obama, then vote for Obama. If you like Romney, then vote for Romney. Why would anybody wring their hands thinking, "oh my God, I must vote for the winner". Vote your fucking conscience, let the chips fall where they may.no, he won't. ronald the millionaire will NEVER carry florida in a general.
kerry's states + florida = 271. game over.
i don't ever recall saying anything of the sort.If you like Obama, then vote for Obama. If you like Romney, then vote for Romney. Why would anybody wring their hands thinking, "oh my God, I must vote for the winner". Vote your fucking conscience, let the chips fall where they may.
If he doesn't win the majority of people- the 99%, will lose and you and people like you will be to blamei don't ever recall saying anything of the sort.
all i was pointing out is the impossibility of a paul presidency.
i can live with that.If he doesn't win the majority of people- the 99%, will lose and you and people like you will be to blame
Plan on working in one of the camps?i can live with that.
irrational paranoiders gonna irrationally paranoid.Plan on working in one of the camps?
It's going to take a lot of work to get the population down to 500,000,000 but hey I guess that means job security for you.
Which is why I LOL at either sides presidential candidates talking about tax reform. You have to get congress to agree, it is the purse strings that they control that give them the power.I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
Well he will do a lot, bring the troops home, end the drug war, etc...all possible without congress...Republican's will definitely go with him on stuff if it makes them win votes...Democrats agree with him on social liberties.. It is more likely he would get the most done..There is a lot he wants to do that both parties agree on especially if he was president and not a congressman.I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
I don't think "impossible" means what you think it means. If the majority of people vote for Ron Paul then he will be the next president.i don't ever recall saying anything of the sort.
all i was pointing out is the impossibility of a paul presidency.
The REAL question is: "Why do you think there is ANY difference between ANY Republican, other than Dr Paul and Obama?"The real question should be do you want Obama again for another 4 years or a Republican- ANY REPUBLICAN? A vote for Paul is a wasted vote, like Ralph Nadar and many others before him.
He'll reverse others executive orders. The president controls the troop movement so he can bring them home.I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
You think he will? Not just campaign slogans, do you honestly think he is going to shut down the military industrial complex. I like some of the stuff he talks about, but my gut tells me were he to get in a few things would change but nothing "important". You know what I mean?He'll reverse others executive orders. The president controls the troop movement so he can bring them home.