but i'm certain that red does.
good job on a sciency "guesstimation".
why would i? you said you couldn't find anything to back red's claim.
nope.
burden of proof is on the person making the claim. that would be red, or you, since you decided to carry that idiot's water.
you're the one who made that claim, then you argued against that claim when you could find nothing to back up red's assertion about water vapor having a "hundredfold effect" over CO2.
seems to me if AGW draws grant money so easily, such a powerful force would get tons of funding and you'd have no problem finding something to back you up.
idiot.
still waiting for citation of the claim, not just back of the eggo box math by you.