scroglodyte
Well-Known Member
popcorn must cause large breasts
so if someone self identifies as the opposite gender, takes hormones, goes through the whole operation and everything, you still feel it's your right to tell them that they are no what they live as day to day?One person's big deal is another person's small deal. Sure, just let marriage be redefined. Why not make it legal for anyone to just call themselves male or female regardless of biology while we're at it?
so equal rights are not important to you, but partisan hackery is?I hear them now:
"We are queer, we are gay
we're costing Obama more votes to-day!"
Why are you being so defensive? You can admit it here.i guess i'd have to be gay to support equal rights for gays, eh?
i couldn't be simply not a republican. or a douche. or a bigot. i'd have to be gay to support gay marriage.
fucking numbskull.
Marriage has a legal definition. It doesn't need to be changed to give gay couples 100% legal rights. Why should that not be acceptable? The answer is because they don't just want "their" rights, they want to hurt others along the way.How about this.....since marriage has "religious sanctity", to so many religions, then why is our government even meddling in the "business of marriage". If a recognized religious denomination or movement feels it is necessary to allow same sex marriage, then the US Government and States, have no right to say that this can or can not happen....and visa-versa for religious organizations that do not wish to allow same sex marriages. Keep in mind that there is a "separation of church and state". With that being said the government should only be dealing in the business of "civil unions" and the definitions of what that should be.....just my 2 cents.
so if the term marriage should be so unimportant, it will be no big deal that gays get it and straight people like us take the term civil union, right?Marriage has a legal definition. It doesn't need to be changed to give gay couples 100% legal rights. Why should that not be acceptable? The answer is because they don't just want "their" rights, they want to hurt others along the way.
Interesting that you can't just say yes or no.will you let me fuck you in the ass if i say i'm gay?
the better question is, why the fuck are you so concerned with other people's sexuality?
dickface.
You have never been right and surely never will be.so if the term marriage should be so unimportant, it will be no big deal that gays get it and straight people like us take the term civil union, right?
am i right?
so tell me, how will you personally be "hurt" if gays can get marriage too?You have never been right and surely never will be.
What politician wouldn't?Santorum would jump on the pro-Satan bandwagon if it suited his political career.
poly......Greek prefix for "many"
ticks.....blood-sucking parasites
If you did your homework, you'd know that civil unions, in most if not all states, DO NOT grant equal rights. Rather, they actually limit certain rights that marriages are granted without question. For example: marriage automatically makes you the decider of your partner's fate should s/he take ill and not be able to make decisions. Civil unions ONLY grant that right IF the next of blood kin says it's okay. Also, civil unions don't permit insurance coverage, nor do they permit the ability to file joint tax returns.Civil union with exactly equal rights isn't good enough for them.
Just cause someone takes hormones, goes thru ops doesnt change the fact of the gender they were born as. Male is male and female is femaleso if someone self identifies as the opposite gender, takes hormones, goes through the whole operation and everything, you still feel it's your right to tell them that they are no what they live as day to day?
by that logic, we can stop calling idiots like you republicans, and start calling them bigots.
That's why I quit believing in the fantasy of a sado-masochist in the sky who was supposed to return and 'save' me one day. Guess what? He's been coming back for over 2,000 years! How long IS that fuckin trip?^^^The Bible and Christianity have clearly defined marriage as being between a man and a woman for the last 2,000 yrs AND the Bible and Christianity are very anti-gay. Just that one sentence that says 'homosexuality is an abomination' and BOOM! 2,000 yrs of injustice! What if Jesus was also gay? I'm sure fags were Crucified on a regular basis! In fact, I bet when a fag was gonna hit the crucifix, people drank and partied more
They already do. Don't you know what a Transgendered man/woman is? Oh, and by the way - it's LEGAL.One person's big deal is another person's small deal. Sure, just let marriage be redefined. Why not make it legal for anyone to just call themselves male or female regardless of biology while we're at it?
Obviously I'm not talking about gender change. That is a way of physically changing to conform to the definition of male and female. I mean, why can't I just fill out a legal form one day and say I'm male, and again the next day and say I'm female? Or black and white? Or age?They already do. Don't you know what a Transgendered man/woman is? Oh, and by the way - it's LEGAL.