Sacramento police enforce pot greenhouse laws

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
silasraven said:
wow concrete floor? now your forced to buy soil, and pay even more taxes on already taxed everything. greenhouse "kool?" dude its 5 grand for a decent one with vents and all. its a fucking plant its meant to go into the ground. no plant shop anywhere , that grows plants, uses a concrete floor not even the college. but give credit where credit is due, thanks allot guys and gals who voted for weed. you did this too us. before we were just gardeners laying low and enjoying life. thanks for the rules folks,\.
Click to expand...
you tell those darn cannabis growers!

how dare they push for re-legalization at the expense of the greenhouse that you're not physically able nor financially positioned to build!

those mean ol' cali growers, fucking it up for you up in washington.

:cuss:
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
Because anybody can throw up a shanty and call it a green house. And a fixed perma structure means a sill plate fastened to concrete with anchors. I don't think it still doesn't mean you can't have 3 X 3 holes in your slab though. lol Like the other guys said though they might try to hang you up getting a permit when you tell them what it's for.
 
ZAQ

ZAQ

Member
the X pig kids a concrete contractor the one that built the speck house that can flood 22 feet in less than 5 mi
 
LocknessMD

LocknessMD

Active Member
TWS said:
Because anybody can throw up a shanty and call it a green house. And a fixed perma structure means a sill plate fastened to concrete with anchors. I don't think it still doesn't mean you can't have 3 X 3 holes in your slab though. lol Like the other guys said though they might try to hang you up getting a permit when you tell them what it's for.
Click to expand...
That would be pretty cool to throw some sonotube in the pour just we do at work from time to time :p. But yeah, a few of those on a small 10x10 slab would not pass any sort of inspection haha.
 
ZAQ

ZAQ

Member
The X sherf Rob watters is on Sacramento City Council his kid built all the homes in the U>S deep flood plan .he a concrete contractor and look at the cash tigger gave to Watters
In Sac there no rock in less it comes from tiggers gravel pits the best of it is Officers assigned to the Sacramento Police Department's SWAT team is doing the calls

 
P

PurpleBuz

Well-Known Member
TWS said:
Because anybody can throw up a shanty and call it a green house. And a fixed perma structure means a sill plate fastened to concrete with anchors. I don't think it still doesn't mean you can't have 3 X 3 holes in your slab though. lol Like the other guys said though they might try to hang you up getting a permit when you tell them what it's for.
Click to expand...
Except that a very substantial greenhouse with foundations are often built without a concrete floor and in many cases is preferred and would not be considered a cheap shanty. I go with the concrete supplier theorey
 
ZAQ

ZAQ

Member
FEMA, meet Permit-gate
was just two years ago when the Federal Emergency Management Agencyannounced the results of its post-Hurricane Katrina assessment of our city’s levee system. The take-home message was shocking. The report stated: “Sacramento is considered the urban area most vulnerable to catastrophic flooding in the nation.”But it seems we still don’t really get the point.
FEMA spoke to Sacramento again about two weeks ago—this time in a scolding response to a scandal that’s become known as “Permit-gate”—wherein the son of City Councilman Robbie Waters, acting as a customer-service supervisor for the city’s Community Development Department last fall, signed off on a request to build 35 homes in the flood zone that is North Natomas. Basically, Dan Waters played a trick with the computer so as to give K. Hovnanian Homes “overrides” on needed permits to proceed with construction despite a moratorium.
In its letter to Mayor Kevin Johnson, FEMA gave the city two options for responding to the scandal. Either demand the structures in question to be elevated to flood-plain level (that means building would have to be raised as much as 20 feet—a request so expensive as to be prohibitive) or stop work altogether and leave the structures unoccupied. The city has 60 days to respond.
The city should comply with the request, confirm that the permit scandal was an isolated incident, then get together what Rep. Doris Matsui calls a “robust remediation plan” for FEMA—and fast.
Otherwise, Permit-gate could result in a tragic crash and fail of the city’s longstanding efforts to reduce flood risk and lower flood-insurance rates for those who live in our area’s many flood zones.

http://www.newsreview.com/sacramento/fema-meet-permit-gate/content?oid=1376592
I am looking for the money it was over $750,000
 
ReefBongwell

ReefBongwell

Well-Known Member
You should tie a couple of these articles together with legal documentation linking him to those companies and pass it on to some journalists... could be they'll all be paid for/dumbasses who won't do anything with it but at least you'll have tried... go to the tv news even they love a good scandal
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
PurpleBuz said:
Except that a very substantial greenhouse with foundations are often built without a concrete floor and in many cases is preferred and would not be considered a cheap shanty. I go with the concrete supplier theorey
Click to expand...
True but you know most of them wouldn't be like that. Be looking like the slums of Tijuana.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top